For fun discussion and speculation: I would say 4 years of elite offense combined with 1 very good defense, 1 above average defense and 2 mediocre defenses. I guess my question is: Is this a coach who only cares for one side of the ball and neglects the other? or Is it a coach who can scheme lesser athletes to success on offense but suffers from a weak recruiting base on the side of the ball that requires more physical talent?
2009
Offense 36.1 ppg-8th in nation
412 ypg- 33rd in nation
Defense 23.8 ppg-50th in nation
336.3 ypg-35th in nation
2010
Offense 47 ppg- 1st in nation
530.7 ypg- 1st in nation
Defense 18.7 ppg -12th in nation
346 ypg- 34th in nation
2011
Offense 46.1 ppg- 3rd in nation
522.8 ypg-4th in nation
Defense 24.6 ppg-52nd in nation
390.1 ypg-67th in nation
2012
Offense 49.5 ppg- 2nd in nation
537.4 ypg-5th in nation
Defense 21.6 ppg-25th in nation
374.2 ypg-44th in nation
2009
Offense 36.1 ppg-8th in nation
412 ypg- 33rd in nation
Defense 23.8 ppg-50th in nation
336.3 ypg-35th in nation
2010
Offense 47 ppg- 1st in nation
530.7 ypg- 1st in nation
Defense 18.7 ppg -12th in nation
346 ypg- 34th in nation
2011
Offense 46.1 ppg- 3rd in nation
522.8 ypg-4th in nation
Defense 24.6 ppg-52nd in nation
390.1 ypg-67th in nation
2012
Offense 49.5 ppg- 2nd in nation
537.4 ypg-5th in nation
Defense 21.6 ppg-25th in nation
374.2 ypg-44th in nation