DONNA SHALALA just got new job

[Gatorhater]

She leaves the University in diminishing returns from her operations here. And with all that connection to a former Prez of these States United in America, she could NOT get the University free from the NCAA as the folks in PA got Ped State U. Heck, the BlTCH should have been fired for breach of her fiduciary responsibities when she refused to appeal the additional NCAA sanctions.

Considering that virtually nothing is trending up at the University, she got that new gig probably without getting permission, and her coziness with Nevin Shapiro, she should be asked to leave by the end of Spring Break for a clean break.

I'd go little father and say she should be sued for return of all monies paid to her. Her part in the nevin scandal should have gotten her fired then. The one picture was enough. All she ever did was con people out of donations and then massively overspend on acquisitions to build a future bankruptcy for UHealth.

 

[paksat]

im glad to see two crooks getting together, maybe that way they'll both burn at the same time

 

[Cane Dynasty]

She's the perfect fit for the Clinton Foundation. A hugely crooked organization is a natural fit for her. Not surprised by this in the least.

Why is the Clinton foundations hugely crooked?

Seriously? Two disbarred attorneys who spent lifetime in politics start something. What else could it be? They stole the china from the Whitehouse when Bill left office. Leopards do not change their spots. Some things you can just take on faith.

Clintons Began Taking White House Property a Year Ago
http://articles.latimes.com/2001/feb/10/news/mn-23723

 

[Cane2]

She leaves the University in diminishing returns from her operations here. And with all that connection to a former Prez of these States United in America, she could NOT get the University free from the NCAA as the folks in PA got Ped State U. Heck, the BlTCH should have been fired for breach of her fiduciary responsibities when she refused to appeal the additional NCAA sanctions.

Considering that virtually nothing is trending up at the University, she got that new gig probably without getting permission, and her coziness with Nevin Shapiro, she should be asked to leave by the end of Spring Break for a clean break.

I'd go little father and say she should be sued for return of all monies paid to her. Her part in the nevin scandal should have gotten her fired then. The one picture was enough. All she ever did was con people out of donations and then massively overspend on acquisitions to build a future bankruptcy for UHealth.

She will be perfect for running that Clinton Foundation then. She would reach out to Arab countries where her origins are while hitting all of UM donors who would want quid pro quo in influence & opportunities. Between these 2 groups alone she'll raise billions while jet setting the Clintons and herself. I'd guarantee it she'll raise funds for the Clinton that will pace the marriage-equality-supporting Koch Brothers spending, if not outright outpace these Koch boys. 4 years from office Bill Clinton earned over $100,000,000, Shalala will match that by a full fifth by the time she'd be done & retired running with that foundation. Ain't nothing gonna stop that BlTCH now on her way to greener pastures.

Therefore, it shouldn't be hard coaxing that BlTCH to leave UM in weeks, if not days. With Hillary's campaign heating up and in need of much damage control after running our State Dept like her own feudal state as in answering to none and subsequently governing a separate State within another State, Donna is more needed to Hillary to start at Foundation immediately than to leave UM prompt-o.

Either some pizzas to her palace and or divert all the Fire Golden efforts to Prez Shalala whose corrupted & misguided leadership has been and IS now leading UM to clearly diminishing returns.

 

[MelBeachCane]

