forums

2026 Jackson Cantwell 5* OT from Nixa, MO

Status
Not open for further replies.
Advertisement
MumbleRap said:
Long *** marathon. Dennis been running it for 4 years.
Click to expand...

Marathon is also an island just south of Miami in the Florida Keys
Just Saying Bernie Sanders GIF by Saturday Night Live
 
The buzz feels just like JJ Smith. Except we have been burnt so many times none of us will get our hopes up lol.

Always the bridesmaid never the bride
 
JADood said:
Aww man. The know it all doesn’t like me. Guess I’ll just stop “investing statistics”?
Click to expand...


I don't care what you invest in.

Miami gave up 23 sacks in 13 games. Georgia gave up 25 sacks in 14 games. Oregon gave up 21 sacks in 14 games.

It's a useless stat to talk about "not winning the sack battle" game-by-game. You don't even take into account whether we should blame our DL more than our OL for your "stat".

We had one sack against Florida, AN SEC TEAM that went 8-5. In the 4th quarter. Up 28 with 12 minutes left. But you won't give credit for that one.

OK, we "lost the sack battle" to Virginia Tech, 3-2. Virginia Tech gave up 34 sacks in 13 games and were ranked 50 spots below Miami in sacks given up. WHO HAS THE BETTER OL?

We "lost the sack battle" to Cal 3-2. Cal gave up 50 sacks in 13 games and were ranked DEAD LAST in Division I-A in sacks allowed. WHO HAS THE BETTER OL?

We "tied the sack battle" with Louisville 3-3. Oh, but we didn't "win the sack battle". You have got to be kidding me.

We "lost the sack battle" to F$U 4-3. Florida State gave up 49 sacks in 12 games and were ranked SECOND-TO-LAST in Division I-A. WHO HAS THE BETTER OL?

We "lost the sack battle" to Duke 2-1. WHO GIVES A ****?

We "lost the sack battle" to GaTech 3-0. This is the only game that means anything, as we lost the game. Was it due to the 3 sacks we gave up? Was it due to getting ZERO sacks on GaTech? We had the ball on the final drive with a chance to win the game and Cam Ward fumbled, that's how close the game was.

The point is, you posted some worthless stat about "not winning the sack battle" in six ACC games in which we went 5-1. At the same time, we gave up less than 2 sacks per game (tied for 57th in the country) and we were #31 in rushing yards per game and #7 in the country in rushing yards per carry (notice the teams that are NOT ahead of us).

So you'll forgive me if I don't "invest" much in your garbage stat of "didn't win the sack battle in 6 out of 8 ACC games".



1747150065852.png
1747150031071.png
 
Last edited:
Am I the only one who’d rather drop an eye watering amount of money on a game changing skill player like WR or CB? Yeah it’d be awesome to land the #1 player but a WR can win you a game..an OLineman? Not as much. Not saying having a lockdown OT isn’t critical to being a championship caliber team but still..
 
Braduhley said:
Am I the only one who’d rather drop an eye watering amount of money on a game changing skill player like WR or CB? Yeah it’d be awesome to land the #1 player but a WR can win you a game..an OLineman? Not as much. Not saying having a lockdown OT isn’t critical to being a championship caliber team but still..
Click to expand...
No. This kid is not the person I’d overspend on personally. Not with the way OL is this year
 
Advertisement
Braduhley said:
Am I the only one who’d rather drop an eye watering amount of money on a game changing skill player like WR or CB? Yeah it’d be awesome to land the #1 player but a WR can win you a game..an OLineman? Not as much. Not saying having a lockdown OT isn’t critical to being a championship caliber team but still..
Click to expand...
Go ask Cam Ward what was more beneficial to his success this year; The WR room or Oline. Think that answer is pretty obvious. Also, the odds we beat out a school like LSU, OSU and Bama for a game changing WR is slim. Not until we start producing productive NFL talent there
 
Braduhley said:
Am I the only one who’d rather drop an eye watering amount of money on a game changing skill player like WR or CB? Yeah it’d be awesome to land the #1 player but a WR can win you a game..an OLineman? Not as much. Not saying having a lockdown OT isn’t critical to being a championship caliber team but still..
Click to expand...

We’ve tried.
Unfortunately that doesn’t move the needle enough for skill players for this staff like it does OL.

I’m a by any means necessary guy at the end of the day. Either you get it done or you don’t, and I don’t really GAF how it gets done. Bottomline is we need Cantwell, desperately for 2026. So if they want to give him an insane amount to get it done then good for them. With that being said, I 100% think this is just them stirring up clicks unfortunately. This is how they make their $, aint mad at em.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: DC3
Braduhley said:
Am I the only one who’d rather drop an eye watering amount of money on a game changing skill player like WR or CB? Yeah it’d be awesome to land the #1 player but a WR can win you a game..an OLineman? Not as much. Not saying having a lockdown OT isn’t critical to being a championship caliber team but still..
Click to expand...

Everything starts up front, and having the #1 recruit and #1 OT brings a lot of stability + playing in the ACC he would have his side locked down.

Cantwell also talks to other recruits and he would help build this class and bring a lot of momentum to it.

