Figueroa's Instagram Post

[Rellyrell]

You all need to stfu about drugging her and raping her and them admitting to that. Quotes or gtfo.

Even if she was drugged, prove they drugged her. Prove they knew she was drugged.
Prove she didn't consent bc that's their defense

Cot dam At the dumb mutha****as on here.

/ and at the []_[] who made the knee jerk decision to kick these kids out of school

so now you a FSU fan or something?

No. I'm a UM law alum. I'm a prosecutor and was an assistant state attorney for about six years prior. Also did criminal defense for about three years.

Everyone could be anyone behind a computer, bruh. The fact is, the bum admitted to doing the crime, so why in the **** would he not be kicked off the team?? Innocent until proven guilty, right? These weren't minors that made a statement under duress by the police dept...these were grown men who admitted to doing wrong. They implicated themselves! Maybe you would have a point if they denied the accusations...but my ninja, they admitted to doing it. That's his fault, bruh!

I pray to God you don't have a daughter, homie. Some things are more important than sports.

 

[Rellyrell]

You all need to stfu about drugging her and raping her and them admitting to that. Quotes or gtfo.

Even if she was drugged, prove they drugged her. Prove they knew she was drugged.
Prove she didn't consent bc that's their defense

Cot dam At the dumb mutha****as on here.

/ and at the []_[] who made the knee jerk decision to kick these kids out of school

so now you a FSU fan or something?

No. I'm a UM law alum. I'm a prosecutor and was an assistant state attorney for about six years prior. Also did criminal defense for about three years.

Why even bother with these frogs? They don't realize that part of the problem with this program is that we treat our kids like garbage.

ay dog, if you're daughter ever gets drugged and raped by a football player and the school makes it appear that your daughter was a ****, i don't wanna hear ish from you.

 

[ABear]

You all need to stfu about drugging her and raping her and them admitting to that. Quotes or gtfo.

Even if she was drugged, prove they drugged her. Prove they knew she was drugged.
Prove she didn't consent bc that's their defense

Cot dam At the dumb mutha****as on here.

/ and at the []_[] who made the knee jerk decision to kick these kids out of school

so now you a FSU fan or something?

No. I'm a UM law alum. I'm a prosecutor and was an assistant state attorney for about six years prior. Also did criminal defense for about three years.

Everyone could be anyone behind a computer, bruh. The fact is, the bum admitted to doing the crime, so why in the **** would he not be kicked off the team?? Innocent until proven guilty, right? These weren't minors that made a statement under duress by the police dept...these were grown men who admitted to doing wrong. They implicated themselves! Maybe you would have a point if they denied the accusations...but my ninja, they admitted to doing it. That's his fault, bruh!

I pray to God you don't have a daughter, homie. Some things are more important than sports.

can someone send me a link showing that Figs "admitted to the crime"

 

[TC7D]

You all need to stfu about drugging her and raping her and them admitting to that. Quotes or gtfo.

Even if she was drugged, prove they drugged her. Prove they knew she was drugged.
Prove she didn't consent bc that's their defense

Cot dam At the dumb mutha****as on here.

/ and at the []_[] who made the knee jerk decision to kick these kids out of school

so now you a FSU fan or something?

No. I'm a UM law alum. I'm a prosecutor and was an assistant state attorney for about six years prior. Also did criminal defense for about three years.

Everyone could be anyone behind a computer, bruh. The fact is, the bum admitted to doing the crime, so why in the **** would he not be kicked off the team?? Innocent until proven guilty, right? These weren't minors that made a statement under duress by the police dept...these were grown men who admitted to doing wrong. They implicated themselves! Maybe you would have a point if they denied the accusations...but my ninja, they admitted to doing it. That's his fault, bruh!

I pray to God you don't have a daughter, homie. Some things are more important than sports.

can someone send me a link showing that Figs "admitted to the crime"

http://www.masslive.com/sports/index.ssf/2014/07/university_of_miami_football_p.html

Blue and Figueroa were jailed in lieu of $10,000 bail each and, if released, they will be banned from the Miami campus. The Coral Gables police report said the victim first reported the assault to university police, which turned to the Coral Gables department to investigate.

