Pitt the third

[Jaromir Jagr]

One year sample size.

Amazing.

The lengths someone will go to in order to protect a hero.

One year = no validity

One weekend = Tim Corbin is a failure

Jagr is treating Piccolo like Missouri State against Miami.

 

[Peter Gibbons]

Vandy, 2007 = HAHAHAHA WHAT A CHOKE JOB

Yep

I'm loving your manic state right now. Desperately trying to rewrite history in order to protect your hero.

 

[Peter Gibbons]

One year = no validity

One year used to state a conclusion about home field and seeding writ large = yes, no validity

 

[Peter Gibbons]

One weekend = Tim Corbin is a failure

One weekend at home in a seeded tournament to conclude that 2007 was a failure = totally valid

 

[Jaromir Jagr]

One year used to state a conclusion about home field and seeding writ large = yes, no validity

One weekend to make a judgement about Tim Corbin = no validity

 

[Peter Gibbons]

Jagr is treating Piccolo like Missouri State against Miami.

I'm serious.

I don't think I've ever seen someone claim to be so smart and informed and yet employ so much stupidity and so many logical fallacies.

It's breathtaking.

 

[Jaromir Jagr]

One weekend at home in a seeded tournament to conclude that 2007 was a failure = totally valid

One weekend at home (twice) to conclude that 2012 and 2014 were failures = totally valid

Two full seasons of not making the tournament at a blue blood program = totally valid

 

[Peter Gibbons]

One weekend to make a judgement about Tim Corbin = no validity

That's not what I did.

But keep lying to protect your hero.

 

[Jaromir Jagr]

I'm serious.

I don't think I've ever seen someone claim to be so smart and informed and yet employ so much stupidity and so many logical fallacies.

It's breathtaking.

Which is why you make posts like that instead of actually proving the points wrong.

 

[Peter Gibbons]

One weekend at home (twice) to conclude that 2012 and 2014 were failures = totally valid

Nobody disputed that.

"But 2012!"

Funny.

 

[Jaromir Jagr]

Nobody disputed that.

"But 2012!"

Funny.

While you have talked for two days about 2007.

 

[Peter Gibbons]

Which is why you make posts like that instead of actually proving the points wrong.

I've spent years proving you wrong.

All of this work had already been done.

You're clearly too stupid to understand randomness, sample sizes, etc.

 

[Peter Gibbons]

While you have talked for two days about 2007.

Because what I'm saying is a fact and I enjoy making you dance to defend your idol.

 

[Jaromir Jagr]

Because what I'm saying is a fact and I enjoy making you dance to defend your idol.

While 2012, 2014, 2017, and 2018 are also facts.

 

[Jaromir Jagr]

Quick side question....why did you only reappear after we finally won a series?

 

[Jaromir Jagr]

And why has the 1993 failure not been addressed?

 

[Jaromir Jagr]

"But 2012!"

Funny.

I'll talk about 2018 all day if you want to.

 

[Jaromir Jagr]

"Jim Morris has never failed like Tim Corbin in 2007".

What about 2012?

"HAHAHA all he can talk about is 2012"

I win.

 

[Peter Gibbons]

Quick side question....why did you only reappear after we finally won a series?

This, again.

Please.

I'll slap you around whenever I feel like it.

 

[Peter Gibbons]

"Jim Morris has never failed like Tim Corbin in 2007".

What about 2012?

"HAHAHA all he can talk about is 2012"

I win.

As I've already said, many times, you're a liar.

2007 is not equivalent to 2012.

And I've never defended the latter while you desperately try to defend the former.