forums

Newly proposed NCAA rule would hurt

P

PalyCane

Sophomore
Premium
Joined
Nov 3, 2011
Messages
1,210
It's being reported that the NCAA is preparing to implement a new rule that would eliminate eligibility for all players who are more than 5 years past their HS graduation. The rule would take effect immediately with no grand fathering for 2026per reports.

This would impact Mo Toure, Ryan Rodriguez, Chase Smith and Cooper Barkate. Yikes

 
Last edited:
PalyCane said:
It's being reported that the NCAA is preparing to implement a new rule that would eliminate eligibility for all players who are more than 5 years past their HS graduation. The rule would take effect immediately with no grand fathering for 2026per reports.

This would impact Mo Toure, Ryan Rodriguez, Chase Smith and Cooper Barkdale. Yikes

Click to expand...

I don’t understand this rule as it makes no sense. We are not seeing 30 and 35 year old players take scholarships away from kids. We are also not seeing 27 to 35 year olds dominate college football.

99% of kids that are over 25 had a history of severe injuries.
 
All players that are actively competing on rosters with eligibility aren’t going to be affected.

The “no grandfathering” is not in reference to players that are currently on teams, its in reference to players who’s eligibility ran out at the end of the 2026. Those players aren’t getting an extra year.

All of those canes will be eligible regardless of whether or not this passes. They are essentially competing under the “old model” of eligibility. They are specifically saying it’s not retroactive, which is fine for guys like Toure who still have legitimate eligibility, but a bad thing for a guy like, say, Diego Pavia.
 
AboutTheU05 said:
NCAA will just get butt****ed in court like they always do. The organization is a dead man walking.
Click to expand...


Yeah, there is absolutely no legal justification for this type of a mechanical rule on eligibility. The same courts that have REPEATEDLY ruled in favor of student-athletes will follow the guidance of the very anti-antitrust Supreme Court (and its balancing tests).
 
DubCaliCane said:
All players that are actively competing on rosters with eligibility aren’t going to be affected.

The “no grandfathering” is not in reference to players that are currently on teams, its in reference to players who’s eligibility ran out at the end of the 2026. Those players aren’t getting an extra year.

All of those canes will be eligible regardless of whether or not this passes. They are essentially competing under the “old model” of eligibility. They are specifically saying it’s not retroactive, which is fine for guys like Toure who still have legitimate eligibility, but a bad thing for a guy like, say, Diego Pavia.
Click to expand...

Hopefully that's true.

However a noted sports atty seems to be saying it will affect players who have exhausted their eligibility "this year". More details will be forthcoming of course.

 
1777329761601.gif
 
PalyCane said:
Hopefully that's true.

However a noted sports atty seems to be saying it will affect players who have exhausted their eligibility "this year". More details will be forthcoming of course.

Click to expand...

No imo this is saying if your eligibility is CURREN exhausted entering this yr (like you already played 4 for 4) then you don’t get a new 5th yr of eligibility because that would be the new rule.

how this would effect CURRENTLY eligibility players, I doubt there would be any change nor would one succeed in court especially for someone’s final year.

This proposal isn’t to eliminate eligibility from currently eligible players. It’s to ensure currently ineligible players wouldn’t gain eligibility by this rule change
 
PalyCane said:
It's being reported that the NCAA is preparing to implement a new rule that would eliminate eligibility for all players who are more than 5 years past their HS graduation. The rule would take effect immediately with no grand fathering for 2026per reports.

This would impact Mo Toure, Ryan Rodriguez, Chase Smith and Cooper Barkate. Yikes

Click to expand...

literally all of Indiana's roster lol
 
Yeah, that’s what I’m saying. Toure, Rodriguez, Barkate, Smith, etc. have not exhausted their eligibility this year. They still have active eligibility under the current NCAA model.
PalyCane said:
Hopefully that's true.

However a noted sports atty seems to be saying it will affect players who have exhausted their eligibility "this year". More details will be forthcoming of course.

Click to expand...
 
DubCaliCane said:
All players that are actively competing on rosters with eligibility aren’t going to be affected.

The “no grandfathering” is not in reference to players that are currently on teams, its in reference to players who’s eligibility ran out at the end of the 2026. Those players aren’t getting an extra year.

All of those canes will be eligible regardless of whether or not this passes. They are essentially competing under the “old model” of eligibility. They are specifically saying it’s not retroactive, which is fine for guys like Toure who still have legitimate eligibility, but a bad thing for a guy like, say, Diego Pavia.
Click to expand...
This.
 
Back
Top