Mario cast a pretty wide net for OC

Apparently stats like average depth of target and QB rating aren't stats in your world...because you don't like what they show. I love it when people only recognize stats that they think support their position.
Problem with that would be I showed you EACH and every stat he had in all seasons that's good and bad. So while you and those people choose to ignore where he was in season 1 because he made progress in season 2(with experience you'd hope so) and then you go into stats that equate nothing but averages over the entirety of the season yet you choose to ignore the fact that also in these instances meant **** near two hundred more attempts that would DRASTICALLY alter those stats YOU QUOTED with your logic(because it doesn't match your narrative)you ignore that fact. You're fighting a losing battle in this with me. But feel free to keep on. I'll stick with what I know. Part of which is Justin Herbert himself that laughs at the nonsense people like you have to say. Just like anyone that knows football would as well.
 
Advertisement
on the removal of certain posters, i think it is foolish. unless a poster is violating TOS or instructions from a maude, keep em. that´s part of an online community. don´t like him or her, choose the ignore button.

but banning someone who schitck is stupid or you don´t like what they say is IMHO foolish. its unwarranted censorship. i have a few people on ignore and it makes my experience on here tolerable.
 
on the removal of certain posters, i think it is foolish. unless a poster is violating TOS or instructions from a maude, keep em. that´s part of an online community. don´t like him or her, choose the ignore button.

but banning someone who schitck is stupid or you don´t like what they say is IMHO foolish. its unwarranted censorship. i have a few people on ignore and it makes my experience on here tolerable.
What if I were to tell you that person sits atop both the most ignored and most reported user lists?
 
You do know who you’re arguing with, don’t you? That guys forgotten more about football then the vast majority of us will ever know.
look there are people in here evaluating contracts they haven't seen without a bar license or even exp in contracts/legal. there are people in here evaluating medicals from players they've never met or records they've never seen without an MD. everyone has an opinion. idgaf who is who. idc who they are behind the username. its a forum. no one should worship anyone on here.
 
on the removal of certain posters, i think it is foolish. unless a poster is violating TOS or instructions from a maude, keep em. that´s part of an online community. don´t like him or her, choose the ignore button.

but banning someone who schitck is stupid or you don´t like what they say is IMHO foolish. its unwarranted censorship. i have a few people on ignore and it makes my experience on here tolerable.
Let them have their committee, 2 of the posters mentioned just came back from being banned
 
I get ur shot. Since ur putting me into that equation you should pick up on the ability to either read or apply context. As everyone I communicate with would tell you I was here all along #1. #2 what I said and what I did was stop posting or replying to people. Previously I always replied to anyone that either quoted me or tagged me in a thread. Also to further stick to the issue as I pointed out it wasn't because of what was happening on the field I stopped posting. It was because of the fanbase(on here) who immediately started with what a horrible hire,fire this person,we won't get this recruit... That's what I was and still am done with. Here on out I won't ever again indulge in those conversations with anyone UNLESS it's warranted. Several games into a season with a complete staff turnover, new schemes and with all the injuries we had... At no point should THOSE conversations have been happening. There was certainly issues. But let's use gattis as an example he could've adapted A LOT more but his play calling and his ON FIELD issues that he could control weren't fireable offenses in my eyes. I would've brought on a co oc by the end of the season due to some concerns. But for the people who know what was really going on I'll leave it at WHAT GOT HIM FIRED AND HIS BIGGEST ISSUES BY FAR, WE'RE ALL OFF FIELD ISSUES. & THEY WERE GLARING ISSUES... If anyone that knows what I'm speaking on would care to elaborate feel free but he's no longer here so I'm gonna leave that alone. But if you feel that describes me than feel free. Me, this university and these teams are my family. All of them. Good and the bad. From Jimmy to alfraud to Mandy. Good or the bad these are my people and I bleed with them. I feel all of them and the struggles. Do I take it personally, yup sure the **** I do. But for strangers on a website that don't know 99% of what they speak on. Nah I'm good on that.
no one really was serious about fire Mario unless youre insane. however, I was vocal along w a few others about how bad gattis was really early on. it was obvious to see w anyone w eyes. people followed like sheep until it got worse and worse. its okay to say Mario failed in year 1 as a coach and staff builder. he excelled as a recruiter. he also took steps. to correct it with staff turnover. now lets see how it plays out in year 2. also, I hard disagree w you on not fireable for gattis esp given his issues at Michigan as a play caller. alos, its already been said that he was having *** w students apparently. and as the school si family for you bc you went and played there, I along w many people on here went to UM as well. the school is our home as well and we all contribute back as appreciation for what the school represents to us.
 
