- Joined
- Sep 16, 2016
- Messages
- 4,260
gutz is on cis
hes right. his real mistake was responding to that clown on twitter. the fake coach handler
@hoops156 in my opinion, ivins responded on twitter correctly. but it came across to some people wrong. I read it as if an all star game called me for a review, how am I going to give a glaring review if I am not allowed at the games to review? ivins. never said he was going to write/give a bad review.
@CaneSince4Ever ivins NEVER threatened to write a negative. that is a fact. he said if an all star rep asked him about an MNW player do you think he was going to write a glowing review? meaning, how can I write a review if I have no access to their games
HOW THE **** CAN YOU SAY WITH CERTAINTY THAT'S WHAT HE MEANS? DO YOU KNOW HIM PERSONALLY THEN YOU NEED TO PUT "IN YOUR OPINION" THAT'S WHAT IT MEANS DON'T WRITE THAT **** LIKE IT'S A F.UCKI.NG FACT.
IF YOU'RE SUPPORTING IRVINS BEHAVIOR EITHER YOU'RE A RACIST POS OR YOU'RE A RACIST POS AND DON'T KNOW IT. SEE HOW THAT WORKS WHEN I DO IT I DON'T KNOW YOU HOW CAN I SAY FOR A FACT THAT YOU'RE A RACIST POS. IT'S AN OPINION.
A REASONABLE PERSON WOULD LOOK AT HIS POST OF IRVIN'S " DO YOU THINK I'M GOING TO GIVE KIDS FROM MNW A GLOWING REVIEW" AS A WAY OF SAYING HE'S NOT GOING TO HAVE ANYTHING POSITIVE TO SAY ABOUT KIDS FROM THAT SCHOOL.
WHY SAY SOMETHING LIKE THAT WHY BRING THE KIDS UP PERIOD. YOU'RE ARGUING WITH AN ADULT WHY NOT SAY I'M NOT GOING TO BE ABLE TO GIVE ANY REVIEWS ON THIS SCHOOL BECAUSE I'M NOT ABLE TO SEE THEM PRACTICE ETC TO GIVE A PROPER EVALUATION. HE'S A REPORTER HE KNOWS HOW TO WORD THINGS APPROPRIATELY HE WORDED IT THAT WAY BECAUSE HE MEANT IT THAT WAY. HE'S A F.UCC.ING POS AND THAT COACH IS A **** HEAD FOR NOT SETTING A GOOD EXAMPLE FOR THE KIDS HE COACHES.
THIS THREAD NEEDS TO BE CLOSED I'M GOING TO START CALLING YOU MOTHER F.UCK.ERS. OUT ON YOUR BULLS.HYT IN A MINUTE. STARTING TO **** ME OFF WITH YALL F.UC.K ***** ****.
Situation was handled terribly by both parties. At the end of the day the kids are the ones who are hurt most by stuff like this. Media is the best exposure for kids regardless of how good your program is.
247 is a premier recruiting service. Unless Ivins is sending film to rival schools why on earth would you damage that relationship? I’d be ****ed if my kid was a low profile recruit trying to flash and garner more attention. Ivins can’t say he’s going to look down at kids from that school. That’s f***ed up
Andrew Ivins has nothing to do with how the players are ranked on 247. He is a journalist that calls kids up and ask what their favorite food is and get fluff for the school he is covering. He gives the people above his opinion but he doesn't control the outcome of rankings.
I'm not going to argue with you over MNW after this post. You think they have talent like St Thomas. You think because they won a state title that makes them talented. They had 5 losses and i know who smacked their *** around.
The last top player we got from there was Artie Burns. Hopefully Fleming is the next but over 10 year span. We might be able to say we got two of their best players.
I agree Atwell would've been better than Ezzard. Yet that doesn't put him, Bethal or Brooks on Burns/Flemings level. Losing the top players and landing the marginal guys doesn't make you a feeder school. Not every 3 star will turn out like Baker.
@hoops156 in my opinion, ivins responded on twitter correctly. but it came across to some people wrong. I read it as if an all star game called me for a review, how am I going to give a glaring review if I am not allowed at the games to review? ivins. never said he was going to write/give a bad review.
EXACTLY...First off, I don’t have a dog in this fight. But if what you are saying were the case he wouldn’t have used the adjective “glowing” when he made his statement.
By saying “do you think I’m going to leave a glowing review” he was clearly implying that he wouldn’t leave a good review for MNW kids because of this incident. If he meant it the way you are taking it, he would have said “how am I going to leave a review” or “do you think I’ll be able to leave a review” or even just “do you think I will leave a review”, but by adding in “glowing” it completely changes the intent.
Ivins was definitely trying to pull his power card, kind of like MNW did apparently.
Thanks for the analysisHOW THE **** CAN YOU SAY WITH CERTAINTY THAT'S WHAT HE MEANS? DO YOU KNOW HIM PERSONALLY THEN YOU NEED TO PUT "IN YOUR OPINION" THAT'S WHAT IT MEANS DON'T WRITE THAT **** LIKE IT'S A F.UCKI.NG FACT.
