forums

Donofrio to Purdue? Lol

He doesn't deserve a job ever again in his life. Thinking he's the smartest person in the room, never changing, costing kids millions. Any place that hires him deserves the resulting mediocrity.
 
Advertisement
Good! I can watch michigan state put up 50 every year. Too bad rutgers passed on folden or id get to see him be embarrassed as well.
 
This has nothing to do with the emotional trauma that this guy put me through, but why would anyone consider him for a job? His defenses were in the bottom 10 or so every year since he installed his system.
 
Again, this is what happens when the HC is in a death spiral. He is left with no one to hire except losers.

Happens every time a death spiral HC like Hazel fires assistants and has to scramble to replace them with losers like Melvin and donofrio who have no other options.
 
If he was D' Vontre Washington he would not be considered as an assistant never alone a DC with his track record. Man I gotta get a white guy transplant.
 
Advertisement
Gator Hatar said:
If he was D' Vontre Washington he would not be considered as an assistant never alone a DC with his track record. Man I gotta get a white guy transplant.
Click to expand...

Wait one, Paul Williams got a job already. Coaching good ole boy thing goes beyond race these days. Incompetents of any race get rehired and rehired. Well except Butch, I guess he is done. There you go, that's one white boy that can't get back in.
 
MedleyCane said:
Era66 said:
TooColdToHold said:
In fairness, his system is much more suited for a slow Big 10 team. He might do ok there.
Click to expand...
You beat me to it. His style is good for teams that have lesser athletic talent than other teams.
Click to expand...

WTF does that mean?
Click to expand...

It means that they think he's a superior coach because those are the only coaches who do well with lesser talent than other teams.

How about this: He stinks. Why do guys feel the need to assume he's good just because he has the job? He had decent results at Temple because Folden managed to recruit talent that was better than most of the MAC teams they played. He didn't have decent results there because he magically coaches up inferior talent to overactive.
 
The Franchise said:
MedleyCane said:
Era66 said:
TooColdToHold said:
In fairness, his system is much more suited for a slow Big 10 team. He might do ok there.
Click to expand...
You beat me to it. His style is good for teams that have lesser athletic talent than other teams.
Click to expand...

WTF does that mean?
Click to expand...

It means that they think he's a superior coach because those are the only coaches who do well with lesser talent than other teams.

How about this: He stinks. Why do guys feel the need to assume he's good just because he has the job? He had decent results at Temple because Folden managed to recruit talent that was better than most of the MAC teams they played. He didn't have decent results there because he magically coaches up inferior talent to overactive.
Click to expand...
I am not a defender of Doritos, the guy trys to fit a square peg into a round hole. A great DC changes his style to the athletes his has.
 
Last edited:
Advertisement
Era66 said:
MedleyCane said:
Era66 said:
TooColdToHold said:
In fairness, his system is much more suited for a slow Big 10 team. He might do ok there.
Click to expand...
You beat me to it. His style is good for teams that have lesser athletic talent than other teams.
Click to expand...

WTF does that mean?
Click to expand...
Purdues of the worlds are playing against teams with better athletes, just like Temple. No D's style is made to force teams to drive the length of the field.
Click to expand...

WTF does that mean?
 
Back
Top