- Joined
- Jan 30, 2012
- Messages
- 44,301
You don’t need the entire conference to leave to dissolve it. There’s enough teams that could find a home elsewhere.Not enough teams have a better landing spot than the ACC.
You don’t need the entire conference to leave to dissolve it. There’s enough teams that could find a home elsewhere.Not enough teams have a better landing spot than the ACC.
True but a lot of variables remain up in air.Why wouldn't they go to the PAC or Big12? I feel like enough of them could improve their situation and still improve those conferences.
Exactly. I'm thinking if the football schools (Miami-FSU-Clemson) and then the basketball schools (UNC-Duke) say they are leaving....that should prompt the Louisville to leave as well.You don’t need the entire conference to leave to dissolve it. There’s enough teams that could find a home elsewhere.
If only was that easy.You'd think that this could be challenged in court and
Exactly. I'm thinking if the football schools (Miami-FSU-Clemson) and then the basketball schools (UNC-Duke) say they are leaving....that should prompt the Louisville to leave as well.
Those 6 alone will make Notre Dame leave as a basketball only school....and all 7 will have NO PROBLEM getting into another conference.
Syracuse-Wake-Ga. Tech-UVA-VT should easily be able to join the AAC if nothing else.
There aren’t because most of those other teams won’t add equal or greater pieces of the pie to a conference like big 12 in terms of revenue - unless they are willing to take less which they won’t or they would do it now in the accIf only was that easy.
You are basically saying that a bunch of teams should be ok leaving the ACC for the AAC and get paid 50% of what they are getting now.
Good luck with that.
Btw it seems that you would need at least 8 teams, not 7, willing to leave in order to dissolve the conference. Are you sure there are 8 teams with a better landing spot than the ACC? I’m not.
Exactly.There aren’t because most of those other teams won’t add equal or greater pieces of the pie to a conference like big 12 in terms of revenue - unless they are willing to take less which they won’t or they would do it now in the acc
I know you’re just playing but this has been in the works for a while. I was told it will take time; however, I believe we will hear more news this year. TIFWIW.
If it means us then being able to drop out without the payout then yes.I’m sorry but you think taxpayers should pay for FSU to get out of a deal that it signed off on?
![]()
sadly that is the state of affairs the league finds itself in these days.... soon Washington and Oregon will be leaving for Big 10 IMO.As discussed in the Conference realignment thread the problem is not the exit fee but the GOR with the ACC that runs through 2036.
Basically, the ACC owns the TV rights of every school until 2036.
120 million it’s not even close to the real amount of money that you need in order to leave the conference.
Thought I read on here somewhere a while back that if a certain (small) amount of teams decided to leave that there was a clause that the rest of teams could leave w/out penalty? Or something like that?
FSU sent up a trial balloon , earlier comment of setting the battlefield is correct........ let Duke and Wake Forest play football at a lower level and let there Bball teams join big East Bball.......FWIW i see only 60-80 teams in future playing at highest levelAnyone thinking a school like duke is going to the big 12 is laughable. Their admin wouldn’t. And I’m not even sure with their hoops program they bring enough clout to get the overal deal for that conference negotiated net positive for the other members.
That’s what some of you are missing. If the deal doesn’t go up proportionately for the existing members or at least flat they have no interest. Duke needs to ride shogun with UNC to have a shot with the possible exception of the big 10 where the presidents might be good with adding their academic prestige.
Now do the same exercise for every school outside of Clemson fsu Miami UNC and likely UVA.
It’s not just moving pieces relative to the existing cash. It’s do the schools bring more money to the deal and make it more secure long run.
No matter what you think there is going to be a BIG 2. Then a gap and maybe an inbetween 2 or 3, then an even more diminished g5 level.
Whether that’s this year or slowly by 2030 that’s where this is headed.
FSU and Clemson statements will be followed by Miami and Dan - just watch. It’s not that they think they will to uneven with the acc -
It’s that they are trying to show “we tried” as part of both public posturing and future legal wrangling. None of them are going to try and force their own exit and the coat behind that if they think in the next 12-36 months the conference could implode for free
You don’t need the entire conference to leave to dissolve it. There’s enough teams that could find a home elsewhere.
If you think about things logically, losing 30M each year to every B1G and SEC team for over a decade is crippling. IF (that is a big IF) an ACC team could join the SEC or the B1G it’s made up revenue could repay exit fees in less than half that time. So, for a school like FSU or Clemson the decision is not to pay $120M. It is to make $150M MORE over the next 10 years.
You're correct, but that's the problem. There are a minority number of schools that would be in favor of leaving the ACC. The B1G and SEC would likely only take 4 schools. Most of the schools in the ACC would not add value to the SEC or B1G.If enough teams decide to jump ship, shouldn't that force the ACC to dissolve? Then there wouldn't be an ACC GOR deal to buy out...mayYoube I don't understand though.
You are incorrect.If you think about things logically, losing 30M each year to every B1G and SEC team for over a decade is crippling. IF (that is a big IF) an ACC team could join the SEC or the B1G it’s made up revenue could repay exit fees in less than half that time. So, for a school like FSU or Clemson the decision is not to pay $120M. It is to make $150M MORE over the next 10 years.
Louisville, Wake, Duke, and UNC and NCST could be B12 bound...football appeal with Louisville and UNC and major basketball appeal with UNC and Duke. NCST has decent programs in both sports. Wake has a B12-like OFF and would fit in. That's 5 schools.You
You're correct, but that's the problem. There are a minority number of schools that would be in favor of leaving the ACC. The B1G and SEC would likely only take 4 schools. Most of the schools in the ACC would not add value to the SEC or B1G.