You gotta stop with this culture nonsense. If you want a winning culture, you have to win games. That's where good coaches play a huge role. Coaches need to find a way to get Ws even if the players are tripping all over themselves. Once the team starts winning games, the players will start to believe that they are capable of winning and they also have faith the staff will put them in a position to win games. The coaching staff builds on that and makes sure the players remember how terrible it feels to lose a game, and then the players start putting in the work on their own so they don't experience that feeling again.
UM just had the posterboy for college football culture as the HC a few years ago. Mark Richt was the program builder, the guy who was supposed to bring a winning culture to UM. He won 9 games his 1st season with a team that was 95% Al Golden players- a group so bad it got the previous HC fired mid-season. In his 2nd season he won 10 games, again with a roster that was around 60-70% Al Golden "loser" recruits. And then in his third season, when the majority of the team was Mark Richt recruits, the team finishes one game over .500 and essentially causes him to resign rather than fire his staff. So these Mark Richt "winning culture" recruits then finish at .500 under Diaz the following year including the loss to FIU and getting blanked by La Tech.
According to fan logic, this should have been impossible because Coach Culture, Mark Richt, recruited and taught these players. Even with a bad coach like Diaz, the roster of winners shouldn't have needed Diaz to coach them to victory, they should have been able to motivate themselves.