Figueroa's Instagram Post

[ABear]

Why can't police reports be used substantively as evidence at trial?

I'll give 1000 internets to the Google Lawyer who can answer that correctly.

police rpoerts are hearsay not entitled to the business reocrd exception of Rule 803

You will need to answer the question more fully in order to win the prize.

ya, he has given us the technical reason. the technical reason is probably not the best explanation for lay folks on a message board

Yeah, we need the policy, not the rule.

-- ya wtf is Rule 803? where the **** did that even come from .. you god **** yuppies

 

[The Franchise]

Everyone could be anyone behind a computer, bruh. The fact is, the bum admitted to doing the crime, so why in the **** would he not be kicked off the team?? Innocent until proven guilty, right? These weren't minors that made a statement under duress by the police dept...these were grown men who admitted to doing wrong. They implicated themselves! Maybe you would have a point if they denied the accusations...but my ninja, they admitted to doing it. That's his fault, bruh!

I pray to God you don't have a daughter, homie. Some things are more important than sports.

Let me help you. Let's start with the basics. Do you think that a police report is the final word in a criminal case? For instance, do you think that if a police report says "Rellyrell admitted to raping a goat at 1400 hours on December 12, 2014" that is absolute proof that Rellyrell raped a goat or that he admitted to raping a goat? If you deny having admitted that or having done that, do you think you have any recourse, or are you automatically guilty because the police report says you did it?

When I got popped, whether I did it or not, I said nothing. You are alleged to do something when you don't speak. That's why Winston was alleged to raping that chick and therefore he did no time w/o proof. The moment you snitch on yourself, that's when the report comes out that you admitted to doing the crime, even if you try to recant your statement later. If it was a false report, guess what? He has a great chance of a law suit against that police dept. The fact that there is no lawsuit would indicate that the report was accurate.

So because they weren't experienced criminals like you and talked to the cops that means they are automatically guilty of everything in the police report? Why do they bother with criminal trials if everything in the police report is taken as conclusive proof?

first off, idiot, the whole point was them being kicked off the team. wtf does going to trial and all that bull have to do numbnuts, like yourself, doing something stupid. neither one of them deserves to be on this football team. you're probably the same tramp that thinks that darren sharper is innocent too b/c he played for your favorite football team, huh? foh.

Look at this pathetic guttersnipe mental cripple. I try to help you, and you turn on me like an emotional 10 year old girl.

I'll try again, mental cripple. Guys shouldn't get kicked off teams or pronounced guilty of crimes until all the facts are gathered and the system makes a final declaration.

There's no need to jump to conclusions and act before gathering facts in order to appease morons like you. You're the type of stupid piece of **** who would go running to a lawyer crying for help the minute you get pinched for something, yet you think no one else deserves the same benefit of the doubt that you do.

Innocent until PROVEN guilty, you low-functioning dreg. Proven is the key word there. Look up the definition.

 

[ABear]

Let me help you. Let's start with the basics. Do you think that a police report is the final word in a criminal case? For instance, do you think that if a police report says "Rellyrell admitted to raping a goat at 1400 hours on December 12, 2014" that is absolute proof that Rellyrell raped a goat or that he admitted to raping a goat? If you deny having admitted that or having done that, do you think you have any recourse, or are you automatically guilty because the police report says you did it?

When I got popped, whether I did it or not, I said nothing. You are alleged to do something when you don't speak. That's why Winston was alleged to raping that chick and therefore he did no time w/o proof. The moment you snitch on yourself, that's when the report comes out that you admitted to doing the crime, even if you try to recant your statement later. If it was a false report, guess what? He has a great chance of a law suit against that police dept. The fact that there is no lawsuit would indicate that the report was accurate.

So because they weren't experienced criminals like you and talked to the cops that means they are automatically guilty of everything in the police report? Why do they bother with criminal trials if everything in the police report is taken as conclusive proof?

first off, idiot, the whole point was them being kicked off the team. wtf does going to trial and all that bull have to do numbnuts, like yourself, doing something stupid. neither one of them deserves to be on this football team. you're probably the same tramp that thinks that darren sharper is innocent too b/c he played for your favorite football team, huh? foh.

Look at this pathetic guttersnipe mental cripple. I try to help you, and you turn on me like an emotional 10 year old girl.

I'll try again, mental cripple. Guys shouldn't get kicked off teams or pronounced guilty of crimes until all the facts are gathered and the system makes a final declaration.

