forums

Tears Gator Tears

Advertisement
DTP said:
They know they’re Rashada’s best offer but he so desperately doesn’t want to go to Florida that he keeps delaying his announcement. Imagine being the highest bidder for someone who’s obviously chasing the highest bid and they still don’t want to choose you. You almost feel bad for them.






Nah. F- them
Click to expand...
No, man. That’s clearly not it. He totally really wants to go there because he just clicked with this amazing staff that totally has a great track record of player development. But his dad wants the best money, and even though their offer is way above what everyone else is offering, he just decided to wait a little longer to commit, even though he gets everything he wants. Wait, am I a gator now?
 
mirvin88 said:
How delusional does one have to be to spin a narrative where Napier takes credit for Clemson's run.

Of all the insane things I've heard, that takes first prize.
Click to expand...
They even say that Boyd wasn’t there when Napier was. So even if he was initially involved in the recruitment, by the time Boyd committed was he even still on staff? How on earth could they give him ALL the credit in that recruitment? It’s not like they weren’t hauling in other blue chippers during their run
 
Cryptical Envelopment said:
And… the Anthony Richardson hype train derails.

Click to expand...

He’s got Tanner Mordecai behind AR lmao I’m assuming these are just the top overall QBs and not NFL prospects.

Tanner threw for 39 TDs and 3,600 yards last year. Also a former 4 star QB so it’s not like he’s a nobody. Now playing under Lashlee, dude is a dark horse heisman contender.
 
Advertisement
Please refer to attachment and kindly guess which side looks aggressive and which side looks efficient.
Screenshot_20220618-110238.webp
 
Last edited by a moderator:
oso4lyf said:
Please refer to attachment and kindly guess which side looks aggressive and which side looks efficient.
Click to expand...


I would love to hear the definition of "efficient" recruiting. Does it involve "not overpaying" for a recruit at a position of need WHEN IT ISN'T EVEN UNIVERSITY MONEY, it's money from a private (or public) business?

Gaytors need to make up some t-shirts bragging about their "efficient" recruiting and how they never "overpay"...
 
TheOriginalCane said:
I would love to hear the definition of "efficient" recruiting. Does it involve "not overpaying" for a recruit at a position of need WHEN IT ISN'T EVEN UNIVERSITY MONEY, it's money from a private (or public) business?

Gaytors need to make up some t-shirts bragging about their "efficient" recruiting and how they never "overpay"...
Click to expand...
My thought is quality vs quantity. And they're not very good at that either.

They better hope he can coach because it sure AF seems he can't recruit. How many years did the flagship sign crackhead for?
 
 
TheOriginalCane said:
I don't care what anyone says, John Ruiz has to get out of these Twitter flame wars ASAP.
Click to expand...

I’d prefer him to promote the business and just highlight the student athletes that he’s already signed.

These guys are just trying to bait him to make him look bad but at the same time it’s clicks for @LifeWallet also
 
FIVE RANGZ said:
Mario was a failed head coach at FIU before Saban allowed him to enter Bama's coaching rehab program and was given the AHC job at Bama because of his experience being greater than Napier's at the time.

You're making it sound like being the AHC, OL coach, and recruiting coordinator at Bama, all at once, and receiving more credit than being a single position coach was somehow surprising and a major accomplishment, rather than something that would be completely and totally expected when you hold 3 titles and have a higher status on the staff. You're also making it sound like it's somehow surprising that a program would tap someone with a higher status at a successful program to lead it than a single position coach. Both are laughable.

The SEC took the two best universities from the Big 12 because of money, so I don't really think that makes the point that you think it does. Good programs exist in crappy conferences (see: Clemson); the conferences are still crappy.
Click to expand...
Nick Saban's first 3 years at Michigan State: 6-5-1, 6-6, and 7-5. Not exactly lighting it up. In 2006, Saban went 6-6 at Alabama and Lost to Louisiana-Monroe. So, in an analogy to your analysis, Saban is a terrible coach. He only wins because he has the best players that he cheated and paid to get them. He can't win with average players. He's been mediocre prior to coaching at LSU and Alabama. He was a terrible coach with the Dolphins, so he can't be good anywhere else.

Take your clown show back to Gainesville.!!! We don't want your posing *** here!!!! Who gives a **** if Mario had a losing record at his first head coaching job for a program that barely even existed prior to him. Zero relevance.

Talk about receiving more credit than what they should. You got yourself a coach with ZERO P5 HC experience. Oh, he was a winner at the G5 level. I'm sure that will help you the next time you play UCF.

You talk about the SEC adding 2 more teams. That just pushes UF into further irrelevancy. In 4 years, you'll be looking for a new head coach while UM will be in the CFP.

See you in 2024.
 
Advertisement
TRick72 said:
So Que says the Turds offered Rashada twice the amount that ATM did. Then he says “Jaden wants to be a Gator”. Then he says he’s not yet because “dad wants as much money as possible”.

So help me with this logic, If the kid wants to go there and the dad wants as much money as possible, wouldn’t he already be a Gaturd if they’re offering twice the amount of the next highest bidder??? That seems to me to satisfy the “wants as much money as possible” requirement.
Click to expand...
He’d be committing today if this were true.
 
Back
Top