LT position

Advertisement
He's a freshman sure, but he's put in work to get his body college ready and had to go against Garvin, Rousseau, Patchan, Hill, etc. I'll take my chances.
 
I don’t get these threads.

Zion has been the **** front runner for the LTposition soon after he got here. They’ve loved him early on, he’s gotten bigger - I feel as good about him as any of our OL.

Exactly. It sucks to rely on a freshman, but he's clearly our best option, for better or worse, in the staffs eyes. There's no point in discussing it until we see him in action. He took the position from the start and hasn't let go. He's clearly starting and the only shuffling we could see is RG and RT - who gets the nod at RT or if we kick Scaife out and who gets the nod at RG.

We'll also be using TEs heavily IMO both in the passing game and helping out the tackles as necessary.
 
If Zion starts game 1 I do not feel very confident. Hopefully the move to elevate Campbell to 1st team RT is to get Herbert reps at LT.

source.gif
 
Advertisement
Who bumps their own comment? Genius commentary bro I didn't here every single person who watched a single practice say the same thing.
Haha yeah seriously. Especially something as generic and already widely accepted as the o-line not being great.
 
If you bump your own thread predicting doom just to take a victory lap, you just might be a douchebag.

If you point out your own earlier post in said thread agreeing with the aforementioned douchebag, you're a slightly smaller douchebag.
 
Who bumps their own comment? Genius commentary bro I didn't here every single person who watched a single practice say the same thing.
Here or hear? I made a simple thread saying I hope we have a back up plan or something they were hiding when they closed practices cause if we started Zion we were in deep ****. I got ripped. So for the careless a$$holes who took the need to be keyboard tough guys suck my sack.
 
Advertisement
Back
Top