March 11, 2015
New head of Clinton Foundation tried to suppress campus conservative group
By Thomas Lifson
There’s no danger that the tax subsidy granted to donors to the Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton Foundation will be used to benefit conservatives. Not if the new president of the 2 billion dollar slush fund foundation has anything to say about it. The Daily Caller reports:
The outgoing University of Miami president tapped to head the Clinton Foundation once tried to block a conservative group founded by four female students from organizing on campus.
Donna Shalala, who also served as former President Bill Clinton’s Secretary of Health and Human Services, was recently hand-picked to take over as CEO of the Bill, Hillary, and Chelsea Clinton Foundation, a non-profit dedicated to global health and to improving health and wellness for women and girls.
It was the 2002-2003 school year when Shalala and her university administration rejected an upstart group, Advocates for Conservative Thought, on the grounds that it would be redundant since the school already had a College Republicans chapter. (snip)
Shalala’s administration rejected the group three times — in November and December of 2002 and in January 2003. ACT pushed back against the school’s argument that it would be redundant, pointing out that College Republicans endorse a specific party and specific candidates. Some of ACT’s founders were registered Democrats who advocated for conservative values, they argued.
Shalala’s reasoning was a pretty thin excuse, and it did not survive scrutiny:
[The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education – FIRE] pointed out that the University of Miami hosted a number of organizations with shared values. The school had multiple Muslim groups, a number of groups for black students, multiple groups for Asian and Hispanic students and a couple for environmentalists.
FIRE sent a letter to Shalala on April 7, 2003, and received response that a policy change was “under consideration.” But COSO followed up with its decision weeks later, informing the group that it would not be approved but could apply again the following semester. No guarantees were provided.
That response generated outrage and national media coverage.
Under growing pressure, Shalala finally caved and called for a reversal of the policy.
I think it is fair to suppose that in her new job, Shalala will push the limits, Clinton style, in rationalizing political activities as worthy of tax subsidy. Her bias is obvious, and her willingness to serve as a tool of the Clintons is unquestioned. A perfect fit, you might say.
Hat tip: Instapundit
There’s no danger that the tax subsidy granted to donors to the Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton Foundation will be used to benefit conservatives. Not if the new president of the 2 billion dollar slush fund foundation has anything to say about it. The Daily Caller reports:
The outgoing University of Miami president tapped to head the Clinton Foundation once tried to block a conservative group founded by four female students from organizing on campus.
Donna Shalala, who also served as former President Bill Clinton’s Secretary of Health and Human Services, was recently hand-picked to take over as CEO of the Bill, Hillary, and Chelsea Clinton Foundation, a non-profit dedicated to global health and to improving health and wellness for women and girls.
It was the 2002-2003 school year when Shalala and her university administration rejected an upstart group, Advocates for Conservative Thought, on the grounds that it would be redundant since the school already had a College Republicans chapter. (snip)
Shalala’s administration rejected the group three times — in November and December of 2002 and in January 2003. ACT pushed back against the school’s argument that it would be redundant, pointing out that College Republicans endorse a specific party and specific candidates. Some of ACT’s founders were registered Democrats who advocated for conservative values, they argued.
Shalala’s reasoning was a pretty thin excuse, and it did not survive scrutiny:
[The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education – FIRE] pointed out that the University of Miami hosted a number of organizations with shared values. The school had multiple Muslim groups, a number of groups for black students, multiple groups for Asian and Hispanic students and a couple for environmentalists.
FIRE sent a letter to Shalala on April 7, 2003, and received response that a policy change was “under consideration.” But COSO followed up with its decision weeks later, informing the group that it would not be approved but could apply again the following semester. No guarantees were provided.
That response generated outrage and national media coverage.
Under growing pressure, Shalala finally caved and called for a reversal of the policy.
I think it is fair to suppose that in her new job, Shalala will push the limits, Clinton style, in rationalizing political activities as worthy of tax subsidy. Her bias is obvious, and her willingness to serve as a tool of the Clintons is unquestioned. A perfect fit, you might say.
Hat tip: Instapundit

 

[canebrake]

There was nno such "word on the hill." Where did you come up with that bull****?

 

[CaneInHeelCountry]

March 11, 2015
New head of Clinton Foundation tried to suppress campus conservative group
By Thomas Lifson
There’s no danger that the tax subsidy granted to donors to the Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton Foundation will be used to benefit conservatives. Not if the new president of the 2 billion dollar slush fund foundation has anything to say about it. The Daily Caller reports:
The outgoing University of Miami president tapped to head the Clinton Foundation once tried to block a conservative group founded by four female students from organizing on campus.
Donna Shalala, who also served as former President Bill Clinton’s Secretary of Health and Human Services, was recently hand-picked to take over as CEO of the Bill, Hillary, and Chelsea Clinton Foundation, a non-profit dedicated to global health and to improving health and wellness for women and girls.
It was the 2002-2003 school year when Shalala and her university administration rejected an upstart group, Advocates for Conservative Thought, on the grounds that it would be redundant since the school already had a College Republicans chapter. (snip)
Shalala’s administration rejected the group three times — in November and December of 2002 and in January 2003. ACT pushed back against the school’s argument that it would be redundant, pointing out that College Republicans endorse a specific party and specific candidates. Some of ACT’s founders were registered Democrats who advocated for conservative values, they argued.
Shalala’s reasoning was a pretty thin excuse, and it did not survive scrutiny:
[The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education – FIRE] pointed out that the University of Miami hosted a number of organizations with shared values. The school had multiple Muslim groups, a number of groups for black students, multiple groups for Asian and Hispanic students and a couple for environmentalists.
FIRE sent a letter to Shalala on April 7, 2003, and received response that a policy change was “under consideration.” But COSO followed up with its decision weeks later, informing the group that it would not be approved but could apply again the following semester. No guarantees were provided.
That response generated outrage and national media coverage.
Under growing pressure, Shalala finally caved and called for a reversal of the policy.
I think it is fair to suppose that in her new job, Shalala will push the limits, Clinton style, in rationalizing political activities as worthy of tax subsidy. Her bias is obvious, and her willingness to serve as a tool of the Clintons is unquestioned. A perfect fit, you might say.
Hat tip: Instapundit
There’s no danger that the tax subsidy granted to donors to the Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton Foundation will be used to benefit conservatives. Not if the new president of the 2 billion dollar slush fund foundation has anything to say about it. The Daily Caller reports:
The outgoing University of Miami president tapped to head the Clinton Foundation once tried to block a conservative group founded by four female students from organizing on campus.
Donna Shalala, who also served as former President Bill Clinton’s Secretary of Health and Human Services, was recently hand-picked to take over as CEO of the Bill, Hillary, and Chelsea Clinton Foundation, a non-profit dedicated to global health and to improving health and wellness for women and girls.
It was the 2002-2003 school year when Shalala and her university administration rejected an upstart group, Advocates for Conservative Thought, on the grounds that it would be redundant since the school already had a College Republicans chapter. (snip)
Shalala’s administration rejected the group three times — in November and December of 2002 and in January 2003. ACT pushed back against the school’s argument that it would be redundant, pointing out that College Republicans endorse a specific party and specific candidates. Some of ACT’s founders were registered Democrats who advocated for conservative values, they argued.
Shalala’s reasoning was a pretty thin excuse, and it did not survive scrutiny:
[The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education – FIRE] pointed out that the University of Miami hosted a number of organizations with shared values. The school had multiple Muslim groups, a number of groups for black students, multiple groups for Asian and Hispanic students and a couple for environmentalists.
FIRE sent a letter to Shalala on April 7, 2003, and received response that a policy change was “under consideration.” But COSO followed up with its decision weeks later, informing the group that it would not be approved but could apply again the following semester. No guarantees were provided.
That response generated outrage and national media coverage.
Under growing pressure, Shalala finally caved and called for a reversal of the policy.
I think it is fair to suppose that in her new job, Shalala will push the limits, Clinton style, in rationalizing political activities as worthy of tax subsidy. Her bias is obvious, and her willingness to serve as a tool of the Clintons is unquestioned. A perfect fit, you might say.
Hat tip: Instapundit

