NCAA Show Cause

UMFarArcher

All-ACC
Joined
Nov 4, 2011
Messages
18,631
Chip Kelly has one.

Our butts still tingling from the last NCAA violation.

Don't see him coming to UM. Fun to talk about, fun to ponder on.

But when the rubber meets the road, he'll be disqualified here at UM.
 
Advertisement
Chip Kelly has one.

Our butts still tingling from the last NCAA violation.

Don't see him coming to UM. Fun to talk about, fun to ponder on.

But when the rubber meets the road, he'll be disqualified here at UM.

Chip does not have a Show cause

Also the NCAA found that Chip Kelly was not aware or involved in the illegal recruitment of Lyles. The NCAA stated that he should have been monitoring his coaches better. So Oregon got hit with failure to monitor.
 
Chip Kelly has one.

Our butts still tingling from the last NCAA violation.

Don't see him coming to UM. Fun to talk about, fun to ponder on.

But when the rubber meets the road, he'll be disqualified here at UM.

Chip does not have a Show cause

Also the NCAA found that Chip Kelly was not aware or involved in the illegal recruitment of Lyles. The NCAA stated that he should have been monitoring his coaches better. So Oregon got hit with failure to monitor.

I'm fairly certain he received one. Although, it may have expired somewhere around early 2015, allowing schools to bypass explaining themselves to the NCAA shmucks.
 
Chip Kelly has one.

Our butts still tingling from the last NCAA violation.

Don't see him coming to UM. Fun to talk about, fun to ponder on.

But when the rubber meets the road, he'll be disqualified here at UM.

Chip does not have a Show cause

Also the NCAA found that Chip Kelly was not aware or involved in the illegal recruitment of Lyles. The NCAA stated that he should have been monitoring his coaches better. So Oregon got hit with failure to monitor.

Of course he has a show clause. Just google is. Have you been living under a rock?
 
He did have a show cause but it's since expired. I do agree with the sentiment that it would probably prevent UM from seriously pursuing him though.
 
Chip Kelly has one.

Our butts still tingling from the last NCAA violation.

Don't see him coming to UM. Fun to talk about, fun to ponder on.

But when the rubber meets the road, he'll be disqualified here at UM.

Chip does not have a Show cause

Also the NCAA found that Chip Kelly was not aware or involved in the illegal recruitment of Lyles. The NCAA stated that he should have been monitoring his coaches better. So Oregon got hit with failure to monitor.

Of course he has a show clause. Just google is. Have you been living under a rock?

He has no Show Clause. That expired long ago
 
Chip Kelly has one.

Our butts still tingling from the last NCAA violation.

Don't see him coming to UM. Fun to talk about, fun to ponder on.

But when the rubber meets the road, he'll be disqualified here at UM.

Chip does not have a Show cause

Also the NCAA found that Chip Kelly was not aware or involved in the illegal recruitment of Lyles. The NCAA stated that he should have been monitoring his coaches better. So Oregon got hit with failure to monitor.

I'm fairly certain he received one. Although, it may have expired somewhere around early 2015, allowing schools to bypass explaining themselves to the NCAA shmucks.

Expired in 2014
 
Chip Kelly had an 18-month show cause issued to him, that has now expired. Who knows how the administration approaches Chip Kelly. Butch Davis wasn't implicated in the academic scandal, but it's enough for the admin to question if they should hire him. If Kelly has interest in coming here, you don't turn him away. You roll the dice.

But I see Chip heading over to USCw.
 
CK received an 18-month Show Clause. Yes, it has expired, but he did get tagged with one.

If the BOT is freaking about Butch's non-involvement in the UNC scandal 5+ years ago, i just can't see any way they'd hire a guy who actually got tagged by the NCAA very recently.
 
Advertisement
Chip Kelly has one.

Our butts still tingling from the last NCAA violation.

Don't see him coming to UM. Fun to talk about, fun to ponder on.

But when the rubber meets the road, he'll be disqualified here at UM.

Chip does not have a Show cause

Also the NCAA found that Chip Kelly was not aware or involved in the illegal recruitment of Lyles. The NCAA stated that he should have been monitoring his coaches better. So Oregon got hit with failure to monitor.

Of course he has a show clause. Just google is. Have you been living under a rock?

He has no Show Clause. That expired long ago

Ok, but that's not the point. The point is that he has one on his record and that will ultimately/quickly take him out of any consideration.
 
Before it expired he couldn't hold a coaching job. Now he can but still it doesn't mean he wasn't tagged and his history will always show that. Whether the AD and the BOT will ignore that or not is a different story. They may choose his coaching skills over his previous violation but I will be surprised.
 
Mixed feelings.

I don't want to see us get more heat from the NCAA.

