Can't wait til this waiver **** gets dropped and they start letting free labor play wherever the fvck they want whenever the fvck they want. Tate didn't like his situation in OSU, why penalize a child, I'll never understand it.
$$$$
Can't wait til this waiver **** gets dropped and they start letting free labor play wherever the fvck they want whenever the fvck they want. Tate didn't like his situation in OSU, why penalize a child, I'll never understand it.
Why focus on quarterbacks? That's the only position where a free market philosophy would be an issue for the reasons you and another poster mentioned. Pretend you're a borderline DT NFL prospect but your school just hired a 3-4 DC, all of sudden your playing time is cut in half, no reason why that kid shouldn't be allowed to leave.
The kid picked the school. The kid knows coaches can leave. The kid also has the ability to graduate and have immediate eligibility.
Why are people shaming the NCAA for making kids focus on earning a degree?
The system works exactly the way it should. Earn your degree, transfer wherever you want. Nobody is stopping that.
And players can always go FCS and play immediately. Players can also declare for the draft. There are multiple options that don’t require immediate eligibility for every transfer that’s mad he didn’t get the starting spot.
Why focus on quarterbacks? That's the only position where a free market philosophy would be an issue for the reasons you and another poster mentioned. Pretend you're a borderline DT NFL prospect but your school just hired a 3-4 DC, all of sudden your playing time is cut in half to no fault of your own, no reason why that kid shouldn't be allowed to leave.
Does anybody know the expected timeframe for the NCAA approving/denying Martell’s waiver request?
Agreed. I am not in favor of total Free Agency every offseason but I think the NCAA needs to be a little more lenient and come up with simple guidelines to follow to allow immediate eligibility.
A HC change or a coordinator change should allow the player to freely leave as well as any “hardship” that creates a negative environment for the player as a result of the leadership at the school.
I don’t think a player should become immediately eligible at another school because they are homesick or made the wrong decision.
We wouldn’t have fielded a team last year.Can't wait til this waiver **** gets dropped and they start letting free labor play wherever the fvck they want whenever the fvck they want. Tate didn't like his situation in OSU, why penalize a child, I'll never understand it.
Credits aren't a problem, don't come at me with earning a degree before transferring.
It's coming.Can't wait til this waiver **** gets dropped and they start letting free labor play wherever the fvck they want whenever the fvck they want. Tate didn't like his situation in OSU, why penalize a child, I'll never understand it.
If you didn’t have appropriate credits towards graduation, you couldn’t transfer at all. That’s a given.
But earning the degree to have immediate eligibility seems fair to me.
We can agree to disagree. No harm no foul.
Grad transfer rule works, that's not my point. But if a 19 year old freshman wants to transfer it isn't school credits that is holding them back, it is only that they need to sit a year. That's a fact.
The sitting out a season is designed to make the kid really consider if the transfer is worth it. And they know the rules ahead of time.
Where does the line stop at transfers? Can they transfer every season and being eligible at the new school? Can they transfer back to the school they left and be eligible?
There are all kinds of unintended consequences that come with granting every student athlete immediate eligibility when they are on a full ride.
That argument won't fly. Martell kind of hurt himself. He was posting on social media to Justin Fields that he was going to be the starting QB at Ohio State and Fields should look elsewhere. That was after Urban Meyer's retirement announcement. Also, the new head coach has been his offensive coordinator for two years so the "I transferred because of the new coach" excuse is rather weak. It's obvious he transferred because of Fields. The question the NCAA would/should ask is, "If Fields didn't transfer to Ohio State, would Martell still be there?" Obviously, yes. Like I said previously, his social media posts will not help his cause. I would be shocked if the waiver is granted to Martell or to Fields for that matter.I would think Martell can get one. He can point out that the coach who recruited him quit after a major domestic violence scandal and “health problems” he can say the program the new coach brought in his own offensive system and transfer QB. If I was him I would just keenhitting in the environment around a program who covered up domestic violence.
I agree with you. These kids are making a lot of people a lot of money. That being said, unrestricted free agency would definitely be transformative... and I don’t know if that would be good for the sport.There can be rules. But the players are free labor, therefore they should be free to do whatever they want whenever they want.
And, no, I am not going to get into the ethical discussion of "is tuition a form of payment?" You won't be able to nudge me on that topic.
Only problem with that argument is he stayed the whole year following the scandal... If he was affected that much he would have left when when it all went down.... It's more than obvious the only reason he left is because Fields transferred in... Look his lawyers are gonna argue this that and everything else but I don't see him being cleared.... The one thing he had going for him was graduating early but that doesn't look realistic either...I would think Martell can get one. He can point out that the coach who recruited him quit after a major domestic violence scandal and “health problems” he can say the program the new coach brought in his own offensive system and transfer QB. If I was him I would just keenhitting in the environment around a program who covered up domestic violence.
Guess you don’t have kids and have that looming thought of how you are going to pay for college?There can be rules. But the players are free labor, therefore they should be free to do whatever they want whenever they want.
And, no, I am not going to get into the ethical discussion of "is tuition a form of payment?" You won't be able to nudge me on that topic.
Guess you don’t have kids and have that looming thought of how you are going to pay for college?
I was a baseball player on 1/2 scholarship
Trust me it’s a big deal and it IS a form of payment
So it's a business from one side but not for the other? There's one goal for big time college football players and that's to get to the NFL. If you're not happy with your trajectory, you should have a chance to change it. But no, you're right, let's continue to profit off kids and holding them down to some mythical contract with a certain institution.
There can certainly be better ways to go about the process. Imagine being a 19 year old kid being frustrated but you can't do anything about it. Your only course of action is taking a severe hit to your long term prospects by sitting a year out.
Excellent point RVA. You know **** well the NCAA doesn't want to do anything to tarnish their squeaky clean image. I'd say the dirtier the laundry, the more likely they are to keep as much of it from being aired out as possible.I think if they don't, they could be risking a precedent in court allowing transfers in addition to all of the dirty laundry that gets aired.
Does anybody know the expected timeframe for the NCAA approving/denying Martell’s waiver request?