The two turned themselves in Tuesday and admitted "buying and administering several alcohol beverages" for the victim and then performing *** acts without her consent, the police report says.

 

[Rellyrell]

You all need to stfu about drugging her and raping her and them admitting to that. Quotes or gtfo.

Even if she was drugged, prove they drugged her. Prove they knew she was drugged.
Prove she didn't consent bc that's their defense

Cot dam At the dumb mutha****as on here.

/ and at the []_[] who made the knee jerk decision to kick these kids out of school

so now you a FSU fan or something?

No. I'm a UM law alum. I'm a prosecutor and was an assistant state attorney for about six years prior. Also did criminal defense for about three years.

Everyone could be anyone behind a computer, bruh. The fact is, the bum admitted to doing the crime, so why in the **** would he not be kicked off the team?? Innocent until proven guilty, right? These weren't minors that made a statement under duress by the police dept...these were grown men who admitted to doing wrong. They implicated themselves! Maybe you would have a point if they denied the accusations...but my ninja, they admitted to doing it. That's his fault, bruh!

I pray to God you don't have a daughter, homie. Some things are more important than sports.

can someone send me a link showing that Figs "admitted to the crime"

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap20...lb-alex-figueroa-kicked-off-team-after-arrest

 

[Rellyrell]

so now you a FSU fan or something?

No. I'm a UM law alum. I'm a prosecutor and was an assistant state attorney for about six years prior. Also did criminal defense for about three years.

Everyone could be anyone behind a computer, bruh. The fact is, the bum admitted to doing the crime, so why in the **** would he not be kicked off the team?? Innocent until proven guilty, right? These weren't minors that made a statement under duress by the police dept...these were grown men who admitted to doing wrong. They implicated themselves! Maybe you would have a point if they denied the accusations...but my ninja, they admitted to doing it. That's his fault, bruh!

I pray to God you don't have a daughter, homie. Some things are more important than sports.

can someone send me a link showing that Figs "admitted to the crime"

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap20...lb-alex-figueroa-kicked-off-team-after-arrest

it wasn't until they admitted to doing the crime as to when they were kicked off. funny how some of these idiots were bashing FSU for how they handled Winston, but now under the same breath they are defending two idiots because they dawned the orange ang green?? FOH!

 

[The Franchise]

You all need to stfu about drugging her and raping her and them admitting to that. Quotes or gtfo.

Even if she was drugged, prove they drugged her. Prove they knew she was drugged.
Prove she didn't consent bc that's their defense

Cot dam At the dumb mutha****as on here.

/ and at the []_[] who made the knee jerk decision to kick these kids out of school

so now you a FSU fan or something?

No. I'm a UM law alum. I'm a prosecutor and was an assistant state attorney for about six years prior. Also did criminal defense for about three years.

Everyone could be anyone behind a computer, bruh. The fact is, the bum admitted to doing the crime, so why in the **** would he not be kicked off the team?? Innocent until proven guilty, right? These weren't minors that made a statement under duress by the police dept...these were grown men who admitted to doing wrong. They implicated themselves! Maybe you would have a point if they denied the accusations...but my ninja, they admitted to doing it. That's his fault, bruh!

I pray to God you don't have a daughter, homie. Some things are more important than sports.

Let me help you. Let's start with the basics. Do you think that a police report is the final word in a criminal case? For instance, do you think that if a police report says "Rellyrell admitted to raping a goat at 1400 hours on December 12, 2014" that is absolute proof that Rellyrell raped a goat or that he admitted to raping a goat? If you deny having admitted that or having done that, do you think you have any recourse, or are you automatically guilty because the police report says you did it?

 

[Rellyrell]

You all need to stfu about drugging her and raping her and them admitting to that. Quotes or gtfo.

Even if she was drugged, prove they drugged her. Prove they knew she was drugged.
Prove she didn't consent bc that's their defense

Cot dam At the dumb mutha****as on here.

