I keep seeing the media saying "Miami is Back". There seem to be a lot of different idea's of what "Back" means.
To me I believe Traditionally "Back" meant in the national title conversation. To be in that convo we needed to finish with 1 loss or less and top 4 sometimes top 5-6. We played for 10 National Titles from 1983-2002 winning 6*
.
I believe with the new Playoff setup you could technically be back if you finish in the top 12 but I expect it would be somewhat rare for a 12th ranked team to win the playoff and win it all. Back to me would mean finishing in the top 6 of the 12-team playoff and at least Split the rivalry games if not win both this year.
I realize some people define back as winning it all but realistically we have only been back like 6 times lol. I think being in the hunt is really what we aim for and understand some years we will win it all and some years we won't, basically like our status from 1983-2002.
The media plays up Miami being "back" every year there's reason for a modicum of hype.
The "back" talk is never internal. By Mario's standard... Jimmy Johnson... any old schooler who did it back in the day—"back" is defined by winning a national championship and being in the hunt every year.
By realistic terms, "back" for Miami should mean being a true competitor again—in the ACC hunt every year, double-digit wins, reaching the playoffs, putting more kids into the NFL (and definitely more first-day kids).
Consistency is the key to "back"—not this annual 7-6 nonsense with an occasional 10-3 or 9-4 year. 10-3 needs to be the floor to "back" not the ceiling.
The media will hype "back" this year because of Cam Ward, year three for Cristobal and some recruiting classes and portal moves—but the real fan knows this team's two-deep isn't where it needs to be and that the Canes are an injury or two away from disaster (depending on said player.)
It's good business for ESPN and others to play the "Miami is back" card as they know there is so much anti-Canes vitriol across the nation; so it will fire up the haters to mouth off, repost these stories, to make fun of 'The U' and to get all these sports sites the clicks, shares and engagement they demand.
Miami is polarizing and while the fan base alumni-wise doesn't compare to powerhouse programs, fact remains 'The U' is a national brand that is loved by some and hated by most. The sports world isn't really indifferent on the Canes; it's a love-hate relationship.... whereas nationwide alum may love their Wolverines, Buckeyes or Longhorns.... those with no ties to those programs couldn't care less about them.
People have an opinion on the Miami Hurricanes one way or another, so prepare for another pre-season of "Are the Canes BACK?" type questions from the media, lashing out from rivals and then all the "pretender" and "they aren't back" comments the minute UM loses a game.
Saw it two years ago when ESPN dropped their
"Miami football has been waiting two decades for a quarterback like Tyler Van Dyke" hype piece, only to see the kid wilt under the pressure—2-3 after five games, including an embarrassing home loss to Middle Tennessee State.
Tyler Van Dyke fits the mold at the "original QBU" -- the Miami Hurricanes quarterback is brash and talented, and he might well win a Heisman next year, whether he wants to or not.
www.espn.com