- Joined
- Oct 5, 2012
- Messages
- 1,430
Wasn’t the perceived “line out the door” for their candidate so they got in early the exact same thing that happened with napier?
Wasn’t the perceived “line out the door” for their candidate so they got in early the exact same thing that happened with napier?
I personally love the revisionist history and the way they’re trying to sell the higher. They continually say that they knew if he got in front of them that he’d win the job. However, the article says that both Kiffin and Drinkwitz turned the job down so they turned to him. So how exactly did he change their minds, and does they really expect anyone to believe that once they met him that he jumped the number one on the wish list.
On top of that, for him to post the tweet about the only meeting, he’s attending is the quarterbacks meeting, kinda makes him a little bit of a scumbag for stringing Tulane alongLie #2: the "cancelled" meeting with Sumrall actually happened.