OT: Joe Mixon Punch Video Released

[rt cane]

Nobody's saying she's right. She's clearly wrong. Her own actions are criminal in themselves. That's not the point. The point is she was not a physical threat to him in the slightest. His reaction was totally disproportionate to a non-threatening situation.

Just because she's a dumb drunk biītch that slapped him, doesn't warrant the type of response he gave. He literally could have killed her, as three facial fractures would attest.

Like I said before, how people react to this a litmus test for your functioning status in a civilized society. In general, low-impulse control, less successful, less adaptable, and generally lower socioeconomic, lower intelligence, and low social-IQ people find justification in his disproportionate response, and some even state they would have done the same.

The more successful, more intelligent, higher status individuals will understand the criminal nature of his response.

And how many of these more intelligent, higher status individuals condemn cops when they shoot unarmed black men, sometimes as they are literally running away ?

Pants up don't loot.

 

[The Franchise]

How many of the people in this thread, who condone Mixon's actions, identify the flavor of cherry Kool Aid as "red?" Raise y'all's hands!

Bruh you starting to sound racist........ and I don't find it funny at all motherphucker real talk I'm starting to feel some kinda way about you homie. Some **** you shouldn't joke about...

If she didn't call him a racial slur or Spit on him then She needs to go to jail for assault and he does as well. While we can't hear any audio we can clearly see her hit him. And the same for him. Now beyond that until testimony is given then we have no real proof of what's being ß
Said because there's no audio.....


I choose to believe what I want just like you choose to believe what you want. Until actual proof is provided everything is SPECULATION.

I better watch myself if I'm James Jackson's Retarded Fake Super Emotional Brother is feeling "a certain way" about me.

 

[supersaiyanshel]

Nobody's saying she's right. She's clearly wrong. Her own actions are criminal in themselves. That's not the point. The point is she was not a physical threat to him in the slightest. His reaction was totally disproportionate to a non-threatening situation.

Just because she's a dumb drunk biītch that slapped him, doesn't warrant the type of response he gave. He literally could have killed her, as three facial fractures would attest.

Like I said before, how people react to this a litmus test for your functioning status in a civilized society. In general, low-impulse control, less successful, less adaptable, and generally lower socioeconomic, lower intelligence, and low social-IQ people find justification in his disproportionate response, and some even state they would have done the same.

The more successful, more intelligent, higher status individuals will understand the criminal nature of his response.

And how many of these more intelligent, higher status individuals condemn cops when they shoot unarmed black men, sometimes as they are literally running away ?

Pants up don't loot.

Actually they do, except when they do it, they loot ppls pensions, 401 ks, and savings.

 

[The Franchise]

Nobody's saying she's right. She's clearly wrong. Her own actions are criminal in themselves. That's not the point. The point is she was not a physical threat to him in the slightest. His reaction was totally disproportionate to a non-threatening situation.

Just because she's a dumb drunk biītch that slapped him, doesn't warrant the type of response he gave. He literally could have killed her, as three facial fractures would attest.

Like I said before, how people react to this a litmus test for your functioning status in a civilized society. In general, low-impulse control, less successful, less adaptable, and generally lower socioeconomic, lower intelligence, and low social-IQ people find justification in his disproportionate response, and some even state they would have done the same.

The more successful, more intelligent, higher status individuals will understand the criminal nature of his response.

You're wasting your time attempting to explain the subtlety of disproportionate response to guys with IQs equal to a bowl of Fruity Pebbles. These morons consider themselves so well-versed in the laws of self-defense that they're practically frothing from their permanently agape mouths hoping that an old lady bumps into them at the grocery store so they can beat her to death.

Everyone with a brain has already conceded that the girl is a stupid bytch. That's not the issue, but imbeciles can't deal in anything other than black and white. "He wrong. She wrong. He can beats her to death."

 

[rt cane]

Nobody's saying she's right. She's clearly wrong. Her own actions are criminal in themselves. That's not the point. The point is she was not a physical threat to him in the slightest. His reaction was totally disproportionate to a non-threatening situation.

