- Joined
- Oct 15, 2018
- Messages
- 551
1) Instead of even money on both sides, let’s agree that Vegas wants profit... that’s more important to them than which team wins.Check out the explanation in the below thread. It’s much more profitable for casinos in the long run to not call off action or get equal amounts wagered on both sides:
Post in thread 'UL is a 2.5 point favorite (Updated 9/14)'
https://www.canesinsight.com/threads/ul-is-a-2-5-point-favorite-updated-9-14.163208/post-4847996
2) I concede that maximum guaranteed profit is not always at equal money. Let’s say changing a line away from even money reduced the profit per bet by 50% but makes the gamble more enticing and increased the number of bets by more than 50%, then Vegas makes more money for the game while having an unequal distribution of money. So, there is a benefit to having a line that is enticing. However, if you make the line too enticing, the excess volume will yield ever increasing losses.
3) In conclusion, Vegas odds are reflective of the general consensus of sports gamblers, Vegas’s initial calculation of even money, and further modifications using multivariate forces of capitalism to fleece gamblers of the most amount of money. They are not pure odds based solely upon calculations of probability of a particular outcome in the game.
4) so, for the important part of this conversation, we are in agreement. Vagas odds and the line are more of a reflection of Vegas making maximum profit than they are of The probability of any particular outcome in the game.