There's no need to jump to conclusions and act before gathering facts in order to appease morons like you. You're the type of stupid piece of **** who would go running to a lawyer crying for help the minute you get pinched for something, yet you think no one else deserves the same benefit of the doubt that you do.

Innocent until PROVEN guilty, you low-functioning dreg. Proven is the key word there. Look up the definition.

This ... it's almost like out admin is filled with a bunch of gutless fa.gtown liberals

 

[bbcane]

Coach/admin. - what the ---- happened?

Blue/figs- we drugged and rapped a soccer player.

Coach/admin - well, let's see if they can prove it.


to bad wasn't your daughter.

 

[Rellyrell]

Let me help you. Let's start with the basics. Do you think that a police report is the final word in a criminal case? For instance, do you think that if a police report says "Rellyrell admitted to raping a goat at 1400 hours on December 12, 2014" that is absolute proof that Rellyrell raped a goat or that he admitted to raping a goat? If you deny having admitted that or having done that, do you think you have any recourse, or are you automatically guilty because the police report says you did it?

When I got popped, whether I did it or not, I said nothing. You are alleged to do something when you don't speak. That's why Winston was alleged to raping that chick and therefore he did no time w/o proof. The moment you snitch on yourself, that's when the report comes out that you admitted to doing the crime, even if you try to recant your statement later. If it was a false report, guess what? He has a great chance of a law suit against that police dept. The fact that there is no lawsuit would indicate that the report was accurate.

So because they weren't experienced criminals like you and talked to the cops that means they are automatically guilty of everything in the police report? Why do they bother with criminal trials if everything in the police report is taken as conclusive proof?

first off, idiot, the whole point was them being kicked off the team. wtf does going to trial and all that bull have to do numbnuts, like yourself, doing something stupid. neither one of them deserves to be on this football team. you're probably the same tramp that thinks that darren sharper is innocent too b/c he played for your favorite football team, huh? foh.

Look at this pathetic guttersnipe mental cripple. I try to help you, and you turn on me like an emotional 10 year old girl.

I'll try again, mental cripple. Guys shouldn't get kicked off teams or pronounced guilty of crimes until all the facts are gathered and the system makes a final declaration.

There's no need to jump to conclusions and act before gathering facts in order to appease morons like you. You're the type of stupid piece of **** who would go running to a lawyer crying for help the minute you get pinched for something, yet you think no one else deserves the same benefit of the doubt that you do.

Innocent until PROVEN guilty, you low-functioning dreg. Proven is the key word there. Look up the definition.

Did you forget to d***e today, my ninja? is it that time of the month for you? Let's cut to the chase, b/c i've seen all of your post and i'm convinced your iq level is somewhere between an elk w/ rabbis and ticks and a shoe that has dog ish all over it. So let me type this s-l-o-w-l-y f-o-r y-o-u O-K, Barney Fife? I just need a simple yes or no answer from you, do you think you can handle that Frankie? When we had the thread on FSU's handling of Famous Jameis Winston, did you agree with them?

 

[dk72]

Coach/admin. - what the ---- happened?

Blue/figs- we drugged and rapped a soccer player.

Coach/admin - well, let's see if they can prove it.


to bad wasn't your daughter.

Exactly. Sad that some seem to think that legal technicalities and "being able to get away with it" are all that matters. The kids admitted to what they did. The coaches did the right thing and booted them. End of story.

 

[The Franchise]

When I got popped, whether I did it or not, I said nothing. You are alleged to do something when you don't speak. That's why Winston was alleged to raping that chick and therefore he did no time w/o proof. The moment you snitch on yourself, that's when the report comes out that you admitted to doing the crime, even if you try to recant your statement later. If it was a false report, guess what? He has a great chance of a law suit against that police dept. The fact that there is no lawsuit would indicate that the report was accurate.

So because they weren't experienced criminals like you and talked to the cops that means they are automatically guilty of everything in the police report? Why do they bother with criminal trials if everything in the police report is taken as conclusive proof?

first off, idiot, the whole point was them being kicked off the team. wtf does going to trial and all that bull have to do numbnuts, like yourself, doing something stupid. neither one of them deserves to be on this football team. you're probably the same tramp that thinks that darren sharper is innocent too b/c he played for your favorite football team, huh? foh.

Look at this pathetic guttersnipe mental cripple. I try to help you, and you turn on me like an emotional 10 year old girl.

I'll try again, mental cripple. Guys shouldn't get kicked off teams or pronounced guilty of crimes until all the facts are gathered and the system makes a final declaration.

