- Joined
- Aug 15, 2014
- Messages
- 15,212
Did they say that?!?!?!What garbage. “Miami’s 2 loses worse than ND’s 2 loses”, so much for winning games. “ND and Miami are not in the same tier so the head to head doesn’t matter”.
Did they say that?!?!?!What garbage. “Miami’s 2 loses worse than ND’s 2 loses”, so much for winning games. “ND and Miami are not in the same tier so the head to head doesn’t matter”.
No.Did they say that?!?!?!
No clue. ESPN did say they felt ND is mostly at their ceiling though since they play 2 bad teams the end of the season (Syracuse and Stanford). They can probably only move up if other teams ahead of them lose at this point.How do you jump a tier when teams like Utah get stuffed between us and ND to prevent the head to head being considered?
Yes; said miami and ND aren’t even compared in the room together because they do comparisons by groups of 3 lmfaoDid they say that?!?!?!
corruption
no other way to spin it
My issue is that they use whatever facts fit their narrative. Alabama has had maybe 3 of the 4 worst losses among CFP contenders the last two years.Nothing. Just that who u lose to matters.
He pretty much did
They call these tiers "comparison pools". The committee is asked to compare a cluster of teams and provide relative rankings. It's actually a reasonable enough algorithm in general. One problem introduced by competitive sports is that H2H is the most important tiebreaker, but it only works when the comparison pool has a size of two. So the committee is working with this analytics-informed comparison tool that is highly sensitive to the choice of pool size. The rumor going around is that the pool size is four, which (conveniently for ND, for the moment) prevents direct comparison of ND and UM. If UM wins out, they will be in a pool with ND, and thus be highly likely to be ranked above the Irish on Selection Sunday.Wtf is a “tier”? Seriously? Is this some made up term by the committee? Is this an actual thing as it applies to seedings? Pardon my ignorance.
Only when it suits their narrative i.e. Texas’s win over OU who beat UMich; USC’s H2H win over UMich; UGA over Ole Miss; etc.That logic is severely flawed because one of ND's losses is to Miami. It works if ND didn't lose to Miami.
Comparing losses is one input. How about comparing wins?
We've lost to ourselves at least once this season so one of our losses is just as good as NDsWhat garbage. “Miami’s 2 loses worse than ND’s 2 loses”, so much for winning games. “ND and Miami are not in the same tier so the head to head doesn’t matter”.
Sounds like 13-16 is a different tier. Once Miamis gets to 12 then the have to compare Miami and Nd with h2h. Rn our loses are holding us out that tier is what I’ve read. Idk what happens once we can get compared to them but it should be Miao over them since H2H can then be used. Also if we dominate last 2 away games I think tha will help since Miami didn’t look great on the road so farWhat garbage. “Miami’s 2 loses worse than ND’s 2 loses”, so much for winning games. “ND and Miami are not in the same tier so the head to head doesn’t matter”.