On the other hand, fu*k the NCAA.
 
Chip Kelly has one.

Our butts still tingling from the last NCAA violation.

Don't see him coming to UM. Fun to talk about, fun to ponder on.

But when the rubber meets the road, he'll be disqualified here at UM.

Chip does not have a Show cause

Also the NCAA found that Chip Kelly was not aware or involved in the illegal recruitment of Lyles. The NCAA stated that he should have been monitoring his coaches better. So Oregon got hit with failure to monitor.

I'm fairly certain he received one. Although, it may have expired somewhere around early 2015, allowing schools to bypass explaining themselves to the NCAA shmucks.
According to his wiki page he received an 18 month show cause.
 
The arguments about NCAA issues in the Chip threads are baffling. They are all premised on Butch not being considered or negatively considered by the BoT because of NCAA issues at UNC. While that is thrown around these boards a ton, I've never seen anything solid to substantiate its truth. Before the resent discussions, it was more generally accepted that Butch was not wanted back because some folks were still angry with how he left. While neither of these issues help Butch, the smoke suggests that they don't disqualify him at all. He's being looked at as a plan B or C. It seems that some folks believe Chip is a better potential hire than Butch and so Butch would be losing out on the merits rather than some disqualifying technicality. Butch is relatively high on my list, but let's keep in mind that he has never been a great game day coach, has been unemployed for a few years, and that numerous schools that are not smarting from his departure or recent NCAA scandals have hired coaches without so much as glancing in his direction. To suggest we won't hire Chip because of some NCAA issue is pretty outlandish.
 
Advertisement
Chip Kelly has one.

Our butts still tingling from the last NCAA violation.

Don't see him coming to UM. Fun to talk about, fun to ponder on.

But when the rubber meets the road, he'll be disqualified here at UM.

Chip does not have a Show cause

Also the NCAA found that Chip Kelly was not aware or involved in the illegal recruitment of Lyles. The NCAA stated that he should have been monitoring his coaches better. So Oregon got hit with failure to monitor.

Yes he did!

****!

A show-cause is for a specific period of time. Then it "expires."

The fact that he got one to start with is the problem. Indication of playing fast and loose with NCAA rules.

UM will not hire a coach with a show-cause.

Butch didn't even do anything, much less get a show cause, yet he's had to fight just being in the vicinity of a violation.

I know it's fun to speculate, ponder, dream, and just ignore reality - but at some point reality is coming to dinner - and you gotta face it.

If I'm a felon, maybe I did my time, but when I'm looked at - it's right on my record. Felon.
 
The arguments about NCAA issues in the Chip threads are baffling. They are all premised on Butch not being considered or negatively considered by the BoT because of NCAA issues at UNC. While that is thrown around these boards a ton, I've never seen anything solid to substantiate its truth. Before the resent discussions, it was more generally accepted that Butch was not wanted back because some folks were still angry with how he left. While neither of these issues help Butch, the smoke suggests that they don't disqualify him at all. He's being looked at as a plan B or C. It seems that some folks believe Chip is a better potential hire than Butch and so Butch would be losing out on the merits rather than some disqualifying technicality. Butch is relatively high on my list, but let's keep in mind that he has never been a great game day coach, has been unemployed for a few years, and that numerous schools that are not smarting from his departure or recent NCAA scandals have hired coaches without so much as glancing in his direction. To suggest we won't hire Chip because of some NCAA issue is pretty outlandish.


Watch.
 
The arguments about NCAA issues in the Chip threads are baffling. They are all premised on Butch not being considered or negatively considered by the BoT because of NCAA issues at UNC. While that is thrown around these boards a ton, I've never seen anything solid to substantiate its truth. Before the resent discussions, it was more generally accepted that Butch was not wanted back because some folks were still angry with how he left. While neither of these issues help Butch, the smoke suggests that they don't disqualify him at all. He's being looked at as a plan B or C. It seems that some folks believe Chip is a better potential hire than Butch and so Butch would be losing out on the merits rather than some disqualifying technicality. Butch is relatively high on my list, but let's keep in mind that he has never been a great game day coach, has been unemployed for a few years, and that numerous schools that are not smarting from his departure or recent NCAA scandals have hired coaches without so much as glancing in his direction. To suggest we won't hire Chip because of some NCAA issue is pretty outlandish.

Well, the same argument can be used with Chip. He obviously doesn't know a defense when he sees one, and just can't put one together - which is why his offense will fail against a great defense.

Urban loses games. Saban loses games he shouldn't. Everyone does, but losses only apply to Butch Davis.

Whatever. Chip's not coming to UM. Argue it all you want. He's got that NCAA leprosy - and UM is just out of an NCAA fight.
 
Back
Top