Anos would have brad kaaya running QB power
There may be a guy in New England who has won a few super bowls and he might have something to say about this."it’s not about running a system and just plugging it in and saying, ‘this is what we’re doing.’ It’s about finding out what they do well and running those plays and putting them in the position to have success."
Why is this so hard to understand for play callers at Miami? For ***** sake
Thats a hit to mario staffJust announced new HC at UNLV Oregon OC Marcus Arroyo
Why are we so bad at identifying (and hiring) young coaching talent? It completely baffles me.
"it’s not about running a system and just plugging it in and saying, ‘this is what we’re doing.’ It’s about finding out what they do well and running those plays and putting them in the position to have success."
Why is this so hard to understand for play callers at Miami? For ***** sake
Whats funny is since UO has such a high standard of offensive output and standard from their success with lighting up scoreboards earlier this decade, that they werent really fond of their OC and felt like he wasted the talent of their qb.. They are happy someone came and "stole" Arroyo..Just announced new HC at UNLV Oregon OC Marcus Arroyo
Didnt take what he said that way.. I think what he said to use your analogy is that he looks at his troops and the resources they have at disposal and says hey we dont have 100 tanks to just run over opponents, but we got these planes and we got these guys with these skills. I feel like to put them in best position to succeed we should attack in this way which works better than what we have done in last war..This flies in the face of 100 years of football. Football is the closest thing to war without being in battle. It was fashioned that way in the inception days. Football has always been: devise a strategy, prepare your troops/condition them for war, drill your troops for battle, ensure execution at the highest level, go win the war.
The thought process of listening to your troops' input, devising your battle plans based on the specific skills of the collection of individuals you have, detailing the WHY to your subordinates is not something that generals ever did and its not something that coaches have taken with alacrity en masse.
I'm not surprised we haven't had that here because there aren't many coaches that TRULY believe in this approach.
sorry...santa aint real so no goView attachment 104790Want to wake up Christmas morning with the miracle gift of a new and excellent staff.
Didnt take what he said that way.. I think what he said to use your analogy is that he looks at his troops and the resources they have at disposal and says hey we dont have 100 tanks to just run over opponents, but we got these planes and we got these guys with these skills. I feel like to put them in best position to succeed we should attack in this way which works better than what we have done in last war..
What our guys have basically said last 10 years is, this is who we are, and who we are has worked for last 25 years of battle, we will continue to do this because this is who we are.. Regardless of new ways, technology and resources, we will stick to this way because it has always worked and only reason it doesnt work is because the soldiers we have are not able to execute the orders given to them,
I wonder how many Joe Bradys exists around the NFL(maybe even CFB) tucked away as analysts on good teams, while the same idiots like Enos and Matt Canada keep getting passed around like a blunt as OCs
I lol'ed....they would be considered bobby brown...not loudI wonder how many Joe Bradys exists around the NFL(maybe even CFB) tucked away as analysts on good teams, while the same idiots like Enos and Matt Canada keep getting passed around like a blunt as OCs