Just because she's a dumb drunk biītch that slapped him, doesn't warrant the type of response he gave. He literally could have killed her, as three facial fractures would attest.

Like I said before, how people react to this a litmus test for your functioning status in a civilized society. In general, low-impulse control, less successful, less adaptable, and generally lower socioeconomic, lower intelligence, and low social-IQ people find justification in his disproportionate response, and some even state they would have done the same.

The more successful, more intelligent, higher status individuals will understand the criminal nature of his response.

And how many of these more intelligent, higher status individuals condemn cops when they shoot unarmed black men, sometimes as they are literally running away ?

Pants up don't loot.

Actually they do, except when they do it, they loot ppls pensions, 401 ks, and savings.

Now you are talking about the bankers, the real criminals, too bad they are protected.

 

[supersaiyanshel]

Nobody's saying she's right. She's clearly wrong. Her own actions are criminal in themselves. That's not the point. The point is she was not a physical threat to him in the slightest. His reaction was totally disproportionate to a non-threatening situation.

Just because she's a dumb drunk biītch that slapped him, doesn't warrant the type of response he gave. He literally could have killed her, as three facial fractures would attest.

Like I said before, how people react to this a litmus test for your functioning status in a civilized society. In general, low-impulse control, less successful, less adaptable, and generally lower socioeconomic, lower intelligence, and low social-IQ people find justification in his disproportionate response, and some even state they would have done the same.

The more successful, more intelligent, higher status individuals will understand the criminal nature of his response.

And how many of these more intelligent, higher status individuals condemn cops when they shoot unarmed black men, sometimes as they are literally running away ?

Pants up don't loot.

Actually they do, except when they do it, they loot ppls pensions, 401 ks, and savings.

Now you are talking about the bankers, the real criminals, too bad they are protected.

Teflon.

 

[Tad Footeball]

Nobody's saying she's right. She's clearly wrong. Her own actions are criminal in themselves. That's not the point. The point is she was not a physical threat to him in the slightest. His reaction was totally disproportionate to a non-threatening situation.

Just because she's a dumb drunk biītch that slapped him, doesn't warrant the type of response he gave. He literally could have killed her, as three facial fractures would attest.

Like I said before, how people react to this a litmus test for your functioning status in a civilized society. In general, low-impulse control, less successful, less adaptable, and generally lower socioeconomic, lower intelligence, and low social-IQ people find justification in his disproportionate response, and some even state they would have done the same.

The more successful, more intelligent, higher status individuals will understand the criminal nature of his response.

And how many of these more intelligent, higher status individuals condemn cops when they shoot unarmed black men, sometimes as they are literally running away ?

Pants up don't loot.

Actually they do, except when they do it, they loot ppls pensions, 401 ks, and savings.

Now you are talking about the bankers, the real criminals, too bad they are protected.

If one of you m-f'ers mention Bernie Sanders then I'm deleting this thread and apologizing to Joe Mixon for sullying his reputation by associating his name with the turns we took here.

That said, an old woman in a wheelchair cut in front of me at the Publix deli this morning. She's now an old woman in a Blue Lot bodybag. Real men don't discriminate whose *** they beat.

 

[PSU Cane]

She is a grown woman and not a child. I think he acted appropriately because as a so called black man in America we get killed by our own people and we know the reputation of whites when it comes to killing us. They killed 98% of the so called Indians and killed over 500 million of us Israelites in building this country .So we must be careful and be ready to act when put in harms way.

That might be the most ridiculous and dumbest post i have ever read on this board.

 

[Mikesmith29150]

So called blacks,Indians, and Latinos are the true Israelites. The curses in the book of Deuteronomy 28:15-68 proves this. The so called Indians are really Gad and Reuben. The so called blacks are the tribe of Judah. Again the so called white man killed 500 million of us during slavery. We came to slavery for breaking Gods LAW.We are the 144k the Bible says that must be sealed. Then we do we get our revenge. This is the big secret until now

 

[OriginalCanesCanesCanes]

Nobody's saying she's right. She's clearly wrong. Her own actions are criminal in themselves. That's not the point. The point is she was not a physical threat to him in the slightest. His reaction was totally disproportionate to a non-threatening situation.

