I just want to win. I don't see how having an awareness of critical flaws in a player's game that have existed his entire career is "biased & jaded" information. Enos is giving Perry a clean slate and a fair shot at winning the job which any coach would. That doesn't mean Perry's flaws have been solved. Every indication is that he's still highly erratic under duress and isn't secure with the ball.
I've evaluated all 3 QBs extensively dating back to high school. I know what they bring to the table and I'll take my chances with the guys who manage the pocket more effectively and value the football, until proven otherwise. Our offensive line isn't good enough to start a guy who has bad habits like drifting in the pocket, dropping his eyes against the rush, being loose with the ball in the pocket, and forcing throws downfield or scrambling recklessly when there are reads available.
Feel free to disagree with my evaluations but I've heard enough of these theorycrafting hypothetical arguments about the QB battle that completely disregard the traits and resumes of these candidates. We're fans and we're allowed to form opinions about players and prefer one option over the other. Coaches are not infallible when it comes to personnel management. Far from it actually.
I don't think you guys realize I'm primarily talking about Perry's on-field flaws, although his personality contributes to them - as with anyone - so it all kinda goes hand in hand.