What if I were to tell you that person sits atop both the most ignored and most reported user lists?

again, this is just an opinion, but ******** are ubiquitous and we have plenty of them here that add zero or little value. i could care less about the subject poster, i don´t read anything he says. reacting to him or quoting him is what he wants. you have the choice to simply not read him and not respond or better yet ignore him.
 
Advertisement
again, this is just an opinion, but ******** are ubiquitous and we have plenty of them here that add zero or little value. i could care less about the subject poster, i don´t read anything he says. reacting to him or quoting him is what he wants. you have the choice to simply not read him and not respond or better yet ignore him.
As a rule, I agree. But there's only one in the top 4 of both lists.
1677623987402.png
1677624002787.png
 
look there are people in here evaluating contracts they haven't seen without a bar license or even exp in contracts/legal. there are people in here evaluating medicals from players they've never met or records they've never seen without an MD. everyone has an opinion. idgaf who is who. idc who they are behind the username. its a forum. no one should worship anyone on here.
I don’t worship anyone on here. Especially the keyboard warriors that don’t know their *** from a hole in the ground. Those that have certain knowledge and experience about certain topics can provide much better opinions than those that only have opinions with without knowledge and/or experience.

I have enough intellect to be able to distinguish between those that know what they’re talking about and those that have no clue.
 
Advertisement
I don’t worship anyone on here. Especially the keyboard warriors that don’t know their *** from a hole in the ground. Those that have certain knowledge and experience about certain topics can provide much better opinions than those that only have opinions with without knowledge and/or experience.

I have enough intellect to be able to distinguish between those that know what they’re talking about and those that have no clue.
I mean tbh, we dont know who anyone is. I could create an account tomorrow and say im ed reed. I haven't met anyone on here in real life, so for me, everyone is a personality online. realistically, youre just taking someones word of rosmething you were told is x and y. unless you met them, you can't personally verify it. that doesn't mean they dont know what theyre talking about but it also isnt fair to just tell people listen to x bc he may or may not know more.
 
Me. I was released in September.
I have recommended 5 members who have demonstrated the long-standing desire and fortitude to clean things up on here including a former player of fine repute. That you have been to the bottom and come back is testament to your worthiness to judge reprehensible slapdicks and assorted shrimp****s.
 
I don’t worship anyone on here. Especially the keyboard warriors that don’t know their *** from a hole in the ground. Those that have certain knowledge and experience about certain topics can provide much better opinions than those that only have opinions with without knowledge and/or experience.

I have enough intellect to be able to distinguish between those that know what they’re talking about and those that have no clue.
Hermano words have value. Intellect goes a long way. Reasons I've ever said anything about what he says is because you can tell he has a lil bit of football knowledge atleast. Yet when he doesn't agree with someone or someone sensationalism becomes a trigger point. I'm trying to get better about not getting offended by words. It's part of my journey. But lord does it get annoying when people take shots for whatever reason constantly. As you said theres a drastic difference paying attention to something someone has to say opposed to worshipping everything someone does. It's like max kellerman with boxing. I think from a boxing perspective he generally knows his ****. But when he steps out of that comfort zone he doesn't know his *** from a hole in the wall.
 
Back
Top