/ and at the []_[] who made the knee jerk decision to kick these kids out of school

so now you a FSU fan or something?

No. I'm a UM law alum. I'm a prosecutor and was an assistant state attorney for about six years prior. Also did criminal defense for about three years.

Everyone could be anyone behind a computer, bruh. The fact is, the bum admitted to doing the crime, so why in the **** would he not be kicked off the team?? Innocent until proven guilty, right? These weren't minors that made a statement under duress by the police dept...these were grown men who admitted to doing wrong. They implicated themselves! Maybe you would have a point if they denied the accusations...but my ninja, they admitted to doing it. That's his fault, bruh!

I pray to God you don't have a daughter, homie. Some things are more important than sports.

Let me help you. Let's start with the basics. Do you think that a police report is the final word in a criminal case? For instance, do you think that if a police report says "Rellyrell admitted to raping a goat at 1400 hours on December 12, 2014" that is absolute proof that Rellyrell raped a goat or that he admitted to raping a goat? If you deny having admitted that or having done that, do you think you have any recourse, or are you automatically guilty because the police report says you did it?

When I got popped, whether I did it or not, I said nothing. You are alleged to do something when you don't speak. That's why Winston was alleged to raping that chick and therefore he did no time w/o proof. The moment you snitch on yourself, that's when the report comes out that you admitted to doing the crime, even if you try to recant your statement later. If it was a false report, guess what? He has a great chance of a law suit against that police dept. The fact that there is no lawsuit would indicate that the report was accurate.

 

[TC7D]

I may have missed it somewhere in all of these extremely long posts, but what is the point of beating this dead horse? Are people really upset that this guy isn't on our roster right now?

 

[The Franchise]

so now you a FSU fan or something?

No. I'm a UM law alum. I'm a prosecutor and was an assistant state attorney for about six years prior. Also did criminal defense for about three years.

Everyone could be anyone behind a computer, bruh. The fact is, the bum admitted to doing the crime, so why in the **** would he not be kicked off the team?? Innocent until proven guilty, right? These weren't minors that made a statement under duress by the police dept...these were grown men who admitted to doing wrong. They implicated themselves! Maybe you would have a point if they denied the accusations...but my ninja, they admitted to doing it. That's his fault, bruh!

I pray to God you don't have a daughter, homie. Some things are more important than sports.

Let me help you. Let's start with the basics. Do you think that a police report is the final word in a criminal case? For instance, do you think that if a police report says "Rellyrell admitted to raping a goat at 1400 hours on December 12, 2014" that is absolute proof that Rellyrell raped a goat or that he admitted to raping a goat? If you deny having admitted that or having done that, do you think you have any recourse, or are you automatically guilty because the police report says you did it?

When I got popped, whether I did it or not, I said nothing. You are alleged to do something when you don't speak. That's why Winston was alleged to raping that chick and therefore he did no time w/o proof. The moment you snitch on yourself, that's when the report comes out that you admitted to doing the crime, even if you try to recant your statement later. If it was a false report, guess what? He has a great chance of a law suit against that police dept. The fact that there is no lawsuit would indicate that the report was accurate.

So because they weren't experienced criminals like you and talked to the cops that means they are automatically guilty of everything in the police report? Why do they bother with criminal trials if everything in the police report is taken as conclusive proof?

 

[Jassid82]

Man this thread is still going on? Lol. Figatron must be feeling like a God right now. He did jack **** while he was here but he caused yall to keep an 11 page thread alive solely on a topic regarding him. Man once the spring game is over on Sat it is going to get real pathetic around here..Whats next? Digging up Martin Patton from the 1991 UM squads police report and dissecting it for 20 pages? Smh.

 

[McGahee2TheHouse]

No. I'm a UM law alum. I'm a prosecutor and was an assistant state attorney for about six years prior. Also did criminal defense for about three years.