Basically, all this says is that the STUDENT COMMITTEE in charge of deciding these things said that this conservative org was redundant and would not be recognized as a separate student organization. The members of the conservative org petitioned, and Shalala intervened and changed the policy.

Conservatives blow this up to "SHALALA'S ADMINISTRATION SUPPRESSES CONSERVATIVE GROUP."

Sad what has become of political discourse.

 

[BALLHAWKU]

I was hoping she was going to play the political game so they can throw up all her dirt . How she lost millions in the pharmacy or how she had her in nevin pockets to help pay for her spending issues

 

[JgDaCane]

when is she finally leaving?

 

[UMFarArcher]

when is she finally leaving?

That IS the question, isn't it?

 

[Cane Dynasty]

She checked out.

Still collecting paychecks though. Just like someone else we know.

 

[Dingaan1828]

She checked out.

Still collecting paychecks though. Just like someone else we know.

Working at UM sounds like a great gig.

 

[Klamalama]

She checked out.

Still collecting paychecks though. Just like someone else we know.

Working at UM sounds like a great gig.

That's why we're able to attract primo coaches like Wonderful Al Golden, and his glorious top-notch staff.

 

[Cane2]

She checked out.

Still collecting paychecks though. Just like someone else we know.

Working at UM sounds like a great gig.

In some Institutions of Learning -- not necessarily of Higher Learning -- when the Head Honcho in Charge of the learning institution announces that she is leaving/retiring effective a given date down the line, the big time stakeholders tell the retiring school CEO to pack it in now before hiring the next Education CEO.

Then, they bring in an outside old former school CEO who had already ran such institution to run the place for an interim period; former Honcho would declare that she/he would not be a candidate. This way, stakeholders do a full review and inventory of academia and all operations of accounting and finances. This interim period allow stakeholders to KNOW who or what type of leader they would need to hire.

In UM case, such new Interim prez would run the school while others (accounting firm, etc.) are analyzing the cash cows of the University, costs analysis of operations, where the U is bleeding money, in addition to where the U could make more money or maximize profits. Simply reviewing the cheap investment that UM make in its Coaches, Professors, could yield that such cheat investment yielded a poor return, and they may come to an analysis that doubling such investment would have quadruple the returns to the University and would have made the U far more attractive to customers (students) and the very best customers (students). And better students may also attract the best professors and scientists. Or they may realize that the cheap frugal investments in its coaches yielded good money from TV revenues, and were with little risks. (ok, such analysis could go the way stakeholders envision, or not.)

Moreover, all the non-pure academic affairs of the University, such as UHealth, could be reviewed and keen analysis done to cut waste, possibly to sell off non-profitable ventures, and improve profits (i.e., Football & Basketball gate receipts and overall revenues)

The rationale for such interim period [without the previous head honcho/a around things during her announced departure period ] is Head Honcho/a would not be able to influence the incoming next honcho to overlook her weaknesses in overall operations nor have him be positively inclined (positively prejudicial) to look the other way if abuses were uncovered. One thing for such model of CEO departure is that current CEO would not have a hand in influencing/picking her own replacement.

The stakeholders get to find out explicitly what are the weaknesses and strengths of the institution, i.e., of the University of Miami, free of internal influence or a potential conflict of interest since a current Honcho/a may want her history of operations and legacy to be seen as favorable as possible, i.e., not firing/divesting or undoing key investment/s even as it is universally sees that such investments has poor returns. Conflict of interest: current Honcho/a want to ride out bad investment while praying/hoping that bad investment could correct itself...or such bad investment would have to be divested by the next Honcho/a. The benefit for such interim period is that Honcho/Nero would not be able to watch the operation to burn slowly until she is gone or until the fire produces a phenom of Phenix.