There's no need to jump to conclusions and act before gathering facts in order to appease morons like you. You're the type of stupid piece of **** who would go running to a lawyer crying for help the minute you get pinched for something, yet you think no one else deserves the same benefit of the doubt that you do.

Innocent until PROVEN guilty, you low-functioning dreg. Proven is the key word there. Look up the definition.

Did you forget to d***e today, my ninja? is it that time of the month for you? Let's cut to the chase, b/c i've seen all of your post and i'm convinced your iq level is somewhere between an elk w/ rabbis and ticks and a shoe that has dog ish all over it. So let me type this s-l-o-w-l-y f-o-r y-o-u O-K, Barney Fife? I just need a simple yes or no answer from you, do you think you can handle that Frankie? When we had the thread on FSU's handling of Famous Jameis Winston, did you agree with them?

Answer these questions for me, mongrel: Do you still wear the Fat Albert jeans your mom got for you at the flea market? Do you have really tiny ears that are so low they look like they're coming out of your neck?

 

[Gatorhater]

Coach/admin. - what the ---- happened?

Blue/figs- we drugged and rapped a soccer player.

Coach/admin - well, let's see if they can prove it.


to bad wasn't your daughter.

Exactly. Sad that some seem to think that legal technicalities and "being able to get away with it" are all that matters. The kids admitted to what they did. The coaches did the right thing and booted them. End of story.

Might be the only thing Al has done right in 4 years. The problem is comparing it to criminoles handling of Rapist. Jimbo and nole administration should be in jail as accessories after the fact. Rapist should have been suspended while the investigation proceeded from the first report. You can bet your sweet rear there would not been a two year delay in process then. Al sucks as a football coach and maybe even a human being but given the admission it is hard to fault him here.

 

[OrangetieFatface]

Coach/admin. - what the ---- happened?

Blue/figs- we drugged and rapped a soccer player.

Coach/admin - well, let's see if they can prove it.


to bad wasn't your daughter.

Exactly. Sad that some seem to think that legal technicalities and "being able to get away with it" are all that matters. The kids admitted to what they did. The coaches did the right thing and booted them. End of story.

Way to go coaches. Attrition isn't a problem, and neither is personality evaluation or people management. A+

 

[Rellyrell]

So because they weren't experienced criminals like you and talked to the cops that means they are automatically guilty of everything in the police report? Why do they bother with criminal trials if everything in the police report is taken as conclusive proof?

first off, idiot, the whole point was them being kicked off the team. wtf does going to trial and all that bull have to do numbnuts, like yourself, doing something stupid. neither one of them deserves to be on this football team. you're probably the same tramp that thinks that darren sharper is innocent too b/c he played for your favorite football team, huh? foh.

Look at this pathetic guttersnipe mental cripple. I try to help you, and you turn on me like an emotional 10 year old girl.

I'll try again, mental cripple. Guys shouldn't get kicked off teams or pronounced guilty of crimes until all the facts are gathered and the system makes a final declaration.

There's no need to jump to conclusions and act before gathering facts in order to appease morons like you. You're the type of stupid piece of **** who would go running to a lawyer crying for help the minute you get pinched for something, yet you think no one else deserves the same benefit of the doubt that you do.

Innocent until PROVEN guilty, you low-functioning dreg. Proven is the key word there. Look up the definition.

Did you forget to d***e today, my ninja? is it that time of the month for you? Let's cut to the chase, b/c i've seen all of your post and i'm convinced your iq level is somewhere between an elk w/ rabbis and ticks and a shoe that has dog ish all over it. So let me type this s-l-o-w-l-y f-o-r y-o-u O-K, Barney Fife? I just need a simple yes or no answer from you, do you think you can handle that Frankie? When we had the thread on FSU's handling of Famous Jameis Winston, did you agree with them?

Answer these questions for me, mongrel: Do you still wear the Fat Albert jeans your mom got for you at the flea market? Do you have really tiny ears that are so low they look like they're coming out of your neck?

Lol.....oh Frankie. You know what's interesting; the fact that this was your response showed a lot. See, I would've respected you if you would've said, "**** naw I didn't agree w/ them, F FSU...I'm concerned about my Canes." But see, you didn't go that route, you took the b**ch approach.

