It's all about the X's & O's...

That was what was being said by those who are in the know behind the scenes at UM. It was all over this blog. Point being your a fool if you think UM wouldn’t have spend another 5 million to get a real coach in here. But instead we hired another randy, atleast there names rhyme, manny and randy and will end the same way it ended for randy. Fired and never to be a head coach again and back to being the journeyman DC he always was. Do you see the parallels here?


Really. Who can argue with this kind of logic.

Ok man youre right. Mario wanted back in and Blake was too lazy to even call him back so we hired Manny who rhymes with Randy.

Cause CIS posters said that 's what was going on.
 
Advertisement
Why would anyone want MARIO? He gets laughed at in coaching circles. Even Kevin Patrick talks smack. What offense does MARIO run? What defense? He’s an OL coach. The guys we’d want running the offense wouldn’t work under him. The guys we’d want running the defense wouldn’t either.
The only thing MARIO has going for him is recruiting. Recruiting really isn’t a problem. The dudes are here to be a top 10-15 team. It’s the coaching that we’ve been lacking at either DC or OC and positional coaches for years.
The only good coordinators we’ve had in 15 years...an FSU grad DC with an inept CMR offense and the Gayturd grad OC with Dorito on the other side. Now we’ve got a mediocre version of the FSU grad’s defense with an OC that prefers plays to take light years to develop which result in 3 yard pass plays.
The next hire needs to be a top flight spread HC with experience play calling AND an attacking 4-3 defensive staff already in place.
 
Really. Who can argue with this kind of logic.

Ok man youre right. Mario wanted back in and Blake was too lazy to even call him back so we hired Manny who rhymes with Randy.

Cause CIS posters said that 's what was going on.
And that’s why Blake needs to be fired along with manny at the end of next year if massive improvements and a minimum ten win season isn’t achieved. Period point blank!
 
And that’s why Blake needs to be fired along with manny at the end of next year if massive improvements and a minimum ten win season isn’t achieved. Period point blank!


Dude do you not get sarcasm? Whatever.

Enjoy not watching any games this year unless we win. Done with you and your insanity.
 
Dude do you not get sarcasm? Whatever.

Enjoy not watching any games this year unless we win. Done with you and your insanity.
Good because there’s no helping your insanity homerism. You were probably defending golden right to the end at Clemson and randy right to the end at USF and marky right to the end against whisky. Sunshine pumpers like you don’t live in reality and are part of the problem with this program as you all support the crap product UM has given us the past 15 years. Enjoy wasting your money on UM as you continue to enable them. Lol
 
Advertisement
If we can't run the ball with 12 personnel and a gap-power scheme what makes you think we will run the ball well with a 10 personnel spread running inside zone and duo? Richt tried to run that stuff with and without tempo and we were horrible at it.

I see a long post with very little substance to the recommendations besides "RUN THE SPREAD DAMMIT, PACE & SPACE!" How is this a panacea that's going to solve our problems?

If you think Washington State and Texas have similar concepts and philosophy....well, I don't know what to tell you. 🤷‍♂️
I didn't say that Wash St & Texas have a similar concepts, I said a majority of the top 30 teams in offense take the same approach to offense which is attacking Defenses weaknesses by playing to their strengths, while we do the exact opposite.

The current offense we have was essentially solved by a far interior Central Michigan team, we only produced 17 points & was 1/10 on 3rd down despite being astronomically better than CMU at every single position on the field.

Our OL was getting beat by MAC players who wouldn't even make it on a NFL practice squad, but Enos's ELITE super complex 12, 21 & 22 personnel is perfect right...
 
VS Boise St. they scored 31 pts. in the first half and were held scoreless the rest of the game.

VS Louisville they scored 21 in the 1st Qtr. and didn't score again until the 4th.

Not saying I'm a fan of Enos, but great offenses know how to distribute their points throughout the game.
Vs CENTRAL MICHIGAN we scored 17...
 
Advertisement
I like what he 's trying to accomplish with this offense. THis offense is very hard to prepare for it if you're a defense BUT you need a competent OL line to many breakdowns because of youth/lack of experience. It is NOT a cohesive group now THis is a an offense which will causes defenses too many issues to defend specially with TEs. If you built a foundation on this type of offense it will get us to the promised land BUt there is difficult growing pains and based upon a society of instant gratification do you compromise the foundation. The spread only is exciting and suits many teams but faced with equal or greater talent on defense it sputters more often than succeeds IMHO . Either way, this Enos offense with a good and experienced OL with hurt many defenses.
 
Advertisement
That was the guy I wanted Because he understands the concept and importance of being an elite recruiter and I knew The offense would have been fine, defense ulitmately too

im sorry i gotta jump in here every coach that has left saban has been an elite recruiter. We know what recruiting is about now unless we willing to play that game its not gonna be elite. We literally have coaches that were here and couldn’t recuit sch*t and go to one of those programs and recruited well. Coach Kool and coley as examples. Dont hire a coach based on recruiting if u not gonna change the RECRUITING PHILOSOPHY
 
Guys relax with the Mario stuff. If manny sucks in 3 years we will know manny sucks and if Mario is any good at actually coaching. He can recruit with David’s money that’s for sure but in 3 years we will know the truth and if we need to go out and get him
 
To me the issue with this team on both sides of the ball is scheme more so than personnel.

Particularly on Offense, I've felt we need to go to a Spread Offense since 2016 due to the fact we simply don't have the OL to run the scheme these play callers Miami keeps hiring wants us to run.

WE ARE NOT A POWER RUN UNDER CENTER "PRO STYLE" Offense. We don't have the OT's to protect long enough for 5-7 step Play Action drops & we don't have the the interior line to open up big holes & create sufficient run lanes.

We need to stop fighting against ourselves & transition to a Spread/Air Raid style offense, because 1) we have the Offensive weapons that fit that scheme perfectly & 2) it would neutralize having to always rely on the Defense to be more stout than they're capable of.

We should be beating teams off the fact we have speed & athleticism combined with making them defend the ENTIRE field. The exact same issues we had last year, we have this year, we're slow, predictable & easily shut down on Offense by any DC with half a brain because we don't apply any pressure to Defenses whatsoever, we play right into their hands.

In today's era of College Football you can manufacture yards without having elite talent all over the field, the name of the PACE & SPACE! When you don't have an elite OL with a bunch of maulers & road graders the one thing you don't do is put them in a position to lose by making them block longer than they should. In an uptempo offense the ball is moving quickly on both Pass & Run plays which makes it easier for the OL to sustain quicker blocking assignments & doesn't force them to deal with a pass rush they can't contain.

For whatever reason we keep getting these fckin play callers that think the way to solve our OL issues is to just let them get beat over & over again and then eventually they'll figure it out smfh. Jakai Clark, Zion Nelson, Donaldson & Scaife all looked like sh*t vs CMU, that to me speaks to the coaching staff not properly developing them & not teaching them correctly. It's un-fckin-believable that we haven't had an OL worth a **** in basically 5 years.

We play extremely slow as an offense with these long developing plays that get blown up in the backfield as soon as the ball is snapped. We play with no tempo at all, we should be going at breakneck speed & forcing teams to pick their poison in what they wanna sellout to Defend. PACE & SPACE, you can run the ball effectively out of the Spread while still having a lethal passing attack going with multiple 4-wide sets & when you pickup the pace of play going tempo you keep the Defense on their heels & off balanced.

Look at most of the top 30 teams in Total Offense, Oklahoma, Wash St, Arizona, LSU, Utah St, UCF, Bama, Maryland, Wake Forest, Ok St, Oh St, SMU, Baylor, Texas, Memphis & Boise St, what do they ALL have in common... SCHEME, TEMPO (PACE) & SPACING. The specific scheme may differ from each team in terms of verbiage & play calling, but the concepts are all similar & the overall philosophy is very much the same... ATTACK YOUR OPPONENTS WEAKNESSES WITH YOUR STRENGTHS & SPREAD THE DEFENSE OUT TO OPEN UP THE FIELD.

I've seen enough on this slow antiquated 1995 under center Offense, we're not Wisconsin, or BC, or Iowa, or Michigan State, we don't have the players to run this type of Offense that our OC's keep wanting to run here. We need to get with the times & Spread the got **** ball out & start utilizing our skill players better putting them in position to succeed.

The reason why we always have a bunch of talented under utilized players is because we get these dictator OC's that wanna run these old *** overly & unnecessarily complicated offenses that take 4 years to learn the playbook, while simultaneously never actually yielding any results. What fckin sense does it make to run the most complex offense ever that essentially neutralizes your own skill players & debilitates your OLine & can still be easily beaten by FCS D Coordinators & teams with less talent?

Back in November of last year I made a thread about the next HC candidates I think would do well here, the top guys were Josh Heupel, Mike Norvell, Dino Babers & Neal Brown. My reasoning was, they would bring their high powered offenses to Miami with the caliber of athletes we have which would immediately increase offensive productvity which would get us easy W's vs teams that we're more talented than, which would then also put us in position to go on a run making us a more viable team in the Coastal, which would then make us more attractive to recruits.

Manny was not on my list. I like Manny & am willing to give him time to get it right realizing full well he's not gettin fired in year 1; what my hope is is that Enos gets hired somewhere else after this season (no he's not going to Mich St as a HC, if anything he'll go be a OC for another team or possibly get hired by a MAC/Sun Belt team as a HC) & maybe we can finally get smart & hire a guy from the Oklahoma Air Raid/Spread tree to put us in position to stop playing down to competition.
Exactly how I feel about the program
 
Advertisement
An Air RAID would easily win the Coastal every year. But he honest, would it beat our ultimate goal of passing up Clemson? Not so sure about that. Would love to hear opinions on that.
 
An Air RAID would easily win the Coastal every year. But he honest, would it beat our ultimate goal of passing up Clemson? Not so sure about that. Would love to hear opinions on that.

Depends. Would it mean playing zero defense like every other air raid team out there?
 
Anyone with a set of eyes knows that Patke, Banda, Stubblefield, Baker and Stroud at a minimum have no business coaching at a power 5 school, forgetting about Miami. I am not even sure if the first two are qualified for a Group of 5 school. Working knowledge of football is not needed.

These guys would look a lot better if we weren’t asking them to field the 01 canes defense with a bunch of Soph and unheralded SRs.
 
Advertisement
Back
Top