forums

NIL and One time transfer rule tabled

TheOriginalCane said:
Holy ****e...how do you assume that the author IS A WHITE GUY? Are you ******* kidding me?

It's the little things about your racism that add up.
Click to expand...

The guy in the original tweet, genius. His picture is literally ******* on it, I'm not assuming anything.
 
Advertisement
RightSaidFred said:
It's ambiguous because the word means two nearly-opposite things, as I already explained. He could be saying they're taking it up for discussion now, or he could be saying that they're taking it up at a later time.
Click to expand...
The British definition of ****ed is different too, but you don't take umbrage at people using that.
 
RightSaidFred said:
It's ambiguous because the word means two nearly-opposite things, as I already explained. He could be saying they're taking it up for discussion now, or he could be saying that they're taking it up at a later time.
Click to expand...


Except that I've proven to you that the dictionary definition AND the parliamentary procedure definition, IN THE UNITED STATES, are identical and mean only ONE definition.

There is no "regional US" definition or usage that is identical to the British definition and usage.

Bugger off, you *****.
 
RightSaidFred said:
You're really putting an effort in to this. How long did you spend looking this **** up just to try to look smart on an internet forum, smart guy? By the way, congratulations on being a government worker. We would be lost without all our bureaucrats.

No, the "vast majority of Americans" did NOT learn the word "tabled" from Robert's Rules of Order, because the vast majority of Americans have never heard of Robert's Rule of Order.

But in appreciation of your effort, let me match it. Roberts Rules of Order was written in 1876, according to the all-knowing google. The word "tabled" was first used in 1653, and it had the "British" definition. So your book might have added the second definition to the word, but it didn't replace the first.
Click to expand...


According to Google, I spent 0.52 seconds "looking this ****e up". It's literally the first result when you type "parliamentary procedure table". You, too, could have learned something new by spending a half-second on research before you bloviated and blamed the CBS Sports writer.

Nowhere did I say I was a "government worker". I am not a "government worker". But, as per usual, you tried to do your pompous and arrogant routine, and it backfired on you.

And, yes, the vast majority of Americans have participated in at least one activity in which parliamentary procedure was used to govern the meetings. They may not have read the book on Robert's Rules of Order, but they've come into contact with it.

It's nice to see that you are belatedly trying to do some research before shooting off your mouth. Doesn't change the fact that the American and British usages are different. But, hey, good effort.
 
RightSaidFred said:
The guy in the original tweet, genius. His picture is literally ******* on it, I'm not assuming anything.
Click to expand...

First, you have no idea of whether that picture is the actual guy. You can, literally, post any picture on your Twitter account.

Second, the issue is not whether the guy is or is not white. The issue is that YOU felt compelled to include his race in your post. You are the problem, not the original guy who tweeted.
 
Advertisement
Dwinstitles said:
I just want to know about the rule not the soap opera novela stuff
Click to expand...


The NCAA wants a uniform federal standard to work off of. The US Congress is known for doing nothing. So the NCAA waits around while various state laws become operative. It's not a good recipe.
 
305to954 said:
If you had the grades you could’ve gotten another scolly at another institution that would’ve given u a scolly..and i doubt you’d have to sit out a semester
Click to expand...
So don't sign a contract. Be a walk on and see if they give you something.

You also have the option to just attend school and drop sports altogether.

Schools don't give the same amount for academic "scolly's" it will vary. Also, maybe similar to football is a class I take in Florida may not transfer to another school and they make you retake it so in essence that counts for sitting out a semester. Unless of course that has changed.
 
Re: NIL
It's law in Florida effective July1 and 5 other states have passed bills. I believe we're at 14 others that have introduced bills in 2021 and over a dozen more have previously. Iowa is expected to pass soon also with an effective date of July 1 and California is expected to move their date to 2021.

As of today the only recourse the NCAA would have is an emergency junction halting Florida but this play doesn't work if multiple other states, especially California match with July 1 effective dates. The state will pull funding from schools if they don't allow the athletes to earn endorsements, no matter if it's still against "NCAA rules" at that time.

At this point the writing is pretty much on the wall, the two most likely scenarios I see are either Congress passes one of the federal bills that have been introduced or the Uniform Law Commission passes a set of legislation that the NCAA then adopts as their blanket set of rules. I think the odds are more likely than not that this becomes legal nationally by this summer.
 
apfenny3 said:
Re: NIL
It's law in Florida effective July1 and 5 other states have passed bills. I believe we're at 14 others that have introduced bills in 2021 and over a dozen more have previously. Iowa is expected to pass soon also with an effective date of July 1 and California is expected to move their date to 2021.

As of today the only recourse the NCAA would have is an emergency junction halting Florida but this play doesn't work if multiple other states, especially California match with July 1 effective dates. The state will pull funding from schools if they don't allow the athletes to earn endorsements, no matter if it's still against "NCAA rules" at that time.

At this point the writing is pretty much on the wall, the two most likely scenarios I see are either Congress passes one of the federal bills that have been introduced or the Uniform Law Commission passes a set of legislation that the NCAA then adopts as their blanket set of rules. I think the odds are more likely than not that this becomes legal nationally by this summer.
Click to expand...

Everything you say is correct. I would just add that I don't know if the states have as much leverage as they think they do. Let's say the NCAA decides to go scorched earth and declare Gaytor players ineligible who enter into NIL arrangements...if the Gaytors don't want to forfeit games and agree to sit the players, and then the State of Florida's option is to halt funding for UiF...I just don't see that option actually happening.

I do think that, say, UiF would go the "Memphis" route, where they choose to play the players anyhow. I think you might see a "test case", where, UiF lets one player do an NIL deal, and then they play him no matter what the NCAA says.

This ****e is gonna get crazy. We need to buckle up.
 
Advertisement
Back
Top