forums

Kirby Smart on Why BIG10 is Dominating

I don’t really disagree with him. It’s why I’ve supported playing softer OOC schedules. Blow em out, rest our dudes n get the young guys reps
 
RozayCane said:
Lol

Click to expand...



1777641055079.png
 
IMG_8213.jpeg
IMG_8212.png
IMG_8216.jpeg
IMG_8215.jpeg
IMG_8214.png
IMG_8217.png
IMG_8218.jpeg


Seven regular season games, in totality, that illustrate he doesn’t know wtf he is talking about. Additionally, IU spanked Alabama yet played it close against PSU. IU beat Old Dominion by 13 points and Iowa by five points. Iowa beat Vanderbilt in their bowl game; but still lost by a field goal to Iowa State. The UGA vs GT games the last two years have been within one score.

NFL drafted more players from the SEC than the XII, ACC, and ND combined. I promise you, the SEC isn’t getting that good of players lmao; people act like the personnel of 30 front offices cannot have the same biases as the media ecosystem.

They were never as good as they thought they were during the 10s; and NFL draft picks give them a false impression that they are facing harder trials and tribulations than everybody else.

All that said, at least he admitted that the top of their conference, the B1G, is better than the SEC. That’s undeniable. USC was better than Vanderbilt last year.
 
Last edited:
NCCanefan said:
Shocking I say. When a few schools illegally paid players they stacked talent and performed better than the rest.

And Ole Nick and Kirby wish they could return to that.
Click to expand...
And no one has mentioned that they were allowed to do so because Mark Emmert, Saban's former boss at LSU, was the President of the NCAA at the time....
 
“We had so many good players we couldn’t ***** it up.”

Thank you for finally admitting that the entire era since the internet made recruiting nationwide easier, was dominated by one conference bc you illegally paid a roster full of studs and had little to do with coaching.
 
He could have just said, well last season the SEC had 11 teams with the 50%+ blue chip ratio, the B1G had 4 and the ACC had 3, so their certainly isn't a talent comparison with anyone else. Their is the SEC and no else to converse with. Now what we are doing with that talent can be questioned? Instead, he isn't the sharpest quick thinker and gives the old go to, we beat each other up. Which is true, but low hanging cover.He could also have said, OSU. UM, IU or Oregon's schedule is maybe 1 game tougher than Miami's or ND's. Again, he isn't sharp like that. A cheater can't bring up cheating, but he knows 2 of the 3 last B1G championships were cheated for on the field. Him or Satan didn't even go that far. UM is the dirtiest athletic department in college history the last decade and I once respected them. Bags are a joke compared to this cartel.

I hate the SEC and love them not having success, but I will speak the truth.
 
TheOriginalCane said:
***** football. No thanks.
Click to expand...
That sounds badass and all. But something tells me IU fans ain’t too disappointed with their lack of regular season big wins.

I’m sure Ohio State fans loved beating Texas, but probably loved that Natty the year before when they played 3 cupcakes.

Or Michigan fans the year before that. I think it sucks. I personally preferred the 8 conference games and expectation of playing other P4 games. But that’s not where the incentives are
 
Back
Top