forums

O-line & Running Backs

Advertisement
joeyhh said:
Line is opening holes I could run through. I haven’t played since 1975.
Holes will be tighter (calm down) Vs ACC. Chaney can make his own yards and carry defenders. Parrish can bounce outside. These two are still my guys
Click to expand...
Why tighter? A&M committed to stopping the run and we were able to do enough to make it easy to shred them in the air. Clemson has a very solid line but Duke was able to run effectively against them and not just Leonard.
 
joeyhh said:
Line is opening holes I could run through. I haven’t played since 1975.
Holes will be tighter (calm down) Vs ACC. Chaney can make his own yards and carry defenders. Parrish can bounce outside. These two are still my guys
Click to expand...
I agree those are the two lead horses. Chaney looks healthy and has 3.5 years of P5 strength and conditioning on his frame. His runs look violent and NFL ready. Every tackle seems like it's a TD saver made by a shoelace.
 
OP clearly drinking wine before he writes posts.

"Holes will be tighter in ACC play. I suggest using Johnson for his thickness and speed. I'm looking for the tight ends to really facilitate Johnson hitting those holes hard."
 
hurricaneman said:
OP clearly drinking wine before he writes posts.

"Holes will be tighter in ACC play. I suggest using Johnson for his thickness and speed. I'm looking for the tight ends to really facilitate Johnson hitting those holes hard."
Click to expand...
No wine for Joey
Blue Point Lager
Johnson should get his snaps
 
Advertisement
weather report GIF



er wait
 
Pentagon Cane said:
Why tighter? A&M committed to stopping the run and we were able to do enough to make it easy to shred them in the air. Clemson has a very solid line but Duke was able to run effectively against them and not just Leonard.
Click to expand...
Leonard was the entire run game against Clemson. It’s all they needed though. Our QB is not that mobile.

Our run game vs Clemson will be similar to A&M plus maybe 20-30
 
joeyhh said:
Line is opening holes I could run through. I haven’t played since 1975.
Holes will be tighter (calm down) Vs ACC. Chaney can make his own yards and carry defenders. Parrish can bounce outside. These two are still my guys
Click to expand...
Who in ACC has better DL and LBs than aTM?
 
Advertisement
Empirical Cane said:
Who in ACC has better DL and LBs than aTM?
Click to expand...
Don’t know
aTm shut down the rush. Others can load up the box. I understand that opens things up for TVD but it won’t be a rushing feast like Bethune & Temple.
As D’s tighten up, I want Chaney/Parrish at the top of the chart. That was my point.
 
Pentagon Cane said:
And shredded them in the air and TVD had mostly very clean pockets. Only Clemson and FSU have DLs that could be a concern. This line should shred everybody else.
Click to expand...
Don’t disagree. Our O-line is beastly.
‘It will be a bit tougher than it has been’
Referencing Miami O, Temple, Bethune and the giant holes our RB’s had.
 
Back
Top