Who would you rather have?
Miller would of done better then him. imo
In COLLEGE..hands down Richardson...not even close...in COLLEGE Rich was the best back I've seen since AP...and I am not the only one who will or has said that...Miller real good...just not as dominant....BUTTTT with Bamas line...and I am guessing that is your real question as Henry, Ingram, yeldon, Rich all have been 5* production but NFL production not quite what was expected
Miller. Easily.
Trent has proven he has no wiggle or vision. At Bama he was getting full heads of steam and sometimes not seeing first contact until 5-8 yards into the second level. If Miller was on that Bama team, his explosion combined with the massive chunks of daylight he would've been given -- it would've been a **** of a show.
In COLLEGE..hands down Richardson...not even close...in COLLEGE Rich was the best back I've seen since AP...and I am not the only one who will or has said that...Miller real good...just not as dominant....BUTTTT with Bamas line...and I am guessing that is your real question as Henry, Ingram, yeldon, Rich all have been 5* production but NFL production not quite what was expected
I always wonder what could have been had Lamar Miller stayed one more year and it would have been him and a freshman Duke Johnson in the backfield.
Hey I love Miller...lets take the glasses off...in COLLEGE trich was a man child...punished...had this rare explosion...maybe it was the juice, loss of passion,or something but it definitely left once hit the NFL....never once have I heard an AP and Miller comp...