Everyone could be anyone behind a computer, bruh. The fact is, the bum admitted to doing the crime, so why in the **** would he not be kicked off the team?? Innocent until proven guilty, right? These weren't minors that made a statement under duress by the police dept...these were grown men who admitted to doing wrong. They implicated themselves! Maybe you would have a point if they denied the accusations...but my ninja, they admitted to doing it. That's his fault, bruh!

I pray to God you don't have a daughter, homie. Some things are more important than sports.

Let me help you. Let's start with the basics. Do you think that a police report is the final word in a criminal case? For instance, do you think that if a police report says "Rellyrell admitted to raping a goat at 1400 hours on December 12, 2014" that is absolute proof that Rellyrell raped a goat or that he admitted to raping a goat? If you deny having admitted that or having done that, do you think you have any recourse, or are you automatically guilty because the police report says you did it?

When I got popped, whether I did it or not, I said nothing. You are alleged to do something when you don't speak. That's why Winston was alleged to raping that chick and therefore he did no time w/o proof. The moment you snitch on yourself, that's when the report comes out that you admitted to doing the crime, even if you try to recant your statement later. If it was a false report, guess what? He has a great chance of a law suit against that police dept. The fact that there is no lawsuit would indicate that the report was accurate.

So because they weren't experienced criminals like you and talked to the cops that means they are automatically guilty of everything in the police report? Why do they bother with criminal trials if everything in the police report is taken as conclusive proof?

Why can't police reports be used substantively as evidence at trial?

I'll give 1000 internets to the Google Lawyer who can answer that correctly.

 

[ABear]

Everyone could be anyone behind a computer, bruh. The fact is, the bum admitted to doing the crime, so why in the **** would he not be kicked off the team?? Innocent until proven guilty, right? These weren't minors that made a statement under duress by the police dept...these were grown men who admitted to doing wrong. They implicated themselves! Maybe you would have a point if they denied the accusations...but my ninja, they admitted to doing it. That's his fault, bruh!

I pray to God you don't have a daughter, homie. Some things are more important than sports.

Let me help you. Let's start with the basics. Do you think that a police report is the final word in a criminal case? For instance, do you think that if a police report says "Rellyrell admitted to raping a goat at 1400 hours on December 12, 2014" that is absolute proof that Rellyrell raped a goat or that he admitted to raping a goat? If you deny having admitted that or having done that, do you think you have any recourse, or are you automatically guilty because the police report says you did it?

When I got popped, whether I did it or not, I said nothing. You are alleged to do something when you don't speak. That's why Winston was alleged to raping that chick and therefore he did no time w/o proof. The moment you snitch on yourself, that's when the report comes out that you admitted to doing the crime, even if you try to recant your statement later. If it was a false report, guess what? He has a great chance of a law suit against that police dept. The fact that there is no lawsuit would indicate that the report was accurate.

So because they weren't experienced criminals like you and talked to the cops that means they are automatically guilty of everything in the police report? Why do they bother with criminal trials if everything in the police report is taken as conclusive proof?

Why can't police reports be used substantively as evidence at trial?

I'll give 1000 internets to the Google Lawyer who can answer that correctly.

Because Police Reports are used to justify the arrest ... not the prosecution of the crime.

You can't just take a police report at face value. As most cops are power hungry ***gots.

 

[The Franchise]

Everyone could be anyone behind a computer, bruh. The fact is, the bum admitted to doing the crime, so why in the **** would he not be kicked off the team?? Innocent until proven guilty, right? These weren't minors that made a statement under duress by the police dept...these were grown men who admitted to doing wrong. They implicated themselves! Maybe you would have a point if they denied the accusations...but my ninja, they admitted to doing it. That's his fault, bruh!

I pray to God you don't have a daughter, homie. Some things are more important than sports.

Let me help you. Let's start with the basics. Do you think that a police report is the final word in a criminal case? For instance, do you think that if a police report says "Rellyrell admitted to raping a goat at 1400 hours on December 12, 2014" that is absolute proof that Rellyrell raped a goat or that he admitted to raping a goat? If you deny having admitted that or having done that, do you think you have any recourse, or are you automatically guilty because the police report says you did it?

