pat narduzzi film session..

Advertisement
It depends on their routes.The corners jam and safeties read inside recievers.

The Corner jams and and if his man goes deep hes manned up, if he stops short there is underneath help. Safety reads inside receiver if he goes deep hes manned up if he cuts in the is underneath help and the safety plays center field.

They split the field in "halves" that is their "base". The blitzing is a little different but same principle. 4 down lineman with double a gap pressure. The Corners play the man/zone combo, one safety plays Robber (center field)and the remaining LB and safety play underneath in halves. Just one type of blitz

I'd like to hear if you play a 4-3 defense and you opponent has a 4 wr set formation how would you guys cover it? I'd like to hear this one. As far as I know the Strong or Weak linebacker always covers the the slot receiver.
 
guy makes close to a million as a defensive coordinator he might be holding out for a huge pay day . i doubt we are gonna offer too much , can we afford 6 years 15 million . 2.5 per ?
 
Advertisement
I'd like to hear if you play a 4-3 defense and you opponent has a 4 wr set formation how would you guys cover it? I'd like to hear this one. As far as I know the Strong or Weak linebacker always covers the the slot receiver.

Have you heard of a Nickel package?

Don't let Narduzzi fool you: his defense is extremely simple, but he's also a master of 3rd down blitzes out of his nickel package. Creative as **** and aggressive. Dude basically took what Tommy Tubbs taught him at a clinic in Miami and then added a few twists and a sick 3rd down blitz package.

This is spot on. I sat in some defensive meetings recently with tubs staff and they run quarters about 80% of the time. Narduzzi presses all the time because he wants to invite the offense to throw the least completed route by the outside receivers, the fade. He's calculated the percentage of times teams completed the fade against him and it's in the low teen's. The quarters gets nine men in the box to stop the run and if you watch the game Saturday, MSU versus Oregon, key in on Mich St.'s safeties they are 9 yards of the ball and the first sight of outside run they are screaming to force the ball to the linebackers. Aggressive!
 
It depends on their routes.The corners jam and safeties read inside recievers.

The Corner jams and and if his man goes deep hes manned up, if he stops short there is underneath help. Safety reads inside receiver if he goes deep hes manned up if he cuts in the is underneath help and the safety plays center field.

They split the field in "halves" that is their "base". The blitzing is a little different but same principle. 4 down lineman with double a gap pressure. The Corners play the man/zone combo, one safety plays Robber (center field)and the remaining LB and safety play underneath in halves. Just one type of blitz

I'd like to hear if you play a 4-3 defense and you opponent has a 4 wr set formation how would you guys cover it? I'd like to hear this one. As far as I know the Strong or Weak linebacker always covers the the slot receiver.

Good post. It's still buzz-4, though, with hard inside technique from CBs. This coverage as base is designed to force balls into the flats and stop the ground game. The upfront play is pure Miami defense...40 slide.
 
All I had to hear was his comment talking about Oregon. He said basically "my defense is versatile, but simple. I spend one half teaching them and the other half adapting to their opponents. I make it simple and give them the ability to adjust quicker"

Like I don't know, when you have 6 guys covering 4 and 3 guys covering 6? Like having ten men on the field, one CB covering no one and 1 CB and 1 S covering 3 WRs? Maybe spots like that where your players could adjust?

The next time I see a LB cover a slot receiver I'm going to flip.

What about the next time you see a DE cover a slot receiver?

Well ****, you had to bring that up didn't you? I want to forget that ever happened.

It happens every week, impossible to forget.
 
After reading some of the comments by our more knowledgeable X and O's guys and that article posted above...

Good lord we'd WRECK on defense with Narduzzi. Why has he not taken a HC job somewhere though? I think it would be pretty **** difficult and unlikely for us to get him.
 
Simplicity on D tends to lend itself to success. I also like the idea of having a coach who modeled his dynamic defense after the past great canes. All around I'm on board with Narduzzi. I really hope this is the next head coach of the canes whenever that may be.
 
Advertisement
Bang-up job by Narduzzi's defense yesterday. Funny how that defense loks when they're not playing against garbage Big 10 teams and slow *** Stanford.
 
Bang-up job by Narduzzi's defense yesterday. Funny how that defense loks when they're not playing against garbage Big 10 teams and slow *** Stanford.

Clueless is as clueless does... you may want to read up on the Stanford/Oregon rivalry from last year. Slow, you guys try way to hard to disprove a known good DC for the sake of building up the worst DC the canes have ever seen.
 
Bang-up job by Narduzzi's defense yesterday. Funny how that defense loks when they're not playing against garbage Big 10 teams and slow *** Stanford.

Clueless is as clueless does... you may want to read up on the Stanford/Oregon rivalry from last year. Slow, you guys try way to hard to disprove a known good DC for the sake of building up the worst DC the canes have ever seen.

I'm confident that Narduzzi is better than D'Onofrio, but it does concern me that he does his work against the Big Ten when we are looking for him to be the answer to our problem.
 
Back
Top