Just because she's a dumb drunk biītch that slapped him, doesn't warrant the type of response he gave. He literally could have killed her, as three facial fractures would attest.

Like I said before, how people react to this a litmus test for your functioning status in a civilized society. In general, low-impulse control, less successful, less adaptable, and generally lower socioeconomic, lower intelligence, and low social-IQ people find justification in his disproportionate response, and some even state they would have done the same.

The more successful, more intelligent, higher status individuals will understand the criminal nature of his response.

And how many of these more intelligent, higher status individuals condemn cops when they shoot unarmed black men, sometimes as they are literally running away ?

First, that's an unanswerable question. Second, it's totally irrelevant and doesn't negate, in any way, what I posted.

 

[supersaiyanshel]

Nobody's saying she's right. She's clearly wrong. Her own actions are criminal in themselves. That's not the point. The point is she was not a physical threat to him in the slightest. His reaction was totally disproportionate to a non-threatening situation.

Just because she's a dumb drunk biītch that slapped him, doesn't warrant the type of response he gave. He literally could have killed her, as three facial fractures would attest.

Like I said before, how people react to this a litmus test for your functioning status in a civilized society. In general, low-impulse control, less successful, less adaptable, and generally lower socioeconomic, lower intelligence, and low social-IQ people find justification in his disproportionate response, and some even state they would have done the same.

The more successful, more intelligent, higher status individuals will understand the criminal nature of his response.

And how many of these more intelligent, higher status individuals condemn cops when they shoot unarmed black men, sometimes as they are literally running away ?

First, that's an unanswerable question. Second, it's totally irrelevant and doesn't negate, in any way, what I posted.

Not irrelevant at all. You're talking about disproportionate responses to not threatening situations and how civilized situations should condemn them. It's an absolutely legitimate question to ask.

You are correct in saying its an unanswerable question, but it's no more assimptive than saying "in general, low-impulse control, less successful, less adaptable, and generally lower socioeconomic, lower intelligence, and low social-IQ people find justification in his disproportionate response."

 

[rt cane]

So called blacks,Indians, and Latinos are the true Israelites. The curses in the book of Deuteronomy 28:15-68 proves this. The so called Indians are really Gad and Reuben. The so called blacks are the tribe of Judah. Again the so called white man killed 500 million of us during slavery. We came to slavery for breaking Gods LAW.We are the 144k the Bible says that must be sealed. Then we do we get our revenge. This is the big secret until now

Does Coach Richt go to your church?

 

[Mikesmith29150]

It would be to a fool. I can take the Bible and prove along with the Slave trade time line that the blacks,Latinos and so called Indians are Israelites. Why do you think them fake Jews in Gods land calls themselves ****** and Israeli. The name *** is short for Judah. The Bible says the Jews are Black Lamentations 5:10,Jeremiah 14:2,Revelation 1:14-15. The Bible says that the Real Jews would go to slavery on SHIPS Deuteronomy 28:68. The word Egypt in that verse means BONDAGE. Exodus 20:2 proves that. One of the secrets to the Bible is a lot of words have double meaning. Job 11:6. Deuteronomy 28:15-68 gives all the cures that would be on us that we would hate each other our women would get raped that we would serve other Gods the wood cross of Christianity and the Kabul stone of Islam. The curses said that we would depend on our enemies for everything that we would be called different names until we REPENT then we will put all Nations on earth in Bondage.Revelation 13:10. Isaiah 14:1-2 says the same thing .The Israelites are the Saints. Psalms 50:5

 

[Cribby]

Got to love the bible, anybody can twist it any way they want to help their story. I guess that's why there's thousands of religions.

