DT Freddie Booth-Lloyd shows off his speed

Advertisement
Joe Brown doe

What does Joe Brown have to do with this?

I'm not a big fan of using a spot on him. I would have even taken this guy over him. I know they are different positions but DT is the worst position we have, and with a lack of local talent this year, I would have preferred a spot for Joe Brown to go to Cerenord or this guy.

Just a joke though. Clearly this kid is an athlete, I did not expect that speed.
 
Joe Brown doe

What does Joe Brown have to do with this?

I'm not a big fan of using a spot on him. I would have even taken this guy over him. I know they are different positions but DT is the worst position we have, and with a lack of local talent this year, I would have preferred a spot for Joe Brown to go to Cerenord or this guy.

Just a joke though. Clearly this kid is an athlete, I did not expect that speed.

We signed 4 DTs, and had 4 OL until Gibbons flipped. They obviously wanted someone to replace Gibbons and felt good with 4 DTs. If you don't like him as an OL, then fine (not sure how that could be determined though), but saying we shouldn't replace Gibbons and take a 5th DT instead messes up the numbers they want.
 
Joe Brown doe

What does Joe Brown have to do with this?

I'm not a big fan of using a spot on him. I would have even taken this guy over him. I know they are different positions but DT is the worst position we have, and with a lack of local talent this year, I would have preferred a spot for Joe Brown to go to Cerenord or this guy.

Just a joke though. Clearly this kid is an athlete, I did not expect that speed.

We signed 4 DTs, and had 4 OL until Gibbons flipped. They obviously wanted someone to replace Gibbons and felt good with 4 DTs. If you don't like him as an OL, then fine (not sure how that could be determined though), but saying we shouldn't replace Gibbons and take a 5th DT instead messes up the numbers they want.

How would it mess up the number if we were ready to take more than 5? We were ready to take at least 5 DTs when Valentine was still committed. When he de-committed, we still went after him as well as other DT's, despite expecting at least 4.
 
Other than flaming the board by a Gaytor, what's the point of this thread?
 
Advertisement
Other than flaming the board by a Gaytor, what's the point of this thread?

120.gif
 
Advertisement
Joe Brown doe

What does Joe Brown have to do with this?

I'm not a big fan of using a spot on him. I would have even taken this guy over him. I know they are different positions but DT is the worst position we have, and with a lack of local talent this year, I would have preferred a spot for Joe Brown to go to Cerenord or this guy.

Just a joke though. Clearly this kid is an athlete, I did not expect that speed.

We signed 4 DTs, and had 4 OL until Gibbons flipped. They obviously wanted someone to replace Gibbons and felt good with 4 DTs. If you don't like him as an OL, then fine (not sure how that could be determined though), but saying we shouldn't replace Gibbons and take a 5th DT instead messes up the numbers they want.

How would it mess up the number if we were ready to take more than 5? We were ready to take at least 5 DTs when Valentine was still committed. When he de-committed, we still went after him as well as other DT's, despite expecting at least 4.

Exactly. The way I see it is we did awesome with the O Line. We may not have quantity but we have quality. At DT we have neither.
 
We Can't get FBL at this point but here is a kid UM should offer for the 2015 class that we could have a shot that is bigger and faster.

[video=youtube_share;1gZ1wNHtK2c]http://youtu.be/1gZ1wNHtK2c[/video]
 
Back
Top