When I got popped, whether I did it or not, I said nothing. You are alleged to do something when you don't speak. That's why Winston was alleged to raping that chick and therefore he did no time w/o proof. The moment you snitch on yourself, that's when the report comes out that you admitted to doing the crime, even if you try to recant your statement later. If it was a false report, guess what? He has a great chance of a law suit against that police dept. The fact that there is no lawsuit would indicate that the report was accurate.

So because they weren't experienced criminals like you and talked to the cops that means they are automatically guilty of everything in the police report? Why do they bother with criminal trials if everything in the police report is taken as conclusive proof?

Why can't police reports be used substantively as evidence at trial?

I'll give 1000 internets to the Google Lawyer who can answer that correctly.

Where's db, the heralded Google Lawyer, to pontificate on this? I'm anxiously awaiting his ruling.

 

[MIA42178]

You all need to stfu about drugging her and raping her and them admitting to that. Quotes or gtfo.

Even if she was drugged, prove they drugged her. Prove they knew she was drugged.
Prove she didn't consent bc that's their defense

Cot dam At the dumb mutha****as on here.

/ and at the []_[] who made the knee jerk decision to kick these kids out of school

so now you a FSU fan or something?

No. I'm a UM law alum. I'm a prosecutor and was an assistant state attorney for about six years prior. Also did criminal defense for about three years.

Why even bother with these frogs? They don't realize that part of the problem with this program is that we treat our kids like garbage.

Same aholes claiming not attending games = not supporting players. Which is Bullsht. It seems more that they mean
Not attending games = not supporting Alfraud and this sht administration.

If UM had not jumped to conclusions and merely suspended them until resolved, I'm certain we wouldn't read some of the near baseless accusations being tossed around

 

[Rellyrell]

No. I'm a UM law alum. I'm a prosecutor and was an assistant state attorney for about six years prior. Also did criminal defense for about three years.

Everyone could be anyone behind a computer, bruh. The fact is, the bum admitted to doing the crime, so why in the **** would he not be kicked off the team?? Innocent until proven guilty, right? These weren't minors that made a statement under duress by the police dept...these were grown men who admitted to doing wrong. They implicated themselves! Maybe you would have a point if they denied the accusations...but my ninja, they admitted to doing it. That's his fault, bruh!

I pray to God you don't have a daughter, homie. Some things are more important than sports.

Let me help you. Let's start with the basics. Do you think that a police report is the final word in a criminal case? For instance, do you think that if a police report says "Rellyrell admitted to raping a goat at 1400 hours on December 12, 2014" that is absolute proof that Rellyrell raped a goat or that he admitted to raping a goat? If you deny having admitted that or having done that, do you think you have any recourse, or are you automatically guilty because the police report says you did it?

When I got popped, whether I did it or not, I said nothing. You are alleged to do something when you don't speak. That's why Winston was alleged to raping that chick and therefore he did no time w/o proof. The moment you snitch on yourself, that's when the report comes out that you admitted to doing the crime, even if you try to recant your statement later. If it was a false report, guess what? He has a great chance of a law suit against that police dept. The fact that there is no lawsuit would indicate that the report was accurate.

So because they weren't experienced criminals like you and talked to the cops that means they are automatically guilty of everything in the police report? Why do they bother with criminal trials if everything in the police report is taken as conclusive proof?

first off, idiot, the whole point was them being kicked off the team. wtf does going to trial and all that bull have to do numbnuts, like yourself, doing something stupid. neither one of them deserves to be on this football team. you're probably the same tramp that thinks that darren sharper is innocent too b/c he played for your favorite football team, huh? foh.

 

[Peachycarnahan]

Everyone could be anyone behind a computer, bruh. The fact is, the bum admitted to doing the crime, so why in the **** would he not be kicked off the team?? Innocent until proven guilty, right? These weren't minors that made a statement under duress by the police dept...these were grown men who admitted to doing wrong. They implicated themselves! Maybe you would have a point if they denied the accusations...but my ninja, they admitted to doing it. That's his fault, bruh!

I pray to God you don't have a daughter, homie. Some things are more important than sports.

