forums

Free $$$ Whipple's team covers....again. 2016 Edition.

AntwanJ306 said:
Cane Dynasty said:
More of the same this week.

UMass looks better than we have all year.
Click to expand...

Because they scored against a team that has been outscored 78-10 in its first two games? You're just asking to be embarrassed again this week. Let it go.
Click to expand...

No because their whole team looks better coached that ours. All 3 phases look more betta than us.

I will admit that i haven't seen how well any of their DL can cover the slot yet but I'm hopeful.

Hah...as I type they fake the punt and score a TD!


Fvck Gorlden and the Sissy's.
 
Advertisement
Cane Dynasty said:
AntwanJ306 said:
Cane Dynasty said:
More of the same this week.

UMass looks better than we have all year.
Click to expand...

Because they scored against a team that has been outscored 78-10 in its first two games? You're just asking to be embarrassed again this week. Let it go.
Click to expand...

No because their whole team looks better coached that ours. All 3 phases look more betta than us.

I will admit that i haven't seen how well any of their DL can cover the slot yet but I'm hopeful.

Hah...as I type they fake the punt and score a TD!


Fvck Gorlden and the Sissy's.
Click to expand...

You never answered before......what was it about their 30-7 loss that looked so well coached?
 
AntwanJ306 said:
Cane Dynasty said:
AntwanJ306 said:
Cane Dynasty said:
More of the same this week.

UMass looks better than we have all year.
Click to expand...

Because they scored against a team that has been outscored 78-10 in its first two games? You're just asking to be embarrassed again this week. Let it go.
Click to expand...

No because their whole team looks better coached that ours. All 3 phases look more betta than us.

I will admit that i haven't seen how well any of their DL can cover the slot yet but I'm hopeful.

Hah...as I type they fake the punt and score a TD!


Fvck Gorlden and the Sissy's.
Click to expand...

You never answered before......what was it about their 30-7 loss that looked so well coached?
Click to expand...

The whole team. All 3 phases looked much better than we have since the Radio days and these schleps were D-2 a couple years ago.

It's a fvckin shame or a sham...or both.
 
Another question......who the fack is watching UMass and Vanderbilt? Students from both schools couldn't care less about that game.
 
Cane Dynasty said:
The whole team. All 3 phases looked much better than we have since the Radio days and these schleps were D-2 a couple years ago.

It's a fvckin shame or a sham...or both.
Click to expand...

So you're sticking to your theory that in a 30-7 loss in which they gained 200 yards and allowed over 500 yards that they looked well coached in all three aspects of the game. That's what you're saying.
 
AntwanJ306 said:
Cane Dynasty said:
The whole team. All 3 phases looked much better than we have since the Radio days and these schleps were D-2 a couple years ago.

It's a fvckin shame or a sham...or both.
Click to expand...

So you're sticking to your theory that in a 30-7 loss in which they gained 200 yards and allowed over 500 yards that they looked well coached in all three aspects of the game. That's what you're saying.
Click to expand...

That's not what I said. Go back and try actually reading the words.

Sound them out as you go because you are struggling here sport.
 
Me: What was it about their 30-7 loss that looked so well coached?

You: The whole team.

You might want to go back and edit your post, because spinning it as though I can't read only makes you look dumber than we already think you are.

You actually said that the whole team looked well coached when they got absolutely manhandled by a mediocre team. Well done. Go UMass.
 
Advertisement
Unless you own a time machine what is the point of watching ****box UMass football to give yourself ammo to win an argument over something that happened five years ago?
 
Mark "Play Action Go Route on First Down, Every First Down, No Matter What" Whipple was the ******* worst.

THE WORST.
 
Republicane said:
Unless you own a time machine what is the point of watching ****box UMass football to give yourself ammo to win an argument over something that happened five years ago?
Click to expand...

Sorry. I just like Whip.

I could give a fvck about the whole Radio thing at this point.
 
Whipple got a bad rap here. I watched his offenses at UMass prior to coming to Miami and they were off the hook. Bottom line is an Offensive Coordinator lives or dies with the decision making of a QB and Whipple had Jacory making decisions. Enough said. Whipple actually is pretty good OC if you give him the keys to the car and let him go.
 
Advertisement
Fronhapfel ends up at Umass as a transfer QB and we wind up with Jake forkin Heaps.

It's hard to take what's happened to us. Fvckin Corley.
 
We're getting outrageous with the "every squad is better than ours" mantra... Umass isn't close to being better than our team... I also doubt they are well coached....
 
Back
Top