My ninja, allow me to answer my own question for you. On 11-16-2013 from the "Jameis is a rapist (allegedly)" thread your response was this:

-LULZ. FSU cover this **** up. Period. They either bought the chick's silence or the Tallahassee PD did Jizzbo and the school a favor. The fact that Jemima was a relative nobody at the time actually makes the cover-up easier because there was no media attention on him. Made it much easier for them to sweep it under the carpet....-

See Frankie, in your "detailed explanation" you accused FSU of covering up a crime. In essence, you stated that Winston was guilty, even though he never admitted to doing anything nor was there court proven evidence that substiantiated that he did anything wrong. I'm pretty sure it's b/c he dawned the garnett and gold.

However, Figueroa was accused of the same crime, and more importantly turned himself in and confessed to the crime, Miami kicked him off the team...yet, you are stating that they acted too rash?? So you slam FSU for covering up an alleged crime, and you slam UM for kicking off a player who admitted an egegious mistake???

See, like b**ch in heat, you can't make up your **** mind. You're a joke, homie. Miss me w/ your "mongrel, and tiny ears" bull ish, dog. Go get your pap smear, then holla at me, trick.

And for the record, anyone that ain't making the Canes better, can kiss my ***. So no, I don't support F.A.G (although, ironically, it was you who used to have a F.A.G avatar in support of him). No I don't support D'Onofrio. No I don't support Paul Williams. And no I don't support no b**ch *** ninja who tricked off a scholly to play at the greatest University in the world when no one else gave him a chance. F him and F u if you support any of the above mentioned.

 

[TpaBayFlyFisher]

Pardon me Frans.........

"Innocent until PROVEN guilty, you low-functioning dreg. Proven is the key word there. Look up the definition."

I am sure that you understand that concept applies ONLY where a government it taking away one's liberty. It has no application in the workplace or school.........but carry on.

 

[The Franchise]

Pardon me Frans.........

"Innocent until PROVEN guilty, you low-functioning dreg. Proven is the key word there. Look up the definition."

I am sure that you understand that concept applies ONLY where a government it taking away one's liberty. It has no application in the workplace or school.........but carry on.

No. It applies everywhere. If you're going to pass judgment on people, and you don't wait for all the facts to come in, then you're nothing but a reactionary pu$$y looking to appease a bunch of a$$holes who are going to give you **** no matter what you do.

 

[ABear]

Pardon me Frans.........

"Innocent until PROVEN guilty, you low-functioning dreg. Proven is the key word there. Look up the definition."

I am sure that you understand that concept applies ONLY where a government it taking away one's liberty. It has no application in the workplace or school.........but carry on.

No. It applies everywhere. If you're going to pass judgment on people, and you don't wait for all the facts to come in, then you're nothing but a reactionary pu$$y looking to appease a bunch of a$$holes who are going to give you **** no matter what you do.

yep, the court system mirrors how people should be treated in general.

everyone deserves to be treated fairly ... not thrown under the bus for some **** **** campus police report

 

[The Franchise]

first off, idiot, the whole point was them being kicked off the team. wtf does going to trial and all that bull have to do numbnuts, like yourself, doing something stupid. neither one of them deserves to be on this football team. you're probably the same tramp that thinks that darren sharper is innocent too b/c he played for your favorite football team, huh? foh.

Look at this pathetic guttersnipe mental cripple. I try to help you, and you turn on me like an emotional 10 year old girl.

I'll try again, mental cripple. Guys shouldn't get kicked off teams or pronounced guilty of crimes until all the facts are gathered and the system makes a final declaration.

There's no need to jump to conclusions and act before gathering facts in order to appease morons like you. You're the type of stupid piece of **** who would go running to a lawyer crying for help the minute you get pinched for something, yet you think no one else deserves the same benefit of the doubt that you do.

Innocent until PROVEN guilty, you low-functioning dreg. Proven is the key word there. Look up the definition.

Did you forget to d***e today, my ninja? is it that time of the month for you? Let's cut to the chase, b/c i've seen all of your post and i'm convinced your iq level is somewhere between an elk w/ rabbis and ticks and a shoe that has dog ish all over it. So let me type this s-l-o-w-l-y f-o-r y-o-u O-K, Barney Fife? I just need a simple yes or no answer from you, do you think you can handle that Frankie? When we had the thread on FSU's handling of Famous Jameis Winston, did you agree with them?

Answer these questions for me, mongrel: Do you still wear the Fat Albert jeans your mom got for you at the flea market? Do you have really tiny ears that are so low they look like they're coming out of your neck?

Lol.....oh Frankie. You know what's interesting; the fact that this was your response showed a lot. See, I would've respected you if you would've said, "**** naw I didn't agree w/ them, F FSU...I'm concerned about my Canes." But see, you didn't go that route, you took the b**ch approach.