Let me help you. Let's start with the basics. Do you think that a police report is the final word in a criminal case? For instance, do you think that if a police report says "Rellyrell admitted to raping a goat at 1400 hours on December 12, 2014" that is absolute proof that Rellyrell raped a goat or that he admitted to raping a goat? If you deny having admitted that or having done that, do you think you have any recourse, or are you automatically guilty because the police report says you did it?

When I got popped, whether I did it or not, I said nothing. You are alleged to do something when you don't speak. That's why Winston was alleged to raping that chick and therefore he did no time w/o proof. The moment you snitch on yourself, that's when the report comes out that you admitted to doing the crime, even if you try to recant your statement later. If it was a false report, guess what? He has a great chance of a law suit against that police dept. The fact that there is no lawsuit would indicate that the report was accurate.

So because they weren't experienced criminals like you and talked to the cops that means they are automatically guilty of everything in the police report? Why do they bother with criminal trials if everything in the police report is taken as conclusive proof?

Why can't police reports be used substantively as evidence at trial?

I'll give 1000 internets to the Google Lawyer who can answer that correctly.

police rpoerts are hearsay not entitled to the business reocrd exception of Rule 803

 

[McGahee2TheHouse]

Let me help you. Let's start with the basics. Do you think that a police report is the final word in a criminal case? For instance, do you think that if a police report says "Rellyrell admitted to raping a goat at 1400 hours on December 12, 2014" that is absolute proof that Rellyrell raped a goat or that he admitted to raping a goat? If you deny having admitted that or having done that, do you think you have any recourse, or are you automatically guilty because the police report says you did it?

When I got popped, whether I did it or not, I said nothing. You are alleged to do something when you don't speak. That's why Winston was alleged to raping that chick and therefore he did no time w/o proof. The moment you snitch on yourself, that's when the report comes out that you admitted to doing the crime, even if you try to recant your statement later. If it was a false report, guess what? He has a great chance of a law suit against that police dept. The fact that there is no lawsuit would indicate that the report was accurate.

So because they weren't experienced criminals like you and talked to the cops that means they are automatically guilty of everything in the police report? Why do they bother with criminal trials if everything in the police report is taken as conclusive proof?

Why can't police reports be used substantively as evidence at trial?

I'll give 1000 internets to the Google Lawyer who can answer that correctly.

police rpoerts are hearsay not entitled to the business reocrd exception of Rule 803

You will need to answer the question more fully in order to win the prize.

 

[ABear]

When I got popped, whether I did it or not, I said nothing. You are alleged to do something when you don't speak. That's why Winston was alleged to raping that chick and therefore he did no time w/o proof. The moment you snitch on yourself, that's when the report comes out that you admitted to doing the crime, even if you try to recant your statement later. If it was a false report, guess what? He has a great chance of a law suit against that police dept. The fact that there is no lawsuit would indicate that the report was accurate.

So because they weren't experienced criminals like you and talked to the cops that means they are automatically guilty of everything in the police report? Why do they bother with criminal trials if everything in the police report is taken as conclusive proof?

Why can't police reports be used substantively as evidence at trial?

I'll give 1000 internets to the Google Lawyer who can answer that correctly.

police rpoerts are hearsay not entitled to the business reocrd exception of Rule 803

You will need to answer the question more fully in order to win the prize.

ya, he has given us the technical reason. the technical reason is probably not the best explanation for lay folks on a message board

 

[McGahee2TheHouse]

So because they weren't experienced criminals like you and talked to the cops that means they are automatically guilty of everything in the police report? Why do they bother with criminal trials if everything in the police report is taken as conclusive proof?

Why can't police reports be used substantively as evidence at trial?

I'll give 1000 internets to the Google Lawyer who can answer that correctly.

police rpoerts are hearsay not entitled to the business reocrd exception of Rule 803

You will need to answer the question more fully in order to win the prize.

ya, he has given us the technical reason. the technical reason is probably not the best explanation for lay folks on a message board

Yeah, we need the policy, not the rule.