Dat first sentence, though.
“On a defensive line not long ago, for a Miami Hurricanes program not far away, there existed a once-modest concern: depth.”
I could eat a can of alphabet soup and chit a more compelling opener.
That butchery followed by this brain twister...
“Led by returning starters, the rest of the depth chart was made up of rotational players...”
Well I’ll be damned. I thought every depth chart in America was made up of starters and rotational players. In fact, I thought that was the whole point of a depth chart: to establish the starting line up and the order of rotation among the back ups.
Not two full sentences in and I’m smacked up side the head with a terrible Star Wars analogy and the ground breaking revelation that a roster is made up of starters and backups, and if you put the backups in order, well now you got yourself a depth chart.
This is Pulitzer grade stuff.