 

[amanan28]

It would be to a fool. I can take the Bible and prove along with the Slave trade time line that the blacks,Latinos and so called Indians are Israelites. Why do you think them fake Jews in Gods land calls themselves ****** and Israeli. The name *** is short for Judah. The Bible says the Jews are Black Lamentations 5:10,Jeremiah 14:2,Revelation 1:14-15. The Bible says that the Real Jews would go to slavery on SHIPS Deuteronomy 28:68. The word Egypt in that verse means BONDAGE. Exodus 20:2 proves that. One of the secrets to the Bible is a lot of words have double meaning. Job 11:6. Deuteronomy 28:15-68 gives all the cures that would be on us that we would hate each other our women would get raped that we would serve other Gods the wood cross of Christianity and the Kabul stone of Islam. The curses said that we would depend on our enemies for everything that we would be called different names until we REPENT then we will put all Nations on earth in Bondage.Revelation 13:10. Isaiah 14:1-2 says the same thing .The Israelites are the Saints. Psalms 50:5

Not sure anybody gives a ****...tone it down a little man

 

[MovingZen]

It would be to a fool. I can take the Bible and prove along with the Slave trade time line that the blacks,Latinos and so called Indians are Israelites. Why do you think them fake Jews in Gods land calls themselves ****** and Israeli. The name *** is short for Judah. The Bible says the Jews are Black Lamentations 5:10,Jeremiah 14:2,Revelation 1:14-15. The Bible says that the Real Jews would go to slavery on SHIPS Deuteronomy 28:68. The word Egypt in that verse means BONDAGE. Exodus 20:2 proves that. One of the secrets to the Bible is a lot of words have double meaning. Job 11:6. Deuteronomy 28:15-68 gives all the cures that would be on us that we would hate each other our women would get raped that we would serve other Gods the wood cross of Christianity and the Kabul stone of Islam. The curses said that we would depend on our enemies for everything that we would be called different names until we REPENT then we will put all Nations on earth in Bondage.Revelation 13:10. Isaiah 14:1-2 says the same thing .The Israelites are the Saints. Psalms 50:5

Too much bible, did not read.

 

[OriginalCanesCanesCanes]

You're wasting your time attempting to explain the subtlety of disproportionate response to guys with IQs equal to a bowl of Fruity Pebbles. These morons consider themselves so well-versed in the laws of self-defense that they're practically frothing from their permanently agape mouths hoping that an old lady bumps into them at the grocery store so they can beat her to death.

Everyone with a brain has already conceded that the girl is a stupid bytch. That's not the issue, but imbeciles can't deal in anything other than black and white. "He wrong. She wrong. He can beats her to death."

You are correct. Not that hard of a concept to understand when you get right down to it. Some people are **** bent to oppress themselves with their own stupidity and they don't even realize it.

 

[Brooklyndee]

You spit within 2 inches of me, let alone and I'm knocking teeth out of your mouth.

Some of yall excuse women for everything.

I don't condone beating on the females but I aint gonna let one spit on me and slap me with no repercussion.

Call me what you want

It's a very tiresome argument really. Men constantly being put in lose lose situations. I personally have never put my hands on a woman but I do agree there is a certain point they can take it. Did he have to do that clearly the answer is no. But if that's the argument is did he have to do that then it could apply for anyone he's physically superior to. Women shouldn't be allowed to just get a free pass for everything. Personally I think all of that contributes to why there is so many broken homes now. Alot of women simply think like men these days. But when they get a man to treat em that way all of a sudden it's woe is me. No different from dukes. I'm sorry but if you wanna act like a man than I can't get to upset about you getting treated like one. This was always a valid argument because women acted like women not homeboys.no such thing as a free pass.

 

[Mikesmith29150]

No God doesn't allow us to go to church with the heathens .Paul almost got put to death for that allegation in the Book of Acts

 

[Dingaan1828]

She is a grown woman and not a child. I think he acted appropriately because as a so called black man in America we get killed by our own people and we know the reputation of whites when it comes to killing us. They killed 98% of the so called Indians and killed over 500 million of us Israelites in building this country .So we must be careful and be ready to act when put in harms way.

Ah...so, what you're basically saying is that you are insane.