CaneSince4Ever
Senior
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2012
- Messages
- 7,003
sorta.
Either way it's just another loophole for the Alabum@$$es, Clemdumps, & USheA's of the world to exploit:
"A judge ruled against the NCAA on Friday night in a federal antitrust lawsuit, saying football and basketball players should be permitted to receive more compensation from schools but only if the benefits are tied to education.
The ruling Friday night from U.S. District Judge Claudia Wilken in Oakland, California, said the NCAA cannot "limit compensation or benefits related to education." That means more scholarship money to pursue postgraduate degrees or finish undergraduate degrees and items that could be considered school supplies such as computers."
Either way it's just another loophole for the Alabum@$$es, Clemdumps, & USheA's of the world to exploit:
"A judge ruled against the NCAA on Friday night in a federal antitrust lawsuit, saying football and basketball players should be permitted to receive more compensation from schools but only if the benefits are tied to education.
The ruling Friday night from U.S. District Judge Claudia Wilken in Oakland, California, said the NCAA cannot "limit compensation or benefits related to education." That means more scholarship money to pursue postgraduate degrees or finish undergraduate degrees and items that could be considered school supplies such as computers."
Judge rules against NCAA in antitrust lawsuit
A judge has ruled against the NCAA, saying football and basketball players should be allowed to receive more compensation from schools but only if the benefits are related to education.
www.espn.com