CANESCANES
Senior
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2024
- Messages
- 4,758
I like Coleman as a developmental guy. He can sling it, I just don’t know about going through progressions. Obviously that stuff takes maturing and film all that stuff.Neg away, and feel free to bump this in 3-4 years if I'm wrong, but I would launch Coleman into the sun for this kid.
@Dwinstitles man u gotta stop & need to be stopped! BIG PAUSE! How in the world DIK u see the 1st 2 plays of dude’s film & say he’s going to be better den Coleman? Jus say das ur opinion bc u ABSOLUTELY CANT tell that off 2 playsJust saw the first two plays and this dude is going to be way better than Coleman, thats all I have to see
He's number 1 QB on my board by a mile
cause his vision you can tell already he sees everything, dont get me wrong DC has everything but thats the one thing I see on tape I dont like about DC. Arm talent everything you want DC has but a lot of players have had those things and failed. Its something about pocket generalship and seeing everything and multiple things downfield, only some QBs have that aspect of the game. Seeing things before they happen and this dude seems like he has that.@Dwinstitles man u gotta stop & need to be stopped! BIG PAUSE! How in the world DIK u see the 1st 2 plays of dude’s film & say he’s going to be better den Coleman? Jus say das ur opinion bc u ABSOLUTELY CANT tell that off 2 plays
Paging @1murhurricane
I'd agree with him. Only it comes down to what you want out of your QB position. If simply moving the ball is the priority regardless of how you do it, than more than likely you say Coleman is better option. Cause he'll get out QUICK & take off. But that's also why I'll say this other kid will be better. Just like what Cam just showed us, certain mobile QBs can get out when needed but it's for the purpose of moving the pocket with the priority still being isolate and target an option down field. My only issue with Coleman is he's reliant on being a RUNNING QB. I don't want my Qb leaving the pocket with the clear intent of making a play with his legs. I want my Qb putting the ball into the hands of the play makers around him. Your greatest trait as an athlete is availability. If you're injured or gassed you ain't that. This kids looking to make plays with his arm. That's why I think he's the better option as a QB.@Dwinstitles man u gotta stop & need to be stopped! BIG PAUSE! How in the world DIK u see the 1st 2 plays of dude’s film & say he’s going to be better den Coleman? Jus say das ur opinion bc u ABSOLUTELY CANT tell that off 2 plays
#2 Most likely to flip
I understand but he said he saw 2 plays & made his decisionI'd agree with him. Only it comes down to what you want out of your QB position. If simply moving the ball is the priority regardless of how you do it, than more than likely you say Coleman is better option. Cause he'll get out QUICK & take off. But that's also why I'll say this other kid will be better. Just like what Cam just showed us, certain mobile QBs can get out when needed but it's for the purpose of moving the pocket with the priority still being isolate and target an option down field. My only issue with Coleman is he's reliant on being a RUNNING QB. I don't want my Qb leaving the pocket with the clear intent of making a play with his legs. I want my Qb putting the ball into the hands of the play makers around him. Your greatest trait as an athlete is availability. If you're injured or gassed you ain't that. This kids looking to make plays with his arm. That's why I think he's the better option as a QB.