For all the mopery, and some admittedly bizarre defensive calls on occasion, last year's defense can't be described as bad. It was bad in spots, and they gave up at the end. But it was ok, all in all.
Any improvement this year makes this team a tough out, with a more seasoned Kaaya.
Nebraska just got another first down.
VTech just got caught behind the line again. What's your point? Obviously Nebraska was a poor effort, but the defense finished 14th in yards per game and 45th in points. Every team has cupcakes on their schedule. This is mediocre. Bad is what we were the year before - in the bottom 25%.
This right here is EXACTLY why I constantly remind everyone that the common thread between the cast of characters on this board who either actively or passively defend the coaching staff and/or administration all have one thing in common....they are morons.
Re-read what you just posted. You're comparing a COMPETENT offense in Nebraska to a below average offense in VT and then using it as some type of *** backwards defense that the "defense" in some way showed improvement last year.
Against anyone with a heartbeat...we folded. Nothing has changed...if it has to be explained to you any further then you're just as bad as the brock's and Hurricane Warrior's of this board.
Holy ****ing ****.
Gonna try to dumb this down for you, but it's going to take some effort.
Good defenses make all offenses look bad.
Bad defenses make all offenses look good.
Mediocre defenses make good offenses look good, and bad offenses look bad.
It really shouldn't be this difficult to grasp.