There’s a reason why Oregon, Ohio State, Miami, Georgia, Michigan, etc all have this guy as the #1 player on their board
 
TheOriginalCane said:
I don't care what you invest in.

Miami gave up 23 sacks in 13 games. Georgia gave up 25 sacks in 14 games. Oregon gave up 21 sacks in 14 games.

It's a useless stat to talk about "losing the sack battle" game-by-game.

We had one sack against Florida, AN SEC TEAM that went 8-5. In the 4th quarter. Up 28 with 12 minutes left. But you won't give credit for that one.

OK, we "lost the sack battle" to Virginia Tech, 3-2. Virginia Tech gave up 34 sacks in 13 games and were ranked 50 spots below Miami in sacks given up. WHO HAS THE BETTER OL?

We "lost the sack battle" to Cal 3-2. Cal gave up 50 sacks in 13 games and were ranked DEAD LAST in Division I-A in sacks allowed. WHO HAS THE BETTER OL?

We "tied the sack battle" with Louisville 3-3. Oh, but we didn't "win the sack battle". You have got to be kidding me.

We "lost the sack battle" with F$U 4-3. Florida State gave up 49 sacks in 12 games and were ranked SECOND-TO-LAST in Division I-A. WHO HAS THE BETTER OL?

We "lost the sack battle" with Duke 2-1. WHO GIVES A ****?

We "lost the sack battle" with GaTech 3-0. This is the only game that means anything, as we lost the game. Was it due to the 3 sacks we gave up? Was it due to getting ZERO sacks on GaTech? We had the ball on the final drive with a chance to win the game and Cam Ward fumbled, that's how close the game was.

The point is, you posted some worthless stat about "not winning the sack battle" in six ACC games in which we went 5-1. At the same time, we gave up less than 2 sacks per game (tied for 57th in the country) and we were #31 in rushing yards per game and #7 in the country in rushing yards per carry (notice the teams that are NOT ahead of us).

So you'll forgive me if I don't "invest" much in your garbage stat of "didn't win the sack battle in 6 out of 8 ACC games" very seriously.



View attachment 325228View attachment 325226
Click to expand...
Oh, you missed the whole deep dive! You should keep reading! I think you would absolutely LOVE the other stuff I posted in this thread!
 
ST26 said:
Go ask Cam Ward what was more beneficial to his success this year; The WR room or Oline. Think that answer is pretty obvious. Also, the odds we beat out a school like LSU, OSU and Bama for a game changing WR is slim. Not until we start producing productive NFL talent there
Click to expand...
You’re not wrong but this kid isn’t Mauigoa

And even Mauigoa was the weak link on the line as a freshman
 
Advertisement
If he picks UGA, Smith will just post "the marathon just started, it ends in December"
 
TheOriginalCane said:
I don't care what you invest in.

Miami gave up 23 sacks in 13 games. Georgia gave up 25 sacks in 14 games. Oregon gave up 21 sacks in 14 games.

It's a useless stat to talk about "losing the sack battle" game-by-game.

We had one sack against Florida, AN SEC TEAM that went 8-5. In the 4th quarter. Up 28 with 12 minutes left. But you won't give credit for that one.

OK, we "lost the sack battle" to Virginia Tech, 3-2. Virginia Tech gave up 34 sacks in 13 games and were ranked 50 spots below Miami in sacks given up. WHO HAS THE BETTER OL?

We "lost the sack battle" to Cal 3-2. Cal gave up 50 sacks in 13 games and were ranked DEAD LAST in Division I-A in sacks allowed. WHO HAS THE BETTER OL?

We "tied the sack battle" with Louisville 3-3. Oh, but we didn't "win the sack battle". You have got to be kidding me.

We "lost the sack battle" with F$U 4-3. Florida State gave up 49 sacks in 12 games and were ranked SECOND-TO-LAST in Division I-A. WHO HAS THE BETTER OL?

We "lost the sack battle" with Duke 2-1. WHO GIVES A ****?

We "lost the sack battle" with GaTech 3-0. This is the only game that means anything, as we lost the game. Was it due to the 3 sacks we gave up? Was it due to getting ZERO sacks on GaTech? We had the ball on the final drive with a chance to win the game and Cam Ward fumbled, that's how close the game was.

The point is, you posted some worthless stat about "not winning the sack battle" in six ACC games in which we went 5-1. At the same time, we gave up less than 2 sacks per game (tied for 57th in the country) and we were #31 in rushing yards per game and #7 in the country in rushing yards per carry (notice the teams that are NOT ahead of us).

So you'll forgive me if I don't "invest" much in your garbage stat of "didn't win the sack battle in 6 out of 8 ACC games" very seriously.



View attachment 325228View attachment 325226
Click to expand...
I've seen this play out several times already. He makes a claim and you respond with data showing that his claim is incorrect. He'll never retract the claim because that would be conceding to you.

People have now reached the point that they will defend the indefensible rather than admit they were wrong. Social media has made that worse. It used to be a sign of weakness.
 
Will Mario beat Rosenhaus like a rented **** if JC doesn’t pick us?
Will he never let him visit a practice again ever?
Will someone make a GIF with Kirby stomping on Mario’s loafer?

These are all highly anticipated questions that need answers.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top