- Joined
- Jun 3, 2012
- Messages
- 10,354
Dan Lanning went to Columbus, too?Dan Lanning at a B+ rubs salt in the wound
Dan Lanning went to Columbus, too?Dan Lanning at a B+ rubs salt in the wound
no one is ignoring that but its bc of the scheme of the coaches that we struggled early on offensively and basically had our QB looking like he forgot how to play.Mario has made mistakes, it’s pretty obvious. But it blows my mind how many people on here just want to ignore how much our guys mess up because that destroys the 110% corch narrative.
I mean its a midseason grade. it would be incomplete if they said final grade no? through half the year this is what their grade is lol.Midseason grades for 1st year HCs? Shouldn't it be "Incomplete" for all of them. More knee-jerk reactions for clicks by "the flagship"...
I mean its a midseason grade. it would be incomplete if they said final grade no? through half the year this is what their grade is lol.
its click bait - I agree. its just fodder for the website to justify their ESPN plus sub price. to that end, it worked. we have a thread on here about itYou might be right, but then again, you might also be proving my greater point... a midseason grade for a 1st year HC is about as pointless and worthless as can be. Midseason anything is worthless, but it's especially worthless when the HC hasn't even had the benefit of a single full recruiting cycle.
He was suppose to correct that to a point they didn't embarrasse themselves.It didn’t mention how many dropped passes missed tackles fumbles interceptions and missed field goals Mario had.
Mario deserves a Phase 2 grade if we're going by Columbus standards.Dan Lanning went to Columbus, too?
Wins or losses on saturdays are importantIf you factor in recruiting (which is the single most important aspect of a coach's performance in CFB), the grade should be much higher.
A D+ is a passing grade ?While I’m still holding out hope that Mario will turn out to be “the guy”, I have to say that giving him a D+ is being very, very generous. D+ is a passing grade and he clearly deserves a failing grade (E) so far this season. While I think we all agree that Manny was not capable of turning things around, I’m pretty sure if he were the coach this year, we would have a 3-3 record at the worst, and likely a 4-2. record. Gotta call it like it is.
Stop grading on a curve. Mario has sucked. I'd give him a F-It didn’t mention how many dropped passes missed tackles fumbles interceptions and missed field goals Mario had.
I can’t wrap my mind around it, honestly.
And that’s recognizing we suck, and have sucked for a long time. But looking at results from their other games this season, **** is beyond crazy. How could it go down like that?’
Even if they had the best MTSU team ever and were demolishing the rest of their schedule, an L would be suspect. But this MTSU team??
I don‘t care about the coach, personnel, weather, wet bulb phase, whatever….I’ll never understand.
Agreed. If the team was 3-3 but the coaches had the right scheme all along.....i could live with that. Making pretty obvious errors and taking forever to START to correct those errors is what I have a problem with.no one is ignoring that but its bc of the scheme of the coaches that we struggled early on offensively and basically had our QB looking like he forgot how to play.
I respectfully disagree. I do agree that Mario hasn’t done himself any favors and he may even have a failing grade right now but I am pretty sure that Manny wouldn’t have done any better this year record wise then Mario.While I’m still holding out hope that Mario will turn out to be “the guy”, I have to say that giving him a D+ is being very, very generous. D+ is a passing grade and he clearly deserves a failing grade (E) so far this season. While I think we all agree that Manny was not capable of turning things around, I’m pretty sure if he were the coach this year, we would have a 3-3 record at the worst, and likely a 4-2. record. Gotta call it like it is.
Throughout the course of a game there will be dropped passes, missed tackles, fumbles, interceptions etc. A player or two having these issues every now and again is a part of the game. HOWEVER, when multiple players from multiple position groups consistently have multiple issues, then that absolutely points to bad coaching/improper teaching of technique. Those issues fall on the position coaches, which in turn falls onto the coordinators, which ultimately reflects on the head man in charge. If you're head of the sales department at a company and you have a couple of employees who routinely miss sales targets/goals then you institute a performance improvement plan to help remedy their issues. If they continue to miss the mark then you will end up replacing those workers with better, more qualified candidates who can meet goals. But, if the entire sales department routinely misses monthly, quarterly, even annual goals, then the higher ups will most definitely replace the head of sales before cleaning out the entire department. So yes, multiple miscues over multiple games falls back in Mario. Singling out players is ignoring a much larger issue at hand.It didn’t mention how many dropped passes missed tackles fumbles interceptions and missed field goals Mario had.
No losing to MTSU should’ve gave him an F be happ with a DMidseason grades for 1st year HCs? Shouldn't it be "Incomplete" for all of them. More knee-jerk reactions for clicks by "the flagship"...