UGA definitely has the alumni base, but they are millionaires, not billionaires. Georgia Tech has the wealthier alumni base but they are more like an Ivy in their lack of interest for sports.Bama and Clemson are the real losers in the NIL battle. They don't have the media markets or billionaire boosters to keep up. It was inevitable that they would fail once capitalism took over and the Good Ole Boys club couldn't illegally corner the market.
I would have thought Georgia with Atlanta and a decent number of ultra-wealthy "friends of the program" could have held par. But they haven't adapted, and in this era it's adapt or die.
Please Please keep her safe, dont let your daughter get in ANY car with anyone associated in Georgia athleticsMy daughter just finished up her freshman year at UGA and works in the athletic department. Can’t wait to hear the excuses that those inside UGA athletics are giving lol
Cal and Stanford has the same issue as Georgia Tech.UGA definitely has the alumni base, but they are millionaires, not billionaires. Georgia Tech has the wealthier alumni base but they are more like an Ivy in their lack of interest for sports.
Oh I have already told her about that. She has her own car and I told her she isn’t to ride with anyone because of Georgia’s reputation of driving recklessPlease Please keep her safe, dont let your daughter get in ANY car with anyone associated in Georgia athletics
Yep and the same attitude towards sports. I explained NIL about 4 years ago to a group of wealthy Tech boosters, all of whom played football at Tech for Bobby Dodd (it was an elderly group), and all of whom donate money to Tech athletics. My point to them was rather than just donate blindly, work with the athletic department and coaches to target specific players.Cal and Stanford has the same issue as Georgia Tech.
Why was this easily predicted in your opinion?Someone predicted this year's ago...
AgreeListen up f@ck Ga Bama n the rest of the sec. Now they want to cap NIL then throw them bags again under the table again. Nawww
That SEC means more **** was just propaganda from espn and media heads. They just paid more, now they can’t. That ****** social media slogan fell apartAgreeListen up f@ck Ga Bama n the rest of the sec. Now they want to cap NIL then throw them bags again under the table again. Nawww, but boy oh boy those days are over SEC what happens to it means more. Instead of everyone else paid more. Stop pockets watching
and get your money
up! There a new sheriff in town and his name is Mario Cristobal.
I think Bama still has money.Bama and Clemson are the real losers in the NIL battle. They don't have the media markets or billionaire boosters to keep up. It was inevitable that they would fail once capitalism took over and the Good Ole Boys club couldn't illegally corner the market.
I would have thought Georgia with Atlanta and a decent number of ultra-wealthy "friends of the program" could have held par. But they haven't adapted, and in this era it's adapt or die.
Bama and Clemson are the real losers in the NIL battle. They don't have the media markets or billionaire boosters to keep up. It was inevitable that they would fail once capitalism took over and the Good Ole Boys club couldn't illegally corner the market.
I would have thought Georgia with Atlanta and a decent number of ultra-wealthy "friends of the program" could have held par. But they haven't adapted, and in this era it's adapt or die.
But you need the right closer at the HC spot. You can have the money but you need those relationships. And you better be able to evaluate
Definitely, but not the level of money that schools in large metro areas do with access to billionaire boosters.I think Bama still has money.
Yup someone sure did. I remember when we were battling them for Joenel Aguero. If i spelt his name right.Someone predicted this year's ago...
I wonder who that was…?Someone predicted this year's ago...