- Joined
- Nov 28, 2016
- Messages
- 8,734
Haiti, Sudan and Afghanistan are not capitalist.
Furthermore, capitalism is not a form of government.
Weird, because we have more lobbyist than politicians.
Haiti, Sudan and Afghanistan are not capitalist.
Furthermore, capitalism is not a form of government.
If you genuinely believe that any of those three countries have market economies, then I don’t know what else to say other than your beliefs are mistaken and I’ll leave it at that.
Socialism, communism and all other forms of command or centrally planned economies and the forms of government that are required to direct such economies have wrought infinitely more destruction than capitalism.
Wife was denied.. Worked at Panera Bread
I don't know a single Republican, libertarian or other that thinks there should not be a safety net for hard working Americans in any time of need. What I & most are opposed to is the able bodied people who juke the system, not work a day in their lives, living off Uncle Sam. BIG DIFFERENCE and you are misrepresenting it as a partisan because I know you are smart enough to know the difference.Don't know your affiliation, but it's taken a catastrophe for many Republican members to need the same services they call, Socialism, to see what and the affects are on everyday working Americans. The Republicans need/needed the money from Safety Net programs to fund Corporate/Wealthy Socialism Welfare. Now that you need federal assistance, I'm not hearing the rallying cry Socialism. Now be a real dedicated Republican and not apply for or accept Socialism dollars.
Red or Blue it doesn't matter with this stuff. In my entire life, I have never seen Government do anything efficiently. It's the whole bloated, red tape, multi level approval way of doing things that is permanently broken. You'd still have the same cluster F if Clinton were elected. Most Government workers are grossly incompetent and don't care because they can't even be fired for performance.Vote 2020
if Sweden Norway Finland Denmark South Korea didn’t have the Us military basically be their military the last 50 years, would they be able to practice socialism? Thats a mighty pricey expense they have been able to right off.Sweden, Norway, Finland, Denmark, South Korea, Japan are very socialist and are some of the more robust and egalitarian economies.
On the other end, Venezuela, Cuba, are also those but they aren't given access to the American economy, which puts then at a disadvantage and Venezuela economy is entirely based on the price of oil.
Each state has it's own case, it's usually whatever works best for them.
I'm in Canada, zero people are getting denied, the Gov is giving out billions of dollars and not many people are stressing.
Banks are giving deferred payment on mortgage, landlords for rent, commercial and residential, it's pretty crazy how much everyone is working together and I'm self employed.
Red or Blue it doesn't matter with this stuff. In my entire life, I have never seen Government do anything efficiently. It's the whole bloated, red tape, multi level approval way of doing things that is permanently broken. You'd still have the same cluster F if Clinton were elected. Most Government workers are grossly incompetent and don't care because they can't even be fired for performance.
if Sweden Norway Finland Denmark South Korea didn’t have the Us military basically be their military the last 50 years, would they be able to practice socialism? Thats a mighty pricey expense they have been able to right off.
You do know that social security is YOUR money that you have put in, that you are getting back in the end. If it still exists when you need it....Anyone who denies that giving/receiving government or public assistance is not a form of Socialism is denying reality...and denying the facts
Government/Public assistance whatever it is called is basically a Socialist program
You don't have to have a Socialist government to have some Socialist programs in place like we clearly have had for years
Thank Gawd we have some of these Socialist safety net programs in place like SS, unemployment etc.
Bad ( Socialist welfare ) when others are getting it..... Good & necessary (stimulus) when we are getting them
Now go cash those welfare/stimulus checks and call it whatever makes you happy.....but we ALL know that this Duck is still a Duck...only this time, this Duck is ok because we are the ones getting it.
Who owns the means of production?Anyone who denies that giving/receiving government or public assistance is not a form of Socialism is denying reality...and denying the facts
Government/Public assistance whatever it is called is basically a Socialist program
You don't have to have a Socialist government to have some Socialist programs in place like we clearly have had for years
Thank Gawd we have some of these Socialist safety net programs in place like SS, unemployment etc.
Bad ( Socialist welfare ) when others are getting it..... Good & necessary (stimulus) when we are getting them
Now go cash those welfare/stimulus checks and call it whatever makes you happy.....but we ALL know that this Duck is still a Duck...only this time, this Duck is ok because we are the ones getting it.
if Sweden Norway Finland Denmark South Korea didn’t have the Us military basically be their military the last 50 years, would they be able to practice socialism? Thats a mighty pricey expense they have been able to right off.
if socialists understood economics, they wouldn't be socialists.
I say about 50.Europe has their own army via the EU, America certainly helps, and who's gonna invade them? Russia? This isn't the cold war anymore.
I never said socialism works, I said it depends on the case, no need to get defensive.
My world is pretty good in Canada with universal health care and cheap education with multiple top 50 post secondary institutions, I certainly don't mind it.the major issue with America is they let state owned companies come in and compete and take over, and those companies will never give up the home base, think Huyndai or Kia, meanwhile they do nothing, or very little kn comparison, to protect home base.
At least my opinion, right or wrong. Certainly not gonna convince anyone over internet forums haha opinions are like buttholes right!
And those countries' economies are decidedly capitalist. They have safety nets and welfare systems but to say they're 'socialist' is just plain wrong.if Sweden Norway Finland Denmark South Korea didn’t have the Us military basically be their military the last 50 years, would they be able to practice socialism? Thats a mighty pricey expense they have been able to right off.
if socialists understood economics, they wouldn't be socialists.
Who owns the means of production?
Social programs are not socialist programs.
![]()
Isn’t America Already Kind of Socialist?
No, socialism isn't just more government — it's about democratic ownership and control.www.jacobinmag.com
You are a moron.Don't know your affiliation, but it's taken a catastrophe for many Republican members to need the same services they call, Socialism, to see what and the affects are on everyday working Americans. The Republicans need/needed the money from Safety Net programs to fund Corporate/Wealthy Socialism Welfare. Now that you need federal assistance, I'm not hearing the rallying cry Socialism. Now be a real dedicated Republican and not apply for or accept Socialism dollars.
No it's not.It's not about the means of production.....its about how $ are distributed
When government decides how my $ are to be distributed.....that is a Socialist idea / program
I'm not going to argue semantics.....you want to call your Duck a Pretty Dog with web feet? Fine.....We still know its a Duck