IF YOU'RE SUPPORTING IRVINS BEHAVIOR EITHER YOU'RE A RACIST POS OR YOU'RE A RACIST POS AND DON'T KNOW IT. SEE HOW THAT WORKS WHEN I DO IT I DON'T KNOW YOU HOW CAN I SAY FOR A FACT THAT YOU'RE A RACIST POS. IT'S AN OPINION.
A REASONABLE PERSON WOULD LOOK AT HIS POST OF IRVIN'S " DO YOU THINK I'M GOING TO GIVE KIDS FROM MNW A GLOWING REVIEW" AS A WAY OF SAYING HE'S NOT GOING TO HAVE ANYTHING POSITIVE TO SAY ABOUT KIDS FROM THAT SCHOOL.
WHY SAY SOMETHING LIKE THAT WHY BRING THE KIDS UP PERIOD. YOU'RE ARGUING WITH AN ADULT WHY NOT SAY I'M NOT GOING TO BE ABLE TO GIVE ANY REVIEWS ON THIS SCHOOL BECAUSE I'M NOT ABLE TO SEE THEM PRACTICE ETC TO GIVE A PROPER EVALUATION. HE'S A REPORTER HE KNOWS HOW TO WORD THINGS APPROPRIATELY HE WORDED IT THAT WAY BECAUSE HE MEANT IT THAT WAY. HE'S A F.UCC.ING POS AND THAT COACH IS A **** HEAD FOR NOT SETTING A GOOD EXAMPLE FOR THE KIDS HE COACHES.
THIS THREAD NEEDS TO BE CLOSED I'M GOING TO START CALLING YOU MOTHER F.UCK.ERS. OUT ON YOUR BULLS.HYT IN A MINUTE. STARTING TO **** ME OFF WITH YALL F.UC.K ***** ****.
First off, I don’t have a dog in this fight. But if what you are saying were the case he wouldn’t have used the adjective “glowing” when he made his statement.
By saying “do you think I’m going to leave a glowing review” he was clearly implying that he wouldn’t leave a good review for MNW kids because of this incident. If he meant it the way you are taking it, he would have said “how am I going to leave a review” or “do you think I’ll be able to leave a review” or even just “do you think I will leave a review”, but by adding in “glowing” it completely changes the intent.
Ivins was definitely trying to pull his power card, kind of like MNW did apparently.
You left the all Caps button on again..point well taking thoHOW THE **** CAN YOU SAY WITH CERTAINTY THAT'S WHAT HE MEANS? DO YOU KNOW HIM PERSONALLY THEN YOU NEED TO PUT "IN YOUR OPINION" THAT'S WHAT IT MEANS DON'T WRITE THAT **** LIKE IT'S A F.UCKI.NG FACT.
IF YOU'RE SUPPORTING IRVINS BEHAVIOR EITHER YOU'RE A RACIST POS OR YOU'RE A RACIST POS AND DON'T KNOW IT. SEE HOW THAT WORKS WHEN I DO IT I DON'T KNOW YOU HOW CAN I SAY FOR A FACT THAT YOU'RE A RACIST POS. IT'S AN OPINION.
A REASONABLE PERSON WOULD LOOK AT HIS POST OF IRVIN'S " DO YOU THINK I'M GOING TO GIVE KIDS FROM MNW A GLOWING REVIEW" AS A WAY OF SAYING HE'S NOT GOING TO HAVE ANYTHING POSITIVE TO SAY ABOUT KIDS FROM THAT SCHOOL.
WHY SAY SOMETHING LIKE THAT WHY BRING THE KIDS UP PERIOD. YOU'RE ARGUING WITH AN ADULT WHY NOT SAY I'M NOT GOING TO BE ABLE TO GIVE ANY REVIEWS ON THIS SCHOOL BECAUSE I'M NOT ABLE TO SEE THEM PRACTICE ETC TO GIVE A PROPER EVALUATION. HE'S A REPORTER HE KNOWS HOW TO WORD THINGS APPROPRIATELY HE WORDED IT THAT WAY BECAUSE HE MEANT IT THAT WAY. HE'S A F.UCC.ING POS AND THAT COACH IS A **** HEAD FOR NOT SETTING A GOOD EXAMPLE FOR THE KIDS HE COACHES.
THIS THREAD NEEDS TO BE CLOSED I'M GOING TO START CALLING YOU MOTHER F.UCK.ERS. OUT ON YOUR BULLS.HYT IN A MINUTE. STARTING TO **** ME OFF WITH YALL F.UC.K ***** ****.
This is such a weak take IMO. Go back and look at exactly how Ivins phrased that tweet. And mind you, it was in response to being threatened with the be careful or this could cost you a lot more than a spring game:@CaneSince4Ever ivins NEVER threatened to write a negative. that is a fact. he said if an all star rep asked him about an MNW player do you think he was going to write a glowing review? meaning, how can I write a review if I have no access to their games