That's not what anyone with a brain is saying. As always, people are unable to see gray areas, or understand nuance.
I am saying if we don't sign the kid, it's a failure. FOR THIS INDIVIDUAL KID. Because of the circumstance. He's a legacy, he's local, he's an elite prospect, he plays at a major position of need and one of the most important positions on the field, and he's the exact type of kid we've missed on for 10+ years and that we brought Mario here to sign.
That's it. That's all anyone with a brain is saying. If you can't close on this kid, someone we are absolutely prioritizing, and going aggressively after, then it's a failure. IT. Not the whole class, not the trajectory of the program for the next 5 years. JUST THIS KID would be a failure if you allow him to go elsewhere. I don't give a **** about "we tried". Try harder. Win. Hold him hostage. I don't care....you either win or lose in this game. If this kid doesn't sign here, you lost.
Would the loss be softened by signing the #1 class in the country? Obviously. But if Calvin Russell signs with another school, it's a recruiting L because he's one of your highest priority recruits, and he went somewhere else. This really isn't even a genuine discussion.