forums

just released 2016 ESPN 300

Weird to see Snelson over Bruce and Mullins.

These are very early rankings though.

Also some guys are too low or too high or should be on this list.
 
Advertisement
I like Snelson as a prospect I think he is the type of athlete that can play multiple positions at the next level but 11 is way too high and I expect that number to drop come feb 2016.

Snelson hasn't even gotten to show his full potential yet because of mckenzie and Dallas Perez getting more looks than him
 
Peter Ariz said:
Snelson's ceiling is higer than Bruce and Mullins
Click to expand...

that I agree with but I think it's too early to tout him 11 when he didn't even have 15 receptions last year according to maxpreps. But, with that said these rankings are projections and I do expect Snelson to show out against Sta & miramar early in the season.
 
My only problem with Snelson and his teammate Brandon Johnson. They don't have the production or receptions yet like some of the other '16 receivers.
 
just another reminder

[video=youtube;3CaRq-0_9Q0]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3CaRq-0_9Q0[/video]
 
Advertisement
No matter which order the sites will have them ranked, a 2016 WR haul of Mullins, Bruce, and Snelson would be beyond ridiculous.

Three elite in-state receivers who want to lock up their spot early and try to build something special with their class? Way too early to tell if we'll be able to hold onto them over the next year and a half, but you couldn't possibly have a better start at WR for 2016.
 
Mecole Hardman is the one I really want.... add him to the list he already has an offer. .... talking about speed that boy can scat
 
Advertisement
And how is Michael Pinckney not rated yet, his tape is amazing.

I would give him a 94 or 95 rating.
 
Back
Top