- Joined
- Aug 15, 2014
- Messages
- 15,373
Don't ask Brock for help in that dilemma fyiBingo. It's like me saying, "This steak tastes weird", while eating a pizza. You have to know what you're judging.
Don't ask Brock for help in that dilemma fyiBingo. It's like me saying, "This steak tastes weird", while eating a pizza. You have to know what you're judging.
The NFL pays for their information about snap counts etc... can you show any team that paid for their ratings?
I’m genuinely unaware of any professional team paying for their ratings.
I can ask him what kind of ketchup to put on my pizza.Don't ask Brock for help in that dilemma fyi
That’s coming from NFL scouts that I talk to, as mentioned above teams will subscribe for some of their raw data but don’t use their ratings, they all have their own analytics departments. They’re generally in the right ballpark but if you’re not on the team or staff then you can’t possibly know exactly what each guy is supposed to do and this “grade” with complete accuracyThis isnt true at all. They don’t have the call sheet but an outside zone is an outside zone, a ZR, RPO, smash concepts are all the same packaged differently. Do you think they grade in a vacuum? Jesus people are really talking out of their a$$holes more than usual today
Most teams have their own analytic departments at this point. My best friend is the HC at one of the top D3 schools in the country and they have an “analytics staff”That’s coming from NFL scouts that I talk to, as mentioned above teams will subscribe for some of their raw data but don’t use their ratings, they all have their own analytics departments. They’re generally in the right ballpark but if you’re not on the team or staff then you can’t possibly know exactly what each guy is supposed to do and this “grade” with complete accuracy
![]()
The NFL is starting to use AI to figure out how much it should actually pay players, and early data shows one position is more at risk for a pay cut than others
Pro Football Focus, a football analytics company, is using algorithms to project what an NFL player's value is.www.businessinsider.com
You could dig deeper if you like...before Collinsworth invested, teams were already paying for PFF.
Whatever algorithm they use is some sort of collection of their data. NFL and college teams use a lot of their data to begin with...what they do with certain numbers is kind of irrelevant. Maybe those numbers curated by the algorithm are nonsense and no one uses them...but they are there, and teams use a ton of other numbers.
If they were just using snapcount numbers, I don't think they'd work with or care about PFF specifically. You could have gotten those from stats, inc or whatever other source they were using before PFF existed.
For those saying Patchan didn't play well watch the game again. He was all over the place. I was pleasantly surprised and I don't know anything about PFF but seems they back up his play.Patchan was solid all game
The article does not appear to claim any team pays for their player ratings.
I’m not arguing this further than this post as I’ve seen it countless times. Nothing personal.
The assumption countless people make that because some (maybe all) teams use some PFF services doesn’t mean all teams believe having an outside “analyst” in Bangladesh (true story) grading players without knowing the play call is useful. Chip Kelly for example thinks it’s a laughingstock. The analysis side is far from perfect because it lacks a very very important part of the equation - the play call and assignments for all players involved.
Is it better than my analysis?
Absolutely.
Is it better than the coaching staff of a college team or professional team going over film?
Highly unlikely in my opinion.