UGA definitely has the alumni base, but they are millionaires, not billionaires. Georgia Tech has the wealthier alumni base but they are more like an Ivy in their lack of interest for sports.Bama and Clemson are the real losers in the NIL battle. They don't have the media markets or billionaire boosters to keep up. It was inevitable that they would fail once capitalism took over and the Good Ole Boys club couldn't illegally corner the market.
I would have thought Georgia with Atlanta and a decent number of ultra-wealthy "friends of the program" could have held par. But they haven't adapted, and in this era it's adapt or die.
Please Please keep her safe, dont let your daughter get in ANY car with anyone associated in Georgia athleticsMy daughter just finished up her freshman year at UGA and works in the athletic department. Can’t wait to hear the excuses that those inside UGA athletics are giving lol
Cal and Stanford has the same issue as Georgia Tech.UGA definitely has the alumni base, but they are millionaires, not billionaires. Georgia Tech has the wealthier alumni base but they are more like an Ivy in their lack of interest for sports.
Oh I have already told her about that. She has her own car and I told her she isn’t to ride with anyone because of Georgia’s reputation of driving recklessPlease Please keep her safe, dont let your daughter get in ANY car with anyone associated in Georgia athletics
Yep and the same attitude towards sports. I explained NIL about 4 years ago to a group of wealthy Tech boosters, all of whom played football at Tech for Bobby Dodd (it was an elderly group), and all of whom donate money to Tech athletics. My point to them was rather than just donate blindly, work with the athletic department and coaches to target specific players.Cal and Stanford has the same issue as Georgia Tech.
Why was this easily predicted in your opinion?Someone predicted this year's ago...