My ninja, allow me to answer my own question for you. On 11-16-2013 from the "Jameis is a rapist (allegedly)" thread your response was this:

-LULZ. FSU cover this **** up. Period. They either bought the chick's silence or the Tallahassee PD did Jizzbo and the school a favor. The fact that Jemima was a relative nobody at the time actually makes the cover-up easier because there was no media attention on him. Made it much easier for them to sweep it under the carpet....-

See Frankie, in your "detailed explanation" you accused FSU of covering up a crime. In essence, you stated that Winston was guilty, even though he never admitted to doing anything nor was there court proven evidence that substiantiated that he did anything wrong. I'm pretty sure it's b/c he dawned the garnett and gold.

However, Figueroa was accused of the same crime, and more importantly turned himself in and confessed to the crime, Miami kicked him off the team...yet, you are stating that they acted too rash?? So you slam FSU for covering up an alleged crime, and you slam UM for kicking off a player who admitted an egegious mistake???

See, like b**ch in heat, you can't make up your **** mind. You're a joke, homie. Miss me w/ your "mongrel, and tiny ears" bull ish, dog. Go get your pap smear, then holla at me, trick.

And for the record, anyone that ain't making the Canes better, can kiss my ***. So no, I don't support F.A.G (although, ironically, it was you who used to have a F.A.G avatar in support of him). No I don't support D'Onofrio. No I don't support Paul Williams. And no I don't support no b**ch *** ninja who tricked off a scholly to play at the greatest University in the world when no one else gave him a chance. F him and F u if you support any of the above mentioned.

I hang the gold "#1 ******" medal around your neck and declare you winner of this thread. Congratulations!

 

[The Franchise]

Pardon me Frans.........

"Innocent until PROVEN guilty, you low-functioning dreg. Proven is the key word there. Look up the definition."

I am sure that you understand that concept applies ONLY where a government it taking away one's liberty. It has no application in the workplace or school.........but carry on.

No. It applies everywhere. If you're going to pass judgment on people, and you don't wait for all the facts to come in, then you're nothing but a reactionary pu$$y looking to appease a bunch of a$$holes who are going to give you **** no matter what you do.

yep, the court system mirrors how people should be treated in general.

everyone deserves to be treated fairly ... not thrown under the bus for some **** **** campus police report

Bravo. Like I've said before, the same guys ready to throw dirt on Figs based on a few lines in a police report are the same hypocrites who would be screaming foul and crying for a lawyer if they felt like they got wronged by the police or that they didn't say what the police said they did.

Remember when Antrel Rolle got accused of some heinous crimes in a police report his last year here at UM? Turned out none of the **** that was in that report was true. But if you listen to the knee-jerk dycks-for-brains in this thread Coker should have immediately tossed him from the team based on the police report.

 

[ABear]

Pardon me Frans.........

"Innocent until PROVEN guilty, you low-functioning dreg. Proven is the key word there. Look up the definition."

I am sure that you understand that concept applies ONLY where a government it taking away one's liberty. It has no application in the workplace or school.........but carry on.

No. It applies everywhere. If you're going to pass judgment on people, and you don't wait for all the facts to come in, then you're nothing but a reactionary pu$$y looking to appease a bunch of a$$holes who are going to give you **** no matter what you do.

yep, the court system mirrors how people should be treated in general.

everyone deserves to be treated fairly ... not thrown under the bus for some **** **** campus police report

Bravo. Like I've said before, the same guys ready to throw dirt on Figs based on a few lines in a police report are the same hypocrites who would be screaming foul and crying for a lawyer if they felt like they got wronged by the police or that they didn't say what the police said they did.

Remember when Antrel Rolle got accused of some heinous crimes in a police report his last year here at UM? Turned out none of the **** that was in that report was true. But if you listen to the knee-jerk dycks-for-brains in this thread Coker should have immediately tossed him from the team based on the police report.

anecdote here -- law student -- been royally ****ed by the UM campus police in the past.

- if one of the spanish, *****-***, detectives decides he does not like you ... you will be spending a few days in jail. There is literally nothing you can do about it.

- Then stuff gets sorted out once everyone realizes the report is bull**** -- but your life is derailed for at least a year.

- The UM admin just rolls with it though -- they assume the report is legit ... obviously they will back their own police department

 

[TpaBayFlyFisher]

Pardon me Frans.........

"Innocent until PROVEN guilty, you low-functioning dreg. Proven is the key word there. Look up the definition."

