- Joined
- Nov 18, 2011
- Messages
- 2,186
The DT's are looking just as beastly and playing smart with intensity.I totally agree. D Lewis deserves a ton of credit as well
The DT's are looking just as beastly and playing smart with intensity.I totally agree. D Lewis deserves a ton of credit as well
gables or pinecrest?I don’t think he’s leaving. The reason I say it is he’s a legend down here and he bought a house in the Gables after selling that house he had forever in plantation. I think he wants to stay here and if Heatherman is here another year I don’t know that he doesn’t get the DC job.
That's just Mario trusting his people around him and making sure they are all on the same page. I didn't see anything wrong with it. Especially since we have had coaches like Golden and D'onofrio who thought they were the smartest person in the room wherever they were.Slow down with Mario, old man. Yesterday, when it was 4th down (after a Bain sack), and a penalty was on A&M for illegal hands to the face, our HC didn't know what to do. He had to ask for help from Hetherman who clearly told him to decline the penalty to keep it at 4th and 9, and force A&M to punt. Mario, almost......almost.....accepted that penalty.
I mean 3rd and 20 wouldn't have been the end of the world, either. Good chance we get a sack or INT in that situation.Slow down with Mario, old man. Yesterday, when it was 4th down (after a Bain sack), and a penalty was on A&M for illegal hands to the face, our HC didn't know what to do. He had to ask for help from Hetherman who clearly told him to decline the penalty to keep it at 4th and 9, and force A&M to punt. Mario, almost......almost.....accepted that penalty.
Brother, I hear you, but our HC needs to know that declining a penalty is the correct decision.That's just Mario trusting his people around him and making sure they are all on the same page. I didn't see anything wrong with it. Especially since we have had coaches like Golden and D'onofrio who thought they were the smartest person in the room wherever they were.
Um, no brother. The game is tied at 3. A&M is punting the ball on 4th and 9 with an entire quarter left to play. And no, you don’t accept the penalty and move them back to give them another chance to convert.I mean 3rd and 20 wouldn't have been the end of the world, either. Good chance we get a sack or INT in that situation.. The only question was if they would punt on 4th and 9, or go for it. So yeah, a little thought had to go into that one.
A&M already went for it on 4th down on their own 46. That 3rd down was 3&6 on our 38 which imo was 4 down territory as long as Reed doesn’t take the sack. Which he did and changed the math for TAMU. But it’s probably worth discussing the exact down and distance and the likelihood TAMU goes for it.Um, no brother. The game is tied at 3. A&M is punting the ball on 4th and 9 with an entire quarter left to play. And no, you don’t accept the penalty and move them back to give them another chance to convert.
Yes but the game wasn’t in the balanceA&M already went for it on 4th down on their own 46. That 3rd down was 3&6 on our 38 which imo was 4 down territory as long as Reed doesn’t take the sack. Which he did and changed the math for TAMU. But it’s probably worth discussing the exact down and distance and the likelihood TAMU goes for it.