- Joined
- Dec 19, 2014
- Messages
- 35,532
Mopes are just more vocal. 11.8 % seems about right.judging by the overall temperature of this board I was expecting mostly "D or lower"
Mopes are just more vocal. 11.8 % seems about right.judging by the overall temperature of this board I was expecting mostly "D or lower"
im pleasantly surprisedMopes are just more vocal. 11.8 % seems about right.
It just seems like there are more of them because they're so vocal. It's down to 11.4%, so that's encouraging.im pleasantly surprised
Go CANES thanks for the advice and I do appreciate it. Fortunately, I had season tickets for about 30 years but not the last 3 years because the football program is a total clown show.
Since when did 8-3 at UM look shiny?C+
UM's 8-3 record isn't as shiny as it looks.
Signed,
Peruche
C. That is the worst canes defense of the modern era.
****, I gave the highest grade with a B+?! I'm not exactly known as a slurper.
We took a step forward, both W/L wise, and just eye test wise (Lashlee/King). That, IMO, gets us to at least a B.
For reference, I would say staying the same is a C. Slightly regressing is a D. Completely collapsing (3-4 wins) is an F.
Curious to see what the reaction would be if we took the bowl game out of the mix, or called it a Canes win. I kind of discount that game because King got hurt (even if Perry played well in his absence).