I keep hearing boneheads telling me Folden develops players just because some guys who were on his team got drafted. They neglect the fact that most of those guys were drafted lower than they should have been if they were properly used/developed.
And then there are guys like Gunter, who were so misused, that they didn't get to showcase their talent at all here and went undrafted.
He ran the 3rd slowest cb time this year in the 40. That's why he didn't get drafted. Before that he was considered a top 100 player and he did fine at Miami
He was misused here, broke. I know you don't get it, but he was badly misused. Had he been used right and been able to show the skills he's showing in Green Bay he would have been drafted regardless of his 40.
The same guy who ran that slow 40 is the same guy playing better than any of Green Bay's CBs. If the NFL had another draft tomorrow and he ran the same 40 he'd get drafted because the Packers have shown the league how good of a PLAYER he is if used properly.
The reason he went undrafted is because he ran a slow AND he never got to showcase what he was good at here. There was nothing to justify drafting him after that 40 because there was no film to justify using the pick.
Can you comprehend that sort of complex thinking, or will you insist on the "he ran a slow 40 so he didn't get drafted" infantile thought process? You'll never advance beyond "broke, where did you put the gauze pads?" as a pa if you can't improve your cognitive process.