forums

Possible rules changes...

Advertisement
Palm Harbor Cane said:
Exactly I don’t think Alabama has ever has a player kicked out of a game for targeting!
Click to expand...
Agree with you.
I was actually talking about calling offensive players as well as defensive. Running Back lowers head for extra yardage. Defensive player now inadvertently hits his head. To me, this should not be a call. Game happens too fast. But. . . . In reality, if this has to be a flag, it should go against the offensive player. Almost never does.
 
Last edited:
Heart of The Playmaker said:
Pretty soon the last few team sports with any testosterone will be Hockey, lacrosse, and rugby.
Click to expand...
Yep, and for our badazz punter's sake, let's not forget Aussie Rules Football


81562
 
QuatroCane said:
  • Suspend a player for the entire next game for a second targeting call in the same season
  • no more two man wedge on KO's
  • after 5th OT go to 2pt conversion attempts
  • no more blindside blocks, now a 15yrd PF
www.ncaa.com

Football Rules Committee proposes modifying targeting protocols

The NCAA Football Rules Committee met this week in Indianapolis and recommended two adjustments to its targeting rules to strengthen one of the most important calls of the game.
www.ncaa.com www.ncaa.com
Click to expand...

Tough to call blindside blocks. Every pileup scrums, by definition, have "blind side blocks" and contact.

Tackling a player from behind is another form of "blind side" contact.

Where does this end up?
 
Back
Top