OrangetieFatface
Thunderdome
- Joined
- Oct 16, 2014
- Messages
- 2,736
Give him his last paycheck and walking papers. He is not the great guy he is portrayed as (inside knowledge).
Go on
Give him his last paycheck and walking papers. He is not the great guy he is portrayed as (inside knowledge).
LOL at Scott being the OL coach. Anyone who suggests such absurdity should drown himself in fat guy a$$ juice.
Do you think that's a reason to keep him? Our run game was 117th in the country.LOL at Scott being the OL coach. Anyone who suggests such absurdity should drown himself in fat guy a$$ juice.
He has been the run game coordinator and tight ends coach which basically means he designed all the blocking schemes. Coaching tight ends and the offensive line is the same thing as they both use the same techniques. It is the reason that the offensive line coach is also the tight ends coach.
For passing the tight ends usually go over to the wide receiver coach for drills.
He looked like a pathetic D'Onobrio suck up in that recruiting video. Off with his head!
Pretty sure he will end up being the OL coach though.. I mean where else do you see him coaching? Pretty sure he is being retained so where would you see him coaching, especially as it seems we have an RB and TE coach already. Its not like he has any business coaching WRs. I think he would do well with the OL. But who knows...lol
Only if I had permission of the source, which I don't.Give him his last paycheck and walking papers. He is not the great guy he is portrayed as (inside knowledge).
Go on
Why wouldn't you retain Scott? He's done a great job with the TE's. He's well respected amongst the players and he has built ties with the local area high schools. He is also now a familiar face to recruits being that he has been the head man on the sideline for the past 2 months. You send him to a school to recruit a kid and its a much bigger deal than sending some random TE coach from GA that nobody knows. It would be pretty silly to fire him just to say we "cleaned house."