da truth
1st team All-American
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2013
- Messages
- 4,895
So fsu model is sustainable now? InterestingMaybe then not a good place to spend millions of NIL dollars out of high school?
So fsu model is sustainable now? InterestingMaybe then not a good place to spend millions of NIL dollars out of high school?
See UF 2023.But with this approach, you can't miss in the portal if you need one, otherwise you're super ****ed.
at quarterback it is.So fsu model is sustainable now? Interesting
Every school will need to continue to tinker with how NIL money is spent the most wisely and with greatest ROI. I think NIL spending 5 years from now will look different than today as more data is received. Even without the NCAA’s unnecessary and incompetent meddling.So fsu model is sustainable now? Interesting
Yeah, I'm just older now. Can't handle that kind of grind now. Crootin has gotten more complicated as has player retentionMuch more stressful jobs in life and don’t pay anywhere what these coaches make.
You’re paid 8 million a year for a reason.
They likely go to the portal to get one from the 70% that are transferring.Washington is getting ****ed by doing this. They went all in on Huard to get him to sign. Fenix comes back for one extra year and he bounces, along with their '23 commit flipping to OSU before signing day. Now they don't have **** for depth. 3 QB's on the roster
They likely go to the portal to get one from the 70% that are transferring.
The Purdy approach should be important to kids/parents. Spend four years playing at any P5 and hope for an NFL future.
So fsu model is sustainable now? Interesting
You just signed a top-50 QB. The odds he stays have never been lower
To better understand the ROI of QB recruiting, let’s examine four recruiting classes and see how many QBs succeeded where they signed.theathletic.com
"The Athletic studied the careers of the top 50 high school quarterbacks who signed with FBS programs in the recruiting classes of 2017 through 2020. More than 70 percent have transferred during their time in college."
"Based on these recent classes, if a top-50 QB signee doesn’t start one game in his first two years on campus, there’s an 87 percent chance he’ll end up leaving the program. But among the quarterbacks who did earn a start in their first two years, more than 60 percent still ended up transferring during their careers."
"But 27 of the top 50 have already transferred, including five of the top 10: Ewers, Williams, Sam Huard, Jake Garcia and Jaxson Dart. Many more could enter the portal in May if spring competitions don’t go their way. That’s just how it goes now for young quarterbacks trying to make it in this era of college football: start or depart."
Potentially Florida.Honestly, this is probably correct.
I think QB is one of the most volatile positions on the ranking websites bc they fall in love with physical tools.
But being successful at QB is so much more than physical tools. The mental aspect is typically unaccounted for.
I'm not sold on this thought yet, but taking 1 developmental qb a year and hitting the portal as needed may be the beat move.
But with this approach, you can't miss in the portal if you need one, otherwise you're super ****ed.
We’ll see. FSU’s model is similar to Snyder’s K State endeavors. Load up on veteran players who are older and have years of strength and conditioning. Overwhelm younger teams that are more talented on paper by virtue of this advantage.So fsu model is sustainable now? Interesting