I am sure that you understand that concept applies ONLY where a government it taking away one's liberty. It has no application in the workplace or school.........but carry on.

No. It applies everywhere. If you're going to pass judgment on people, and you don't wait for all the facts to come in, then you're nothing but a reactionary pu$$y looking to appease a bunch of a$$holes who are going to give you **** no matter what you do.

yep, the court system mirrors how people should be treated in general.

everyone deserves to be treated fairly ... not thrown under the bus for some **** **** campus police report

Sorry to burst your leftist utopian bubble but-YOU ARE WRONG!

Where the rules and regulations of a private institution of learning provides that a student may forfeit his connection with the institution if he is not in accord with its standards, the institution is not required to prefer charges and prove them at trial before dismissing permanently or temporarily a student regarded by it as undesirable.
John B. Stetson University v. Hunt, 88 Fla. 510, 102 So. 637 (Fla. 1925).

Where there is not an agreed upon, definite term of employment, an employment agreement is terminable at the will of either the employer or the employee without cause. Liff v. City of Cocoa 745 So.2d 441 (Fla. 5 DCA 1999).

Please send me my customary fee for this legal education.

 

[The Franchise]

Pardon me Frans.........

"Innocent until PROVEN guilty, you low-functioning dreg. Proven is the key word there. Look up the definition."

I am sure that you understand that concept applies ONLY where a government it taking away one's liberty. It has no application in the workplace or school.........but carry on.

No. It applies everywhere. If you're going to pass judgment on people, and you don't wait for all the facts to come in, then you're nothing but a reactionary pu$$y looking to appease a bunch of a$$holes who are going to give you **** no matter what you do.

yep, the court system mirrors how people should be treated in general.

everyone deserves to be treated fairly ... not thrown under the bus for some **** **** campus police report

Sorry to burst your leftist utopian bubble but-YOU ARE WRONG!

Where the rules and regulations of a private institution of learning provides that a student may forfeit his connection with the institution if he is not in accord with its standards, the institution is not required to prefer charges and prove them at trial before dismissing permanently or temporarily a student regarded by it as undesirable.
John B. Stetson University v. Hunt, 88 Fla. 510, 102 So. 637 (Fla. 1925).

Where there is not an agreed upon, definite term of employment, an employment agreement is terminable at the will of either the employer or the employee without cause. Liff v. City of Cocoa 745 So.2d 441 (Fla. 5 DCA 1999).

Are you goofy enough to think that anyone is arguing that UM couldn't thrown them out? No one ever said that. Pretty sure everyone knows UM had the right to throw them out. The only thing people are saying is that they should have waited and let the thing play out prior to throwing them out instead of caving to the big-mouth assh0les who will think UM is a renegade program no matter how hard they try to re-invent themselves as choirboys. The ******* crew sees a police report, and they immediately rush to judgment.

These same assh0les would have thrown Antrel Rolle out of school when he was wrongly accused of some serious crimes in a police report.

 

[ABear]

Pardon me Frans.........

"Innocent until PROVEN guilty, you low-functioning dreg. Proven is the key word there. Look up the definition."

I am sure that you understand that concept applies ONLY where a government it taking away one's liberty. It has no application in the workplace or school.........but carry on.

No. It applies everywhere. If you're going to pass judgment on people, and you don't wait for all the facts to come in, then you're nothing but a reactionary pu$$y looking to appease a bunch of a$$holes who are going to give you **** no matter what you do.

yep, the court system mirrors how people should be treated in general.

everyone deserves to be treated fairly ... not thrown under the bus for some **** **** campus police report

Sorry to burst your leftist utopian bubble but-YOU ARE WRONG!

Where the rules and regulations of a private institution of learning provides that a student may forfeit his connection with the institution if he is not in accord with its standards, the institution is not required to prefer charges and prove them at trial before dismissing permanently or temporarily a student regarded by it as undesirable.
John B. Stetson University v. Hunt, 88 Fla. 510, 102 So. 637 (Fla. 1925).

Where there is not an agreed upon, definite term of employment, an employment agreement is terminable at the will of either the employer or the employee without cause. Liff v. City of Cocoa 745 So.2d 441 (Fla. 5 DCA 1999).

Please send me my customary fee for this legal education.

sorry my "**** face, try-hard f.a.g." radar is going off like crazy right now.

I wasn't saying what it is.

I was saying what it should be.

You can jump off of Westlaw now and maybe into Biscayne Bay or something

 

[Canes_239]

Smh