View attachment 204270
They must not teach math at UF. How do we only have 5 points in this guys system? Putting aside he gives 2 points for 3 and 4 stars like they are the same level of player we should have 37 points in his system based on the 247 composite. Of course that puts us in tier 1 and goes against his narrative.
he says 4star is +2 pts, and 3star is -2pts.
Basically what is happening is Miami's LOWEST 4star recruit is Robby Washington with a 93.54 rating. UF has 15 recruits with a rating lower than that 93.54, but are still technically a 4star according to 247 composite. They have 3 players with a rating above our 9th highest rated player.
We can all make up a counting system... **** I'll make one right now that'll devalue quantity and low level players:
>98 = 15pts
96-98 = 10pts
93-96= 7pts
91-93 = 4pts
88-91 = 2pts
86-88 = 1pt
<86 = 0pts.
Then we assign 3pts value for any open spots to get a class size of 25. And subtract 3 pts for every spot above 25 taken. Then divide by 25. Cube root. divide by 0.04. Assign letter grade. Among the top 13 composite ranked teams the results would be:
New Rank (+/- composite), School = Total pts/Class size = Grade ... Letter Grade
1. Bama = 154/20 =
101.8 ... A+
2 (+3). UGA = 117/18 =
95.19 ... A
3 (-1). ND =128/23=
94.26 ... A
4. Ohio St = 115/20 =
93.31 ... A
5. (-2) Texas = 116/22 =
92.1 ... A-
6. LSU = 108/20 =
91.6 ... A-
7 (+2). Miami = 98/17 =
91.36 ... A-
8 (-1). Oklahoma = 102/20 =
90.09 ... A-
9 (-1). Clemson = 99/20 =
89.32 ... B+
10 (+3). USC = 80/15 =
88.26 ... B+
11 (-1). UF = 84/20 =
85.21 ... B
12 (-1). PSU = 78/19 =
84.34 ... B
13 (-1). UTenn = 75/20 =
82.55 ... B-
So what would this methodology tell us? Georgia, Miami, and USC are undervalued because we have have more top end talent then the peers within 3 spots of our composite ranking, AND enough open spots available in the class to further increase the talent gap. It also tells us that Alabama is absolutely dominating with high end talent in this class.