In addition to the fumble reversal and wiggins TD miss

Advertisement
That was clearly a catch in my opinion. I don’t even think it hit the ground and he controlled it the whole time.

That was a catch, and there wasn’t indisputable evidence. These guys are just making the call in the booth; they aren’t actually reviewing it for error.
 
Advertisement
Oh right. Eh, that one could have gone either way tbh. Hand was going forward. 50/50

Even if was a 50/50 the call on the field was fumble. No way is their conclusive evidence that it wasn't a fumble. So call on the field should have stayed and not overturned. Terrible